{"title":"不同麻醉镇痛方式对食管癌术后患者细胞免疫及认知功能的影响。","authors":"Rongyu Zhu, Jun Xiang, Ming Tan","doi":"10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08283-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The study intends to analyze influences of different anesthesia and analgesia on cellular immune and cognitive functions of patients undergoing thoracotomy for esophageal cancer (EsC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing thoracotomy for EsC were divided into four groups: Group A (received general anesthesia [GA]) and postoperative intravenous analgesia); B (received GA and postoperative epidural analgesia); C (received GA combined with thoracic epidural anesthesia [TEA]) and postoperative intravenous analgesia); D (received GA combined with TEA and postoperative epidural analgesia). The T-lymphocyte subsets were determined at 30 min before anesthesia induction (T<inf>0</inf>), 2 h after skin incision (T<inf>1</inf>), and at 4 h (T<inf>2</inf>), 24 h (T<inf>3</inf>), and 48 h (T<inf>4</inf>) after operation. Besides, visual analogue scale (VAS) and mini-mental state examination (MMSE) were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The percentage of CD3<sup>+</sup> and CD4<sup>+</sup> cells in groups B and C were higher than group A from T<inf>1</inf> to T<inf>3</inf>. The ratio of CD4<sup>+</sup>/CD8<sup>+</sup> in group B and C were higher than in group A at T<inf>3</inf>. Compared with group A, group D had increased percentages of CD3<sup>+</sup> and CD4<sup>+</sup> from T<inf>1</inf> to T<inf>4</inf>, and elevated ratio of CD4<sup>+</sup>/CD8<sup>+</sup> from T<inf>2</inf> to T<inf>4</inf> VAS scores were lower and MMSE scores were higher in groups B, C, and D than in group A, and group D had relatively lower VAS and higher MMSE scores as compared to group B.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The intraoperative general anesthesia combined with thoracic epidural anesthesia and postoperative epidural analgesia may reduce adverse effect on cellular immune and cognitive functions of patients undergoing thoracotomy for EsC.</p>","PeriodicalId":18714,"journal":{"name":"Minerva chirurgica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of different anesthesia and analgesia on cellular immunity and cognitive function of patients after surgery for esophageal cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Rongyu Zhu, Jun Xiang, Ming Tan\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08283-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The study intends to analyze influences of different anesthesia and analgesia on cellular immune and cognitive functions of patients undergoing thoracotomy for esophageal cancer (EsC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing thoracotomy for EsC were divided into four groups: Group A (received general anesthesia [GA]) and postoperative intravenous analgesia); B (received GA and postoperative epidural analgesia); C (received GA combined with thoracic epidural anesthesia [TEA]) and postoperative intravenous analgesia); D (received GA combined with TEA and postoperative epidural analgesia). The T-lymphocyte subsets were determined at 30 min before anesthesia induction (T<inf>0</inf>), 2 h after skin incision (T<inf>1</inf>), and at 4 h (T<inf>2</inf>), 24 h (T<inf>3</inf>), and 48 h (T<inf>4</inf>) after operation. Besides, visual analogue scale (VAS) and mini-mental state examination (MMSE) were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The percentage of CD3<sup>+</sup> and CD4<sup>+</sup> cells in groups B and C were higher than group A from T<inf>1</inf> to T<inf>3</inf>. The ratio of CD4<sup>+</sup>/CD8<sup>+</sup> in group B and C were higher than in group A at T<inf>3</inf>. Compared with group A, group D had increased percentages of CD3<sup>+</sup> and CD4<sup>+</sup> from T<inf>1</inf> to T<inf>4</inf>, and elevated ratio of CD4<sup>+</sup>/CD8<sup>+</sup> from T<inf>2</inf> to T<inf>4</inf> VAS scores were lower and MMSE scores were higher in groups B, C, and D than in group A, and group D had relatively lower VAS and higher MMSE scores as compared to group B.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The intraoperative general anesthesia combined with thoracic epidural anesthesia and postoperative epidural analgesia may reduce adverse effect on cellular immune and cognitive functions of patients undergoing thoracotomy for EsC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18714,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minerva chirurgica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minerva chirurgica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08283-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/8/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva chirurgica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08283-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/8/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
摘要
背景:本研究旨在分析不同麻醉镇痛方式对食管癌开胸手术患者细胞免疫和认知功能的影响。方法:将行开胸手术治疗EsC的患者分为四组:A组(全麻[GA])及术后静脉镇痛;B(接受GA和术后硬膜外镇痛);C (GA联合胸段硬膜外麻醉[TEA])和术后静脉镇痛);D (GA联合TEA及术后硬膜外镇痛)。分别于麻醉诱导前30 min (T0)、皮肤切开后2 h (T1)、术后4 h (T2)、24 h (T3)、48 h (T4)测定t淋巴细胞亚群。同时进行视觉模拟量表(VAS)和简易精神状态检查(MMSE)。结果:从T1到T3, B、C组的CD3+和CD4+细胞百分比均高于A组。T3时,B、C组CD4+/CD8+比值均高于A组。与A组比较,D组T1 ~ T4 CD3+、CD4+百分比升高,T2 ~ T4 CD4+/CD8+比值升高,B、C、D组VAS评分低于A组,MMSE评分高于B组,D组VAS评分低于B组,MMSE评分高于B组。术中全麻联合胸段硬膜外麻醉和术后硬膜外镇痛可减轻对开胸手术患者细胞免疫和认知功能的不良影响。
Effects of different anesthesia and analgesia on cellular immunity and cognitive function of patients after surgery for esophageal cancer.
Background: The study intends to analyze influences of different anesthesia and analgesia on cellular immune and cognitive functions of patients undergoing thoracotomy for esophageal cancer (EsC).
Methods: Patients undergoing thoracotomy for EsC were divided into four groups: Group A (received general anesthesia [GA]) and postoperative intravenous analgesia); B (received GA and postoperative epidural analgesia); C (received GA combined with thoracic epidural anesthesia [TEA]) and postoperative intravenous analgesia); D (received GA combined with TEA and postoperative epidural analgesia). The T-lymphocyte subsets were determined at 30 min before anesthesia induction (T0), 2 h after skin incision (T1), and at 4 h (T2), 24 h (T3), and 48 h (T4) after operation. Besides, visual analogue scale (VAS) and mini-mental state examination (MMSE) were assessed.
Results: The percentage of CD3+ and CD4+ cells in groups B and C were higher than group A from T1 to T3. The ratio of CD4+/CD8+ in group B and C were higher than in group A at T3. Compared with group A, group D had increased percentages of CD3+ and CD4+ from T1 to T4, and elevated ratio of CD4+/CD8+ from T2 to T4 VAS scores were lower and MMSE scores were higher in groups B, C, and D than in group A, and group D had relatively lower VAS and higher MMSE scores as compared to group B.
Conclusions: The intraoperative general anesthesia combined with thoracic epidural anesthesia and postoperative epidural analgesia may reduce adverse effect on cellular immune and cognitive functions of patients undergoing thoracotomy for EsC.
期刊介绍:
Minerva Chirurgica publishes scientific papers on surgery. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, case reports, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines. The journal aims to provide its readers with papers of the highest quality and impact through a process of careful peer review and editorial work.