关节内比较两个剂量氨甲环酸‐‐或全膝关节置换术后的出血:随机临床研究

Edmundo Pereira de Souza Neto , Gorka Usandizaga
{"title":"关节内比较两个剂量氨甲环酸‐‐或全膝关节置换术后的出血:随机临床研究","authors":"Edmundo Pereira de Souza Neto ,&nbsp;Gorka Usandizaga","doi":"10.1016/j.bjan.2020.03.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Tranexamic Acid (TXA), an antifibrinolytic that inhibits the fibrinolytic activity of plasmin is used to decrease perioperative blood loss and transfusion requirements in orthopedic surgery. The aim of our study was to compare postoperative bleeding in two intra‐articular doses (1<!--> <!-->g and 2<!--> <!-->g) of tranexamic acid in adult patients undergoing unilateral total knee replacement.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>We conducted a single‐operator, randomized, and controlled, double‐blind study in two groups. The G1 group received 1<!--> <!-->g of intra‐articular TXA and the G2 group 2<!--> <!-->g of intra‐articular TXA. Both groups received 15<!--> <!-->mg.kg<sup>‐1</sup> IV before the surgical incision (TXA induction dose) and then 10<!--> <!-->mg.kg<sup>‐1</sup>, orally, 6 and 12<!--> <!-->hours after the induction dose of TXA. The primary endpoint was bleeding measured by blood loss in postoperative drainage. Secondary outcomes were change in hemoglobin and hematocrit levels on the first and third postoperative days, and the need for transfusion during hospitalization.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In total, 100 patients were randomized, and 100 were included in the analysis. Blood loss in postoperative drainage was similar in both groups (200<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->50 vs. 250<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->50<!--> <!-->mL, G1 and G2 groups respectively). Change in hematocrit and hemoglobin values (% of change) between preoperative and day 3 were not statically significant between groups G1 and G2 (18<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->5 vs. 21<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->4; 21<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->7 vs. 22<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->5 respectively). No patients received blood transfusion.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our study did not show superiority of 2<!--> <!-->g of intra‐articular tranexamic acid compared to 1<!--> <!-->g.</p><p>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT04085575</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21261,"journal":{"name":"Revista brasileira de anestesiologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bjan.2020.03.015","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparação entre duas doses de ácido tranexâmico intra‐articular no sangramento pós‐operatório de artroplastia total do joelho: estudo clínico randomizado\",\"authors\":\"Edmundo Pereira de Souza Neto ,&nbsp;Gorka Usandizaga\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bjan.2020.03.015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Tranexamic Acid (TXA), an antifibrinolytic that inhibits the fibrinolytic activity of plasmin is used to decrease perioperative blood loss and transfusion requirements in orthopedic surgery. The aim of our study was to compare postoperative bleeding in two intra‐articular doses (1<!--> <!-->g and 2<!--> <!-->g) of tranexamic acid in adult patients undergoing unilateral total knee replacement.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>We conducted a single‐operator, randomized, and controlled, double‐blind study in two groups. The G1 group received 1<!--> <!-->g of intra‐articular TXA and the G2 group 2<!--> <!-->g of intra‐articular TXA. Both groups received 15<!--> <!-->mg.kg<sup>‐1</sup> IV before the surgical incision (TXA induction dose) and then 10<!--> <!-->mg.kg<sup>‐1</sup>, orally, 6 and 12<!--> <!-->hours after the induction dose of TXA. The primary endpoint was bleeding measured by blood loss in postoperative drainage. Secondary outcomes were change in hemoglobin and hematocrit levels on the first and third postoperative days, and the need for transfusion during hospitalization.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In total, 100 patients were randomized, and 100 were included in the analysis. Blood loss in postoperative drainage was similar in both groups (200<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->50 vs. 250<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->50<!--> <!-->mL, G1 and G2 groups respectively). Change in hematocrit and hemoglobin values (% of change) between preoperative and day 3 were not statically significant between groups G1 and G2 (18<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->5 vs. 21<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->4; 21<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->7 vs. 22<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->5 respectively). No patients received blood transfusion.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our study did not show superiority of 2<!--> <!-->g of intra‐articular tranexamic acid compared to 1<!--> <!-->g.</p><p>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT04085575</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21261,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista brasileira de anestesiologia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bjan.2020.03.015\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista brasileira de anestesiologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034709420303494\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista brasileira de anestesiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034709420303494","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

氨甲环酸(TXA)是一种抑制纤溶酶活性的抗纤溶剂,用于减少骨科手术围术期失血和输血需求。本研究的目的是比较单侧全膝关节置换术中成人患者两种关节内剂量(1g和2g)氨甲环酸的术后出血情况。方法采用单操作者、随机对照、双盲研究,分为两组。G1组给予1 g关节内TXA, G2组给予2 g关节内TXA。两组均服用15毫克。手术切口前静脉注射(TXA诱导剂量),然后10mg。kg‐1,口服,诱导剂量后6和12小时。主要终点是通过术后引流的出血量来测量出血。次要结局是术后第1天和第3天血红蛋白和红细胞压积水平的变化,以及住院期间输血的需要。结果共纳入100例患者,其中100例纳入分析。两组术后引流出血量相似(G1组和G2组分别为200±50 vs 250±50 mL)。G1组和G2组术前至第3天红细胞压积和血红蛋白值的变化(变化百分比)无统计学意义(18±5∶21±4;(21±7 vs. 22±5)。没有患者接受输血。结论我们的研究没有显示2 g关节内氨甲环酸比1 g有优势
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparação entre duas doses de ácido tranexâmico intra‐articular no sangramento pós‐operatório de artroplastia total do joelho: estudo clínico randomizado

Introduction

Tranexamic Acid (TXA), an antifibrinolytic that inhibits the fibrinolytic activity of plasmin is used to decrease perioperative blood loss and transfusion requirements in orthopedic surgery. The aim of our study was to compare postoperative bleeding in two intra‐articular doses (1 g and 2 g) of tranexamic acid in adult patients undergoing unilateral total knee replacement.

Method

We conducted a single‐operator, randomized, and controlled, double‐blind study in two groups. The G1 group received 1 g of intra‐articular TXA and the G2 group 2 g of intra‐articular TXA. Both groups received 15 mg.kg‐1 IV before the surgical incision (TXA induction dose) and then 10 mg.kg‐1, orally, 6 and 12 hours after the induction dose of TXA. The primary endpoint was bleeding measured by blood loss in postoperative drainage. Secondary outcomes were change in hemoglobin and hematocrit levels on the first and third postoperative days, and the need for transfusion during hospitalization.

Results

In total, 100 patients were randomized, and 100 were included in the analysis. Blood loss in postoperative drainage was similar in both groups (200 ± 50 vs. 250 ± 50 mL, G1 and G2 groups respectively). Change in hematocrit and hemoglobin values (% of change) between preoperative and day 3 were not statically significant between groups G1 and G2 (18 ± 5 vs. 21 ± 4; 21 ± 7 vs. 22 ± 5 respectively). No patients received blood transfusion.

Conclusions

Our study did not show superiority of 2 g of intra‐articular tranexamic acid compared to 1 g.

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT04085575

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: The Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology is the official journal of the Brazilian Anesthesiology Society. It publishes articles classified into the following categories: -Scientific articles (clinical or experimental trials)- Clinical information (case reports)- Reviews- Letters to the Editor- Editorials. The journal focuses primarily on clinical trials, with scope on clinical practice, aiming at providing applied tools to the anesthesiologist and critical care physician. The Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology accepts articles exclusively forwarded to it. Articles already published in other journals are not accepted. All articles proposed for publication are previously submitted to the analysis of two or more members of the Editorial Board or other specialized consultants.
期刊最新文献
Atualização sobre reações de hipersensibilidade perioperatória: documento conjunto da Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA) e Associação Brasileira de Alergia e Imunologia (ASBAI) – Parte II: etiologia e diagnóstico Propofol‐cetamina versus dexmedetomidina‐cetamina para sedação durante endoscopia digestiva alta em pacientes pediátricos: estudo clínico randomizado Comparação entre morfina subaracnoidea e bloqueio do nervo femoral para analgesia após reconstrução ligamentar de joelho: estudo clínico randomizado Sequência de segurança de intubação: o algoritmo 10 “Ps” e ferramenta cognitiva para manuseio de vias aéreas em pacientes com COVID‐19 Dexametasona perineural em bloqueio de plexo braquial interescalênico com levobupivacaína guiado por ultrassonografia para artroscopia de ombro em regime ambulatorial: ensaio clínico controlado e randomizado
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1