后见之明是2020年

Q2 Social Sciences Journal of Food Science Education Pub Date : 2020-07-05 DOI:10.1111/1541-4329.12204
Shelly J. Schmidt
{"title":"后见之明是2020年","authors":"Shelly J. Schmidt","doi":"10.1111/1541-4329.12204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Here we stand, about five months into the COVID-19 global pandemic, and we already have an opportunity to look back and see what we can learn to improve the future. The specific future that I am referring to is the Fall 2020 semester. As of right now, I am not sure if colleges and universities will be 100% online, as was the case after spring break 2020, but I would bet that a sizable number of courses will either be offered completely online or at least include some form of an online component (Chronicle Staff <span>2020</span>). Therefore, it would behoove us to reflect on how we can improve the online experience we were required to rapidly develop and deliver to our students in Spring 2020, so that, ultimately, we can prepare our courses, ourselves, and our students for a better future – no matter what form of instruction we find ourselves needing to deliver in Fall 2020.</p><p>As the Spring 2020 semester was wrapping up, I was involved in a couple of Zoom meetings, the combination of which gave me pause. In the first Zoom meeting, a long-time professor was discussing how faculty members in his department were feeling pretty good about how they were able to successfully put the contents of their courses online in such a short period of time. In the second Zoom meeting, just a day later, I was listening to some students who were asked to share about how the transition to online learning went for them. The students first shared some positive features of their online learning experience, such as the opportunity to review recorded Zoom lectures; the convenience of online office hours; the helpfulness of weekly checklists sent out by their instructors; and the use, by some faculty, of breakout groups in Zoom. However, the students went on to also share a number of serious concerns with their experience, including feeling extremely disconnected from the instructor and other students in the class; feeling demotivated to attend or study for classes; having a few classes where only the PowerPoint slides were posted, but no further explanations or voice over lectures were provided; and lacking the technology needed in their new location to be successful. While pondering the juxtaposition between the faculty voice in the first Zoom meeting and the student voices in the second Zoom meeting, it dawned on me – <b>putting content online is one thing, learning from that content is quite another</b>. With only a moment's notice to transition their courses from face-to-face to online, faculty members, especially those who had never taught online before, were only thinking about one thing – how can I put my course content online? I can completely understand that frame of mind (Schmidt, <span>2020a</span>). However, now that we have time to reflect, at least a little, it seems intuitive that we need to include in our newly created online courses much more than content – as espoused by Cheelan BoLinn, from the Center of Innovations in Teaching and Learning on the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign campus, “Content is essential, but not sufficient.”</p><p>Just as with face-to-face courses, there are numerous best, go-to practices to include in our online courses (for example see Major, <span>2015</span> and Darby, <span>2020</span>). Since it is not possible (or desirable) to try and cover all of these in one editorial, what I would like to do is focus on three practices (some of which I have discussed in previous editorials as applied to face-to-face course delivery) that we can implement to help our students learn online. There are, of course, many, many more than three useful practices, but I was hoping to get us off to a good start with these three.</p><p>As I wrap-up this editorial, I would like to share one last overall thought about the significance of making student-content connections that I recently ran across in a blog post6 by Watanabe-Crockett (<span>2019</span>), which transcends the mode used in delivering our content. A few paragraphs into the blog post, the author makes the following statement: “It's absolutely impossible for our students to learn without experiencing connections to the concepts we teach them. We can achieve this through providing both context and relevance. Without connection there is no interest, and interest always precedes meaningful and authentic learning. So it's essential that we are making strong learning connections to help them develop the thinking habits they need to succeed.” I agree wholeheartedly with the author that meaningful and authentic learning is not possible without making relevant and personal connections. Sure, our students can remember the material long enough to pass, or maybe even score an A, on an exam; but learning that lasts a lifetime comes because of connections – relevant, useful, and personal connections.</p><p>In the next section of the blog post, Watanabe-Crockett (<span>2019</span>) does something really interesting, he adds awareness and connection to the base of Bloom's Taxonomy and labels them as Teaching (Figure 2), whereas the six elements of Bloom's Taxonomy (remembering to creating) are labeled as Learning. Watanabe-Crockett contends that we must start with <i>awareness</i> because we can't conceive of or recall anything that we are not aware of. Though this sounds quite obvious, we need to consider how crucial awareness is to our students’ learning and purposefully draw them into the content with our engaging teaching practices, which at the same time pulls them away from distractions. After awareness, the next job of the instructor is to help students make strong connections to the content. Once fostered, these connections ready our students to do their job – learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":44041,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Science Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/1541-4329.12204","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hindsight is 2020\",\"authors\":\"Shelly J. Schmidt\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1541-4329.12204\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Here we stand, about five months into the COVID-19 global pandemic, and we already have an opportunity to look back and see what we can learn to improve the future. The specific future that I am referring to is the Fall 2020 semester. As of right now, I am not sure if colleges and universities will be 100% online, as was the case after spring break 2020, but I would bet that a sizable number of courses will either be offered completely online or at least include some form of an online component (Chronicle Staff <span>2020</span>). Therefore, it would behoove us to reflect on how we can improve the online experience we were required to rapidly develop and deliver to our students in Spring 2020, so that, ultimately, we can prepare our courses, ourselves, and our students for a better future – no matter what form of instruction we find ourselves needing to deliver in Fall 2020.</p><p>As the Spring 2020 semester was wrapping up, I was involved in a couple of Zoom meetings, the combination of which gave me pause. In the first Zoom meeting, a long-time professor was discussing how faculty members in his department were feeling pretty good about how they were able to successfully put the contents of their courses online in such a short period of time. In the second Zoom meeting, just a day later, I was listening to some students who were asked to share about how the transition to online learning went for them. The students first shared some positive features of their online learning experience, such as the opportunity to review recorded Zoom lectures; the convenience of online office hours; the helpfulness of weekly checklists sent out by their instructors; and the use, by some faculty, of breakout groups in Zoom. However, the students went on to also share a number of serious concerns with their experience, including feeling extremely disconnected from the instructor and other students in the class; feeling demotivated to attend or study for classes; having a few classes where only the PowerPoint slides were posted, but no further explanations or voice over lectures were provided; and lacking the technology needed in their new location to be successful. While pondering the juxtaposition between the faculty voice in the first Zoom meeting and the student voices in the second Zoom meeting, it dawned on me – <b>putting content online is one thing, learning from that content is quite another</b>. With only a moment's notice to transition their courses from face-to-face to online, faculty members, especially those who had never taught online before, were only thinking about one thing – how can I put my course content online? I can completely understand that frame of mind (Schmidt, <span>2020a</span>). However, now that we have time to reflect, at least a little, it seems intuitive that we need to include in our newly created online courses much more than content – as espoused by Cheelan BoLinn, from the Center of Innovations in Teaching and Learning on the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign campus, “Content is essential, but not sufficient.”</p><p>Just as with face-to-face courses, there are numerous best, go-to practices to include in our online courses (for example see Major, <span>2015</span> and Darby, <span>2020</span>). Since it is not possible (or desirable) to try and cover all of these in one editorial, what I would like to do is focus on three practices (some of which I have discussed in previous editorials as applied to face-to-face course delivery) that we can implement to help our students learn online. There are, of course, many, many more than three useful practices, but I was hoping to get us off to a good start with these three.</p><p>As I wrap-up this editorial, I would like to share one last overall thought about the significance of making student-content connections that I recently ran across in a blog post6 by Watanabe-Crockett (<span>2019</span>), which transcends the mode used in delivering our content. A few paragraphs into the blog post, the author makes the following statement: “It's absolutely impossible for our students to learn without experiencing connections to the concepts we teach them. We can achieve this through providing both context and relevance. Without connection there is no interest, and interest always precedes meaningful and authentic learning. So it's essential that we are making strong learning connections to help them develop the thinking habits they need to succeed.” I agree wholeheartedly with the author that meaningful and authentic learning is not possible without making relevant and personal connections. Sure, our students can remember the material long enough to pass, or maybe even score an A, on an exam; but learning that lasts a lifetime comes because of connections – relevant, useful, and personal connections.</p><p>In the next section of the blog post, Watanabe-Crockett (<span>2019</span>) does something really interesting, he adds awareness and connection to the base of Bloom's Taxonomy and labels them as Teaching (Figure 2), whereas the six elements of Bloom's Taxonomy (remembering to creating) are labeled as Learning. Watanabe-Crockett contends that we must start with <i>awareness</i> because we can't conceive of or recall anything that we are not aware of. Though this sounds quite obvious, we need to consider how crucial awareness is to our students’ learning and purposefully draw them into the content with our engaging teaching practices, which at the same time pulls them away from distractions. After awareness, the next job of the instructor is to help students make strong connections to the content. Once fostered, these connections ready our students to do their job – learning.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Food Science Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/1541-4329.12204\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Food Science Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1541-4329.12204\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Science Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1541-4329.12204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

现在,2019冠状病毒病全球大流行已经过去了大约五个月,我们已经有机会回顾过去,看看我们可以从中学到什么来改善未来。我所指的具体未来是2020年秋季学期。截至目前,我不确定学院和大学是否会像2020年春假后那样100%在线,但我敢打赌,相当数量的课程要么完全在线提供,要么至少包括某种形式的在线组件(Chronicle Staff 2020)。因此,我们有必要反思如何改善在线体验,我们需要在2020年春季快速发展并交付给学生,这样,最终,我们可以为我们的课程,我们自己和我们的学生准备一个更美好的未来——无论我们发现自己需要在2020年秋季提供什么形式的教学。随着2020年春季学期的结束,我参加了几次Zoom会议,这些会议的结合让我犹豫了一下。在Zoom的第一次会议上,一位资深教授讨论了他所在院系的教职员工如何在如此短的时间内成功地将课程内容放到网上,他们感觉非常好。仅仅一天后,在Zoom的第二次会议上,我听到一些学生被要求分享他们是如何过渡到在线学习的。学生们首先分享了他们在线学习经历的一些积极特点,比如有机会复习Zoom录制的课程;网上办公时间的便利;老师每周发给他们的检查清单很有帮助;以及一些教师在Zoom中使用分组讨论。然而,学生们也分享了一些与他们的经历有关的严重问题,包括感觉与老师和班上其他学生极度脱节;感到没有动力去上课或学习;有几节课只发布PowerPoint幻灯片,但没有进一步的解释或讲课的声音;而且缺乏在新地方取得成功所需的技术。在思考第一次Zoom会议上教师的声音和第二次Zoom会议上学生的声音之间的对比时,我明白了——把内容放到网上是一回事,从内容中学习是另一回事。教师们,尤其是那些以前从未在网上教过课的人,只考虑一件事——我如何才能把我的课程内容放到网上?我完全可以理解这种心态(Schmidt, 2020a)。然而,现在我们有时间来反思,至少有一点,我们似乎直觉地认为,我们需要在我们新创建的在线课程中包含比内容更多的东西——正如伊利诺伊大学厄巴纳-香槟分校教学创新中心的Cheelan BoLinn所支持的那样,“内容是必要的,但不是充分的。”就像面对面的课程一样,我们的在线课程中也包含了许多最好的实践(例如,见Major, 2015和Darby, 2020)。由于在一篇社论中试图涵盖所有这些是不可能的(或不可取的),我想做的是关注三个实践(其中一些我在之前的社论中讨论过,适用于面对面的课程交付),我们可以实施,以帮助我们的学生在线学习。当然,有用的实践不止三种,但我希望这三种实践能让我们有一个良好的开端。在我总结这篇社论时,我想分享最后一个关于建立学生内容联系的重要性的总体想法,这是我最近在Watanabe-Crockett(2019)的一篇博客文章中看到的,它超越了我们在提供内容时使用的模式。在这篇博文的几段中,作者做了如下陈述:“如果我们的学生没有体验到与我们教给他们的概念的联系,他们是绝对不可能学习的。我们可以通过提供上下文和相关性来实现这一点。没有联系就没有兴趣,而兴趣总是先于有意义和真实的学习。因此,我们必须建立牢固的学习联系,帮助他们养成成功所需的思维习惯。”我完全同意作者的观点,没有相关的和个人的联系,有意义和真实的学习是不可能的。当然,我们的学生可以记住足够长的时间来通过考试,甚至可能在考试中得A;但是,持续一生的学习来自于联系——相关的、有用的和个人的联系。 在博客文章的下一部分中,Watanabe-Crockett(2019)做了一些非常有趣的事情,他将意识和联系添加到Bloom分类法的基础上,并将其标记为教学(图2),而Bloom分类法的六个元素(从记忆到创造)被标记为学习。Watanabe-Crockett认为,我们必须从意识开始,因为我们无法想象或回忆任何我们没有意识到的东西。虽然这听起来很明显,但我们需要考虑意识对学生的学习有多重要,并通过我们引人入胜的教学实践有目的地将他们吸引到内容中,同时使他们远离分心。意识到这一点后,教师的下一项工作是帮助学生与内容建立牢固的联系。一旦培养起来,这些联系就会让我们的学生做好准备去做他们的工作——学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Hindsight is 2020

Here we stand, about five months into the COVID-19 global pandemic, and we already have an opportunity to look back and see what we can learn to improve the future. The specific future that I am referring to is the Fall 2020 semester. As of right now, I am not sure if colleges and universities will be 100% online, as was the case after spring break 2020, but I would bet that a sizable number of courses will either be offered completely online or at least include some form of an online component (Chronicle Staff 2020). Therefore, it would behoove us to reflect on how we can improve the online experience we were required to rapidly develop and deliver to our students in Spring 2020, so that, ultimately, we can prepare our courses, ourselves, and our students for a better future – no matter what form of instruction we find ourselves needing to deliver in Fall 2020.

As the Spring 2020 semester was wrapping up, I was involved in a couple of Zoom meetings, the combination of which gave me pause. In the first Zoom meeting, a long-time professor was discussing how faculty members in his department were feeling pretty good about how they were able to successfully put the contents of their courses online in such a short period of time. In the second Zoom meeting, just a day later, I was listening to some students who were asked to share about how the transition to online learning went for them. The students first shared some positive features of their online learning experience, such as the opportunity to review recorded Zoom lectures; the convenience of online office hours; the helpfulness of weekly checklists sent out by their instructors; and the use, by some faculty, of breakout groups in Zoom. However, the students went on to also share a number of serious concerns with their experience, including feeling extremely disconnected from the instructor and other students in the class; feeling demotivated to attend or study for classes; having a few classes where only the PowerPoint slides were posted, but no further explanations or voice over lectures were provided; and lacking the technology needed in their new location to be successful. While pondering the juxtaposition between the faculty voice in the first Zoom meeting and the student voices in the second Zoom meeting, it dawned on me – putting content online is one thing, learning from that content is quite another. With only a moment's notice to transition their courses from face-to-face to online, faculty members, especially those who had never taught online before, were only thinking about one thing – how can I put my course content online? I can completely understand that frame of mind (Schmidt, 2020a). However, now that we have time to reflect, at least a little, it seems intuitive that we need to include in our newly created online courses much more than content – as espoused by Cheelan BoLinn, from the Center of Innovations in Teaching and Learning on the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign campus, “Content is essential, but not sufficient.”

Just as with face-to-face courses, there are numerous best, go-to practices to include in our online courses (for example see Major, 2015 and Darby, 2020). Since it is not possible (or desirable) to try and cover all of these in one editorial, what I would like to do is focus on three practices (some of which I have discussed in previous editorials as applied to face-to-face course delivery) that we can implement to help our students learn online. There are, of course, many, many more than three useful practices, but I was hoping to get us off to a good start with these three.

As I wrap-up this editorial, I would like to share one last overall thought about the significance of making student-content connections that I recently ran across in a blog post6 by Watanabe-Crockett (2019), which transcends the mode used in delivering our content. A few paragraphs into the blog post, the author makes the following statement: “It's absolutely impossible for our students to learn without experiencing connections to the concepts we teach them. We can achieve this through providing both context and relevance. Without connection there is no interest, and interest always precedes meaningful and authentic learning. So it's essential that we are making strong learning connections to help them develop the thinking habits they need to succeed.” I agree wholeheartedly with the author that meaningful and authentic learning is not possible without making relevant and personal connections. Sure, our students can remember the material long enough to pass, or maybe even score an A, on an exam; but learning that lasts a lifetime comes because of connections – relevant, useful, and personal connections.

In the next section of the blog post, Watanabe-Crockett (2019) does something really interesting, he adds awareness and connection to the base of Bloom's Taxonomy and labels them as Teaching (Figure 2), whereas the six elements of Bloom's Taxonomy (remembering to creating) are labeled as Learning. Watanabe-Crockett contends that we must start with awareness because we can't conceive of or recall anything that we are not aware of. Though this sounds quite obvious, we need to consider how crucial awareness is to our students’ learning and purposefully draw them into the content with our engaging teaching practices, which at the same time pulls them away from distractions. After awareness, the next job of the instructor is to help students make strong connections to the content. Once fostered, these connections ready our students to do their job – learning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Food Science Education
Journal of Food Science Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Institute of Food Technologists (IFT) publishes the Journal of Food Science Education (JFSE) to serve the interest of its members in the field of food science education at all levels. The journal is aimed at all those committed to the improvement of food science education, including primary, secondary, undergraduate and graduate, continuing, and workplace education. It serves as an international forum for scholarly and innovative development in all aspects of food science education for "teachers" (individuals who facilitate, mentor, or instruct) and "students" (individuals who are the focus of learning efforts).
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Flipped laboratory classes: Student performance and perceptions in undergraduate food science and technology Next steps Student perspectives of various learning approaches used in an undergraduate food science and technology subject Grab the opportunity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1