恐慌性抢购:新冠肺炎疫情期间媒体报道内容分析的洞见

S.M. Yasir Arafat , Sujita Kumar Kar , Vikas Menon , Charanya Kaliamoorthy , Srijeeta Mukherjee , Angi Alradie-Mohamed , Pawan Sharma , Marthoenis Marthoenis , Russell Kabir
{"title":"恐慌性抢购:新冠肺炎疫情期间媒体报道内容分析的洞见","authors":"S.M. Yasir Arafat ,&nbsp;Sujita Kumar Kar ,&nbsp;Vikas Menon ,&nbsp;Charanya Kaliamoorthy ,&nbsp;Srijeeta Mukherjee ,&nbsp;Angi Alradie-Mohamed ,&nbsp;Pawan Sharma ,&nbsp;Marthoenis Marthoenis ,&nbsp;Russell Kabir","doi":"10.1016/j.npbr.2020.07.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Panic buying is an emerging phenomenon observed during, but not restricted to, pandemic.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>We aimed to evaluate the nature, extent, and impact of panic buying as reported in the media.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study was conducted by collecting the information from the English media reports published till 22nd May 2020. A structured format was developed to collect data. Searching was done by using the keyword “panic buying”. We have excluded the social media posts discussing the panic buying.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The majority of media reporting was from the USA (40.7 %), and about 46 % of reports highlighted the scarce item. Approximately 82 % of the reports presented the causes of panic buying whereas almost 80 % report covered the impact of it. About 25.7 % of reports highlighted the rumor about panic buying and only 9.3 % of reports blamed the government. Only 27.1 % reports described the remedial measures, 30.8 % reports conferred the news on the psychology behind panic buying and 67.3 % news displayed the images of empty shelves.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>A high proportion of reports on panic buying have been found from the developed countries discussing the causes &amp; impact of panic buying on the basis of expert opinion.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49756,"journal":{"name":"Neurology Psychiatry and Brain Research","volume":"37 ","pages":"Pages 100-103"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.npbr.2020.07.002","citationCount":"124","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Panic buying: An insight from the content analysis of media reports during COVID-19 pandemic\",\"authors\":\"S.M. Yasir Arafat ,&nbsp;Sujita Kumar Kar ,&nbsp;Vikas Menon ,&nbsp;Charanya Kaliamoorthy ,&nbsp;Srijeeta Mukherjee ,&nbsp;Angi Alradie-Mohamed ,&nbsp;Pawan Sharma ,&nbsp;Marthoenis Marthoenis ,&nbsp;Russell Kabir\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.npbr.2020.07.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Panic buying is an emerging phenomenon observed during, but not restricted to, pandemic.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>We aimed to evaluate the nature, extent, and impact of panic buying as reported in the media.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study was conducted by collecting the information from the English media reports published till 22nd May 2020. A structured format was developed to collect data. Searching was done by using the keyword “panic buying”. We have excluded the social media posts discussing the panic buying.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The majority of media reporting was from the USA (40.7 %), and about 46 % of reports highlighted the scarce item. Approximately 82 % of the reports presented the causes of panic buying whereas almost 80 % report covered the impact of it. About 25.7 % of reports highlighted the rumor about panic buying and only 9.3 % of reports blamed the government. Only 27.1 % reports described the remedial measures, 30.8 % reports conferred the news on the psychology behind panic buying and 67.3 % news displayed the images of empty shelves.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>A high proportion of reports on panic buying have been found from the developed countries discussing the causes &amp; impact of panic buying on the basis of expert opinion.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49756,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurology Psychiatry and Brain Research\",\"volume\":\"37 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 100-103\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.npbr.2020.07.002\",\"citationCount\":\"124\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurology Psychiatry and Brain Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0941950020300944\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology Psychiatry and Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0941950020300944","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 124

摘要

恐慌性购买是在大流行期间观察到的一种新现象,但不限于此。我们的目的是评估媒体报道的恐慌性购买的性质、程度和影响。方法收集截至2020年5月22日发表的英文媒体报道资料。开发了一种结构化格式来收集数据。搜索的关键字是“抢购”。我们排除了社交媒体上讨论恐慌性购买的帖子。结果媒体报道以美国为主(40.7%),约46%的报道突出了稀缺项目。大约82%的报告介绍了恐慌性购买的原因,而几乎80%的报告涵盖了恐慌性购买的影响。大约25.7%的报道强调了恐慌性购买的谣言,只有9.3%的报道指责了政府。只有27.1%的报道描述了补救措施,30.8%的报道讲述了恐慌性购买背后的心理,67.3%的报道展示了空货架的图片。结论发达国家报道恐慌性购买的比例较高,讨论恐慌性购买的原因;恐慌性购买的影响基于专家意见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Panic buying: An insight from the content analysis of media reports during COVID-19 pandemic

Background

Panic buying is an emerging phenomenon observed during, but not restricted to, pandemic.

Aim

We aimed to evaluate the nature, extent, and impact of panic buying as reported in the media.

Methods

This study was conducted by collecting the information from the English media reports published till 22nd May 2020. A structured format was developed to collect data. Searching was done by using the keyword “panic buying”. We have excluded the social media posts discussing the panic buying.

Results

The majority of media reporting was from the USA (40.7 %), and about 46 % of reports highlighted the scarce item. Approximately 82 % of the reports presented the causes of panic buying whereas almost 80 % report covered the impact of it. About 25.7 % of reports highlighted the rumor about panic buying and only 9.3 % of reports blamed the government. Only 27.1 % reports described the remedial measures, 30.8 % reports conferred the news on the psychology behind panic buying and 67.3 % news displayed the images of empty shelves.

Conclusion

A high proportion of reports on panic buying have been found from the developed countries discussing the causes & impact of panic buying on the basis of expert opinion.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Neurology, Psychiatry & Brain Research publishes original papers and reviews in biological psychiatry, brain research, neurology, neuropsychiatry, neuropsychoimmunology, psychopathology, psychotherapy. The journal has a focus on international and interdisciplinary basic research with clinical relevance. Translational research is particularly appreciated. Authors are allowed to submit their manuscript in their native language as supplemental data to the English version. Neurology, Psychiatry & Brain Research is related to the oldest German speaking journal in this field, the Centralblatt fur Nervenheilkunde, Psychiatrie und gerichtliche Psychopathologie, founded in 1878. The tradition and idea of previous famous editors (Alois Alzheimer and Kurt Schneider among others) was continued in modernized form with Neurology, Psychiatry & Brain Research. Centralblatt was a journal of broad scope and relevance, now Neurology, Psychiatry & Brain Research represents a journal with translational and interdisciplinary perspective, focusing on clinically oriented research in psychiatry, neurology and neighboring fields of neurosciences and psychology/psychotherapy with a preference for biologically oriented research including basic research. Preference is given for papers from newly emerging fields, like clinical psychoimmunology/neuroimmunology, and ideas.
期刊最新文献
Seizure and COVID-19: Association and review of potential mechanism Mental health research in the lower-middle-income countries of Africa and Asia during the COVID-19 pandemic: A scoping review Acute changes in cerebral blood flow after single-infusion ketamine in major depression: A pilot study Depression and its association with quality of life among elderly: An elderly home- cross sectional study Quality of Thai media reporting of suicidal behavior: Compliance against the World Health Organization media guidelines
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1