在接受有创冠状动脉评估的可燃香烟吸烟者中,比较电子烟和加热不燃烧香烟对急性冠状动脉、全身和环境影响的一项随机试验:su - vapes 3试验的基本原理和设计。

Q3 Medicine Minerva cardioangiologica Pub Date : 2020-12-01 Epub Date: 2020-06-02 DOI:10.23736/S0026-4725.20.05181-6
Giuseppe Biondi Zoccai, Roberto Carnevale, Matteo Vitali, Luigi Tritapepe, Ombretta Martinelli, Francesco Macrina, Chris Bullen, Mariangela Peruzzi, Elena Cavarretta, Antonino G Marullo, Antonio Abbate, Enrico Romagnoli, Sebastiano Sciarretta, Rebecca Casati, Giuseppe Visconti, Francesco Versaci, Giacomo Frati
{"title":"在接受有创冠状动脉评估的可燃香烟吸烟者中,比较电子烟和加热不燃烧香烟对急性冠状动脉、全身和环境影响的一项随机试验:su - vapes 3试验的基本原理和设计。","authors":"Giuseppe Biondi Zoccai,&nbsp;Roberto Carnevale,&nbsp;Matteo Vitali,&nbsp;Luigi Tritapepe,&nbsp;Ombretta Martinelli,&nbsp;Francesco Macrina,&nbsp;Chris Bullen,&nbsp;Mariangela Peruzzi,&nbsp;Elena Cavarretta,&nbsp;Antonino G Marullo,&nbsp;Antonio Abbate,&nbsp;Enrico Romagnoli,&nbsp;Sebastiano Sciarretta,&nbsp;Rebecca Casati,&nbsp;Giuseppe Visconti,&nbsp;Francesco Versaci,&nbsp;Giacomo Frati","doi":"10.23736/S0026-4725.20.05181-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Traditional combustible cigarette (TCC) smoking remains a major cause of preventable cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Modified risk products (MRP) such as electronic vaping cigarettes (EVC) and heat-not-burn cigarettes (HNBC) may be safer than TCC but may still have detrimental oxidative, platelet and vascular effects of particular importance to people with symptomatic coronary artery disease (CAD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We aimed to compare the acute coronary, systemic and environmental effects of two leading MRP in 20 TCC smokers admitted for invasive coronary assessment of CAD and willing to quit or after prior failed quitting attempts. After confirmation at angiography of an intermediate coronary stenosis, coronary flow reserve (CFR) will be appraised. Patients will then be randomized 1:1 to use a single EVC or a single HNBC in the catheterization laboratory, followed by repeat CFR measurement. The primary endpoint will be the change in CFR before and after product use. Quantitative coronary angiography, fractional flow reserve (FFR), and instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) will also be measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We expected to accrue results able to: 1) test whether MRP have in general a detrimental impact on coronary vascular function in TCC smokers; 2) test whether EVC have a different impact than HNBC on coronary function; 3) provide ancillary pathophysiologic and translational insights on the acute risk and safety profile of MRP in TCC smokers with established cardiovascular disease, including complex correlations between coronary, cardiac, systemic and environmental effects. In addition, by directly informing participants of their individual results, they will be further empowered to quit TCC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Sapienza University of Rome-Vascular Assessment of Proatherosclerotic Effects of Smoking (SUR-VAPES) 3 trial will provide important insights into the pathophysiologic cardiovascular impact of EVC and HNBC, also suitable to inform patients and individualize their smoking cessation strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":18565,"journal":{"name":"Minerva cardioangiologica","volume":" ","pages":"548-555"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A randomized trial comparing the acute coronary, systemic, and environmental effects of electronic vaping cigarettes versus heat-not-burn cigarettes in smokers of combustible cigarettes undergoing invasive coronary assessment: rationale and design of the SUR-VAPES 3 trial.\",\"authors\":\"Giuseppe Biondi Zoccai,&nbsp;Roberto Carnevale,&nbsp;Matteo Vitali,&nbsp;Luigi Tritapepe,&nbsp;Ombretta Martinelli,&nbsp;Francesco Macrina,&nbsp;Chris Bullen,&nbsp;Mariangela Peruzzi,&nbsp;Elena Cavarretta,&nbsp;Antonino G Marullo,&nbsp;Antonio Abbate,&nbsp;Enrico Romagnoli,&nbsp;Sebastiano Sciarretta,&nbsp;Rebecca Casati,&nbsp;Giuseppe Visconti,&nbsp;Francesco Versaci,&nbsp;Giacomo Frati\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S0026-4725.20.05181-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Traditional combustible cigarette (TCC) smoking remains a major cause of preventable cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Modified risk products (MRP) such as electronic vaping cigarettes (EVC) and heat-not-burn cigarettes (HNBC) may be safer than TCC but may still have detrimental oxidative, platelet and vascular effects of particular importance to people with symptomatic coronary artery disease (CAD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We aimed to compare the acute coronary, systemic and environmental effects of two leading MRP in 20 TCC smokers admitted for invasive coronary assessment of CAD and willing to quit or after prior failed quitting attempts. After confirmation at angiography of an intermediate coronary stenosis, coronary flow reserve (CFR) will be appraised. Patients will then be randomized 1:1 to use a single EVC or a single HNBC in the catheterization laboratory, followed by repeat CFR measurement. The primary endpoint will be the change in CFR before and after product use. Quantitative coronary angiography, fractional flow reserve (FFR), and instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) will also be measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We expected to accrue results able to: 1) test whether MRP have in general a detrimental impact on coronary vascular function in TCC smokers; 2) test whether EVC have a different impact than HNBC on coronary function; 3) provide ancillary pathophysiologic and translational insights on the acute risk and safety profile of MRP in TCC smokers with established cardiovascular disease, including complex correlations between coronary, cardiac, systemic and environmental effects. In addition, by directly informing participants of their individual results, they will be further empowered to quit TCC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Sapienza University of Rome-Vascular Assessment of Proatherosclerotic Effects of Smoking (SUR-VAPES) 3 trial will provide important insights into the pathophysiologic cardiovascular impact of EVC and HNBC, also suitable to inform patients and individualize their smoking cessation strategy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18565,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minerva cardioangiologica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"548-555\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minerva cardioangiologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4725.20.05181-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/6/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva cardioangiologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4725.20.05181-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/6/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

背景:传统的可燃香烟(TCC)吸烟仍然是可预防的心血管疾病和死亡的主要原因。改良风险产品(MRP),如电子烟(EVC)和加热不燃烧香烟(HNBC)可能比TCC更安全,但仍可能对氧化、血小板和血管产生有害影响,对有症状的冠状动脉疾病(CAD)患者尤其重要。方法:我们的目的是比较两种主要MRP对20名接受CAD侵入性冠状动脉评估并愿意戒烟或先前戒烟失败的TCC吸烟者的急性冠状动脉、全身和环境影响。造影确认中度冠状动脉狭窄后,评估冠状动脉血流储备(CFR)。然后将患者按1:1的比例随机分配,在导管实验室中使用单个EVC或单个HNBC,随后进行重复CFR测量。主要终点将是产品使用前后CFR的变化。定量冠状动脉造影、血流储备分数(FFR)和瞬时无波比(iFR)也将被测量。结果:我们期望获得的结果能够:1)测试MRP是否对TCC吸烟者的冠状动脉血管功能有一般的有害影响;2)检验EVC与HNBC对冠状动脉功能的影响是否不同;3)提供辅助的病理生理学和转化见解,了解MRP在患有心血管疾病的TCC吸烟者中的急性风险和安全性,包括冠状动脉、心脏、全身和环境影响之间的复杂相关性。此外,通过直接通知参与者他们的个人结果,他们将进一步有权退出TCC。结论:罗马Sapienza大学的血管评估吸烟对动脉粥样硬化的影响(su - vapes) 3试验将为EVC和HNBC的心血管病理生理影响提供重要见解,也适用于告知患者和个性化戒烟策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A randomized trial comparing the acute coronary, systemic, and environmental effects of electronic vaping cigarettes versus heat-not-burn cigarettes in smokers of combustible cigarettes undergoing invasive coronary assessment: rationale and design of the SUR-VAPES 3 trial.

Background: Traditional combustible cigarette (TCC) smoking remains a major cause of preventable cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Modified risk products (MRP) such as electronic vaping cigarettes (EVC) and heat-not-burn cigarettes (HNBC) may be safer than TCC but may still have detrimental oxidative, platelet and vascular effects of particular importance to people with symptomatic coronary artery disease (CAD).

Methods: We aimed to compare the acute coronary, systemic and environmental effects of two leading MRP in 20 TCC smokers admitted for invasive coronary assessment of CAD and willing to quit or after prior failed quitting attempts. After confirmation at angiography of an intermediate coronary stenosis, coronary flow reserve (CFR) will be appraised. Patients will then be randomized 1:1 to use a single EVC or a single HNBC in the catheterization laboratory, followed by repeat CFR measurement. The primary endpoint will be the change in CFR before and after product use. Quantitative coronary angiography, fractional flow reserve (FFR), and instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) will also be measured.

Results: We expected to accrue results able to: 1) test whether MRP have in general a detrimental impact on coronary vascular function in TCC smokers; 2) test whether EVC have a different impact than HNBC on coronary function; 3) provide ancillary pathophysiologic and translational insights on the acute risk and safety profile of MRP in TCC smokers with established cardiovascular disease, including complex correlations between coronary, cardiac, systemic and environmental effects. In addition, by directly informing participants of their individual results, they will be further empowered to quit TCC.

Conclusions: The Sapienza University of Rome-Vascular Assessment of Proatherosclerotic Effects of Smoking (SUR-VAPES) 3 trial will provide important insights into the pathophysiologic cardiovascular impact of EVC and HNBC, also suitable to inform patients and individualize their smoking cessation strategy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva cardioangiologica
Minerva cardioangiologica CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: A Journal on Heart and Vascular Diseases.
期刊最新文献
Systolic, mean and pulse pressure values in patients with acute coronary syndrome: worth keeping an eye on. Instantaneous wave-free ratio-guided revascularization of non-culprit lesion in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel coronary disease: design and rationale of the WAVE registry. Cannabis, health and prevention. The role of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in acute coronary syndrome patients: a critical risk factor for lipid plaque burden? Left ventricular global longitudinal strain assessment in patients with Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy: a call for an echocardiography-based classification.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1