Yoshihiro Katsuura, Katherine Yao, Eric Chang, Tareck A Kadrie, John A Dorizas
{"title":"肩双压伤综合征:肩胛上神经病变合并颈神经根病患者的回顾性研究。","authors":"Yoshihiro Katsuura, Katherine Yao, Eric Chang, Tareck A Kadrie, John A Dorizas","doi":"10.1177/1179544120921854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>While the double crush phenomena (compression along two points on a nerve) has been established between median neuropathy and cervical radiculopathy, combined suprascapular neuropathy (SSN) and cervical C5/C6 radiculopathy-so-called shoulder double crush syndrome-has not been well examined. We aim to identify the incidence of shoulder double crush syndrome in patients undergoing arthroscopic suprascapular nerve release for SSN.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred consecutive patients >18 years of age who were positive for SSN on electromyography and motor nerve conduction studies (EMG/NCS) and underwent a suprascapular nerve release were included. Patients with evidence of shoulder double crush syndrome were identified based on x ray, cervical spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and examination findings. Demographics, electrodiagnostics results, treatment courses, and clinical outcomes (visual analog scores and rotator cuff strength) following arthroscopic suprascapular nerve release were compared between patients with double crush syndrome versus isolated SSN.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty one percent of patients had evidence of shoulder crush syndrome. Two significant electrophysiologic differences were noted in shoulder double crush patients compared to isolated SSN patients. Patients with double crush had an increased incidence of median neuropathy (51% vs 30%, <i>P</i> = .04). Double crush patients had less supraspinatus motor amplitude difference between the affected side and non-affected side compared to isolated SSN patients (2.62 mV vs 3.44 mV, <i>P</i> = .03). In general, most double crush patients were treated conservatively with regard to their cervical spine pathology.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A significant percentage of patients with SSN have evidence of shoulder double crush syndrome. Patients with SSN and concomitant median neuropathy should have a detailed neck examination performed.</p>","PeriodicalId":10443,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Medicine Insights. Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":"13 ","pages":"1179544120921854"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1179544120921854","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shoulder Double Crush Syndrome: A Retrospective Study of Patients With Concomitant Suprascapular Neuropathy and Cervical Radiculopathy.\",\"authors\":\"Yoshihiro Katsuura, Katherine Yao, Eric Chang, Tareck A Kadrie, John A Dorizas\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1179544120921854\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>While the double crush phenomena (compression along two points on a nerve) has been established between median neuropathy and cervical radiculopathy, combined suprascapular neuropathy (SSN) and cervical C5/C6 radiculopathy-so-called shoulder double crush syndrome-has not been well examined. We aim to identify the incidence of shoulder double crush syndrome in patients undergoing arthroscopic suprascapular nerve release for SSN.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred consecutive patients >18 years of age who were positive for SSN on electromyography and motor nerve conduction studies (EMG/NCS) and underwent a suprascapular nerve release were included. Patients with evidence of shoulder double crush syndrome were identified based on x ray, cervical spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and examination findings. Demographics, electrodiagnostics results, treatment courses, and clinical outcomes (visual analog scores and rotator cuff strength) following arthroscopic suprascapular nerve release were compared between patients with double crush syndrome versus isolated SSN.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty one percent of patients had evidence of shoulder crush syndrome. Two significant electrophysiologic differences were noted in shoulder double crush patients compared to isolated SSN patients. Patients with double crush had an increased incidence of median neuropathy (51% vs 30%, <i>P</i> = .04). Double crush patients had less supraspinatus motor amplitude difference between the affected side and non-affected side compared to isolated SSN patients (2.62 mV vs 3.44 mV, <i>P</i> = .03). In general, most double crush patients were treated conservatively with regard to their cervical spine pathology.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A significant percentage of patients with SSN have evidence of shoulder double crush syndrome. Patients with SSN and concomitant median neuropathy should have a detailed neck examination performed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10443,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Medicine Insights. Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Disorders\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"1179544120921854\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1179544120921854\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Medicine Insights. Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1179544120921854\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Medicine Insights. Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1179544120921854","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
目的:虽然在正中神经病变和颈神经根病之间存在双重挤压现象(沿神经两点受压),但肩胛上神经病变(SSN)和颈C5/C6神经根病合并-即所谓的肩部双重挤压综合征-尚未得到很好的研究。我们的目的是确定肩胛上神经松解术患者肩关节双重挤压综合征的发生率。方法:连续100例年龄>18岁,肌电图和运动神经传导(EMG/NCS)阳性,并行肩胛上神经释放术的患者。根据x线,颈椎磁共振成像(MRI)和检查结果确定有肩部双挤压综合征证据的患者。比较了双重挤压综合征患者与孤立性SSN患者在关节镜下肩胛上神经释放后的人口统计学、电诊断结果、疗程和临床结果(视觉模拟评分和肩袖强度)。结果:31%的患者有肩压综合征的证据。与孤立的SSN患者相比,双肩关节挤压患者有两个显著的电生理差异。双挤压患者中位神经病变发生率增加(51% vs 30%, P = 0.04)。与孤立的SSN患者相比,双挤压患者患侧和非患侧冈上肌运动振幅差异较小(2.62 mV vs 3.44 mV, P = 0.03)。一般来说,大多数双重挤压患者在颈椎病理方面采用保守治疗。结论:相当比例的SSN患者有肩部双挤压综合征的证据。伴有SSN并伴有正中神经病变的患者应进行详细的颈部检查。
Shoulder Double Crush Syndrome: A Retrospective Study of Patients With Concomitant Suprascapular Neuropathy and Cervical Radiculopathy.
Purpose: While the double crush phenomena (compression along two points on a nerve) has been established between median neuropathy and cervical radiculopathy, combined suprascapular neuropathy (SSN) and cervical C5/C6 radiculopathy-so-called shoulder double crush syndrome-has not been well examined. We aim to identify the incidence of shoulder double crush syndrome in patients undergoing arthroscopic suprascapular nerve release for SSN.
Methods: One hundred consecutive patients >18 years of age who were positive for SSN on electromyography and motor nerve conduction studies (EMG/NCS) and underwent a suprascapular nerve release were included. Patients with evidence of shoulder double crush syndrome were identified based on x ray, cervical spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and examination findings. Demographics, electrodiagnostics results, treatment courses, and clinical outcomes (visual analog scores and rotator cuff strength) following arthroscopic suprascapular nerve release were compared between patients with double crush syndrome versus isolated SSN.
Results: Thirty one percent of patients had evidence of shoulder crush syndrome. Two significant electrophysiologic differences were noted in shoulder double crush patients compared to isolated SSN patients. Patients with double crush had an increased incidence of median neuropathy (51% vs 30%, P = .04). Double crush patients had less supraspinatus motor amplitude difference between the affected side and non-affected side compared to isolated SSN patients (2.62 mV vs 3.44 mV, P = .03). In general, most double crush patients were treated conservatively with regard to their cervical spine pathology.
Conclusion: A significant percentage of patients with SSN have evidence of shoulder double crush syndrome. Patients with SSN and concomitant median neuropathy should have a detailed neck examination performed.