血液作为流体的模拟:从流变学角度综述

IF 17.2 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering Pub Date : 2020-07-22 DOI:10.1109/RBME.2020.3011182
Vikas Kannojiya;Arup Kumar Das;Prasanta Kumar Das
{"title":"血液作为流体的模拟:从流变学角度综述","authors":"Vikas Kannojiya;Arup Kumar Das;Prasanta Kumar Das","doi":"10.1109/RBME.2020.3011182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Blood flow in the human vascular system is a complex to understand example of fluid dynamics in a closed conduit. Any irregularities in the hemodynamics may lead to lethal cardiovascular disease like heart attack, heart failure and ischemia. Numerical simulation of hemodynamics in the blood vessel can facilitate a thorough understanding of blood flow and its interaction with the adjacent vessel wall. A good simulation approach for blood flow can be helpful in early prediction and diagnosis of the mentioned disease. The simulation outcomes may also provide decision support for surgical planning and medical implants. This study reports an extensive review of various approaches adopted to analyze the influence of blood rheological characteristics in a different class of blood vessels. In particular, emphasis was given on the identification of best possible rheological model to effectively solve the hemodynamics inside different blood vessels. The performance capability of different rheological models was discussed for different classes and conditions of vessels and the best/poor performing models are listed out. The Carreau, Casson and generalized power-law models were appeared to be superior for solving the blood flow at all shear rates. In contrast, power law, Walburn-Scheck and Herchel-Bulkley model lacks behind in the purpose.","PeriodicalId":39235,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering","volume":"14 ","pages":"327-341"},"PeriodicalIF":17.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1109/RBME.2020.3011182","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simulation of Blood as Fluid: A Review From Rheological Aspects\",\"authors\":\"Vikas Kannojiya;Arup Kumar Das;Prasanta Kumar Das\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/RBME.2020.3011182\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Blood flow in the human vascular system is a complex to understand example of fluid dynamics in a closed conduit. Any irregularities in the hemodynamics may lead to lethal cardiovascular disease like heart attack, heart failure and ischemia. Numerical simulation of hemodynamics in the blood vessel can facilitate a thorough understanding of blood flow and its interaction with the adjacent vessel wall. A good simulation approach for blood flow can be helpful in early prediction and diagnosis of the mentioned disease. The simulation outcomes may also provide decision support for surgical planning and medical implants. This study reports an extensive review of various approaches adopted to analyze the influence of blood rheological characteristics in a different class of blood vessels. In particular, emphasis was given on the identification of best possible rheological model to effectively solve the hemodynamics inside different blood vessels. The performance capability of different rheological models was discussed for different classes and conditions of vessels and the best/poor performing models are listed out. The Carreau, Casson and generalized power-law models were appeared to be superior for solving the blood flow at all shear rates. In contrast, power law, Walburn-Scheck and Herchel-Bulkley model lacks behind in the purpose.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39235,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"327-341\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":17.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1109/RBME.2020.3011182\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9146357/\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9146357/","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

人体血管系统中的血流是一个复杂的例子,难以理解封闭导管中的流体动力学。血流动力学的任何异常都可能导致致命的心血管疾病,如心脏病发作、心力衰竭和局部缺血。对血管内血流动力学的数值模拟有助于深入了解血流及其与邻近血管壁的相互作用。一种良好的血流模拟方法有助于上述疾病的早期预测和诊断。模拟结果还可以为手术计划和医疗植入物提供决策支持。本研究报告了对分析不同类别血管中血液流变特性影响的各种方法的广泛综述。特别是,重点是确定尽可能好的流变模型,以有效地解决不同血管内的血液动力学问题。讨论了不同流变模型在不同类别和条件下的性能,并列出了性能最佳/较差的模型。Carreau、Casson和广义幂律模型在求解所有剪切速率下的血流时似乎更为优越。相比之下,幂律、沃尔伯恩-舍克和赫歇尔-布尔克利模型在目的上有所欠缺。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Simulation of Blood as Fluid: A Review From Rheological Aspects
Blood flow in the human vascular system is a complex to understand example of fluid dynamics in a closed conduit. Any irregularities in the hemodynamics may lead to lethal cardiovascular disease like heart attack, heart failure and ischemia. Numerical simulation of hemodynamics in the blood vessel can facilitate a thorough understanding of blood flow and its interaction with the adjacent vessel wall. A good simulation approach for blood flow can be helpful in early prediction and diagnosis of the mentioned disease. The simulation outcomes may also provide decision support for surgical planning and medical implants. This study reports an extensive review of various approaches adopted to analyze the influence of blood rheological characteristics in a different class of blood vessels. In particular, emphasis was given on the identification of best possible rheological model to effectively solve the hemodynamics inside different blood vessels. The performance capability of different rheological models was discussed for different classes and conditions of vessels and the best/poor performing models are listed out. The Carreau, Casson and generalized power-law models were appeared to be superior for solving the blood flow at all shear rates. In contrast, power law, Walburn-Scheck and Herchel-Bulkley model lacks behind in the purpose.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering
IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering Engineering-Biomedical Engineering
CiteScore
31.70
自引率
0.60%
发文量
93
期刊介绍: IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering (RBME) serves as a platform to review the state-of-the-art and trends in the interdisciplinary field of biomedical engineering, which encompasses engineering, life sciences, and medicine. The journal aims to consolidate research and reviews for members of all IEEE societies interested in biomedical engineering. Recognizing the demand for comprehensive reviews among authors of various IEEE journals, RBME addresses this need by receiving, reviewing, and publishing scholarly works under one umbrella. It covers a broad spectrum, from historical to modern developments in biomedical engineering and the integration of technologies from various IEEE societies into the life sciences and medicine.
期刊最新文献
Foundation Model for Advancing Healthcare: Challenges, Opportunities and Future Directions. A Manual for Genome and Transcriptome Engineering. Artificial General Intelligence for Medical Imaging Analysis. A Survey of Few-Shot Learning for Biomedical Time Series. The Physiome Project and Digital Twins.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1