Jean Desroches , Maxim Roy , Marc Belliveau , Benoit Leblanc , Pierre Beaulieu
{"title":"PECS I阻断增强乳房成形术患者术后镇痛:随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究","authors":"Jean Desroches , Maxim Roy , Marc Belliveau , Benoit Leblanc , Pierre Beaulieu","doi":"10.1016/j.bjan.2020.04.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objectives</h3><p>PECS I block was first described for surgery involving the pectoralis muscles. No randomized clinical trial has been conducted on surgeries that directly involve these muscles, such as subpectoral breast augmentation. We hypothesized that PECS I block would decrease pain in the postoperative period in this population.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This was a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial in women undergoing subpectoral breast augmentation surgery. PECS I block was performed using 0.4 mL.kg<sup>‐1</sup> of 0.9% saline on one side and bupivacaine (0.25%) on the other side, each patient being her own control. Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain scores (0<!--> <!-->−<!--> <!-->10) were measured at rest and during movement. The primary outcome was pain score at rest 30 minutes after arrival in the PACU. To detect a clinically significant difference of 50% in pain reduction, 14 volunteers were enrolled (power of 90% and alpha<!--> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In the PACU, three patients had no difference in pain between sides, five had reduced pain on the placebo side, and six had reduced pain on the bupivacaine side. In the bupivacaine group, pain scores at rest at 5, 30 and 60 minutes and 24 hours were 4.89 (4.23<!--> <!-->−<!--> <!-->5.56; mean 95% CI), 3.75 (3.13<!--> <!-->−<!--> <!-->4.37), 3.79 (2.93<!--> <!-->−<!--> <!-->4.64), and 2.29 (1.56<!--> <!-->−<!--> <!-->3.01), respectively, whereas in the placebo group, they were 4.96 (4.32<!--> <!-->−<!--> <!-->5.60), 4.00 (3.50<!--> <!-->−<!--> <!-->4.49), 3.93 (3.12<!--> <!-->−<!--> <!-->4.73), and 2.29 (1.56<!--> <!-->−<!--> <!-->3.01), respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>PECS I block in patients undergoing breast augmentation surgery does not provide better pain relief than placebo. Therefore, the indications for PECS I block in breast augmentation surgery should be reconsidered.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21261,"journal":{"name":"Revista brasileira de anestesiologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bjan.2020.04.013","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bloqueio PECS I para analgesia pós‐operatória em pacientes submetidos a mamoplastia de aumento: estudo randomizado, duplo‐cego, controlado por placebo\",\"authors\":\"Jean Desroches , Maxim Roy , Marc Belliveau , Benoit Leblanc , Pierre Beaulieu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bjan.2020.04.013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and objectives</h3><p>PECS I block was first described for surgery involving the pectoralis muscles. No randomized clinical trial has been conducted on surgeries that directly involve these muscles, such as subpectoral breast augmentation. We hypothesized that PECS I block would decrease pain in the postoperative period in this population.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This was a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial in women undergoing subpectoral breast augmentation surgery. PECS I block was performed using 0.4 mL.kg<sup>‐1</sup> of 0.9% saline on one side and bupivacaine (0.25%) on the other side, each patient being her own control. Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain scores (0<!--> <!-->−<!--> <!-->10) were measured at rest and during movement. The primary outcome was pain score at rest 30 minutes after arrival in the PACU. To detect a clinically significant difference of 50% in pain reduction, 14 volunteers were enrolled (power of 90% and alpha<!--> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In the PACU, three patients had no difference in pain between sides, five had reduced pain on the placebo side, and six had reduced pain on the bupivacaine side. In the bupivacaine group, pain scores at rest at 5, 30 and 60 minutes and 24 hours were 4.89 (4.23<!--> <!-->−<!--> <!-->5.56; mean 95% CI), 3.75 (3.13<!--> <!-->−<!--> <!-->4.37), 3.79 (2.93<!--> <!-->−<!--> <!-->4.64), and 2.29 (1.56<!--> <!-->−<!--> <!-->3.01), respectively, whereas in the placebo group, they were 4.96 (4.32<!--> <!-->−<!--> <!-->5.60), 4.00 (3.50<!--> <!-->−<!--> <!-->4.49), 3.93 (3.12<!--> <!-->−<!--> <!-->4.73), and 2.29 (1.56<!--> <!-->−<!--> <!-->3.01), respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>PECS I block in patients undergoing breast augmentation surgery does not provide better pain relief than placebo. Therefore, the indications for PECS I block in breast augmentation surgery should be reconsidered.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21261,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista brasileira de anestesiologia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bjan.2020.04.013\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista brasileira de anestesiologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034709420303718\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista brasileira de anestesiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034709420303718","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Bloqueio PECS I para analgesia pós‐operatória em pacientes submetidos a mamoplastia de aumento: estudo randomizado, duplo‐cego, controlado por placebo
Background and objectives
PECS I block was first described for surgery involving the pectoralis muscles. No randomized clinical trial has been conducted on surgeries that directly involve these muscles, such as subpectoral breast augmentation. We hypothesized that PECS I block would decrease pain in the postoperative period in this population.
Methods
This was a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial in women undergoing subpectoral breast augmentation surgery. PECS I block was performed using 0.4 mL.kg‐1 of 0.9% saline on one side and bupivacaine (0.25%) on the other side, each patient being her own control. Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain scores (0 − 10) were measured at rest and during movement. The primary outcome was pain score at rest 30 minutes after arrival in the PACU. To detect a clinically significant difference of 50% in pain reduction, 14 volunteers were enrolled (power of 90% and alpha < 0.05).
Results
In the PACU, three patients had no difference in pain between sides, five had reduced pain on the placebo side, and six had reduced pain on the bupivacaine side. In the bupivacaine group, pain scores at rest at 5, 30 and 60 minutes and 24 hours were 4.89 (4.23 − 5.56; mean 95% CI), 3.75 (3.13 − 4.37), 3.79 (2.93 − 4.64), and 2.29 (1.56 − 3.01), respectively, whereas in the placebo group, they were 4.96 (4.32 − 5.60), 4.00 (3.50 − 4.49), 3.93 (3.12 − 4.73), and 2.29 (1.56 − 3.01), respectively.
Conclusions
PECS I block in patients undergoing breast augmentation surgery does not provide better pain relief than placebo. Therefore, the indications for PECS I block in breast augmentation surgery should be reconsidered.
期刊介绍:
The Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology is the official journal of the Brazilian Anesthesiology Society. It publishes articles classified into the following categories:
-Scientific articles (clinical or experimental trials)-
Clinical information (case reports)-
Reviews-
Letters to the Editor-
Editorials.
The journal focuses primarily on clinical trials, with scope on clinical practice, aiming at providing applied tools to the anesthesiologist and critical care physician.
The Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology accepts articles exclusively forwarded to it. Articles already published in other journals are not accepted. All articles proposed for publication are previously submitted to the analysis of two or more members of the Editorial Board or other specialized consultants.