[老年人人格障碍的标准化评估:最新技术]

Q4 Nursing Tijdschrift voor Gerontologie en Geriatrie Pub Date : 2020-05-21 eCollection Date: 2020-06-04 DOI:10.36613/tgg.1875-6832/2020.02.03
Gina M P Rossi, Inge Debast, Sebastiaan P J van Alphen
{"title":"[老年人人格障碍的标准化评估:最新技术]","authors":"Gina M P Rossi,&nbsp;Inge Debast,&nbsp;Sebastiaan P J van Alphen","doi":"10.36613/tgg.1875-6832/2020.02.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The double ageing evolution in Europe is a tremendous challenge for health care. Older adults with a personality disorder place an additional burden: they have more somatic and psychiatric co-morbidity than those without a personality disorder. Moreover, they experience less quality of life than individuals without personality disorders. This is in sharp contrast to the dearth of empirical research concerning the construct of personality disorders in later life, the very limited amount of available diagnostic tools, criteria of classification systems like DSM not being attuned to the elderly context and the lack of age-neutrality of popular instruments to measure personality disorders. Therefore, in the Netherlands and Belgium a start was made to develop and validate age-specific instruments and to examine the applicability of the alternative dimensional-hybrid DSM-5 classification of personality disorders in older adults. These recent developments and how to apply them for a personalized assessment in older adults will be discussed. Finally, we advise a phased test-based diagnostic approach in which the above-mentioned instruments, combined with measures of adaptive features or more specific tests, can contribute to an assessment optimizing the balance between restricting the load for the older patient and still being sufficiently comprehensive to result in a personalized approach of the diagnostic process.</p>","PeriodicalId":39945,"journal":{"name":"Tijdschrift voor Gerontologie en Geriatrie","volume":"51 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Standardized assessment of personality disorders in older adults: State-of-the-art.]\",\"authors\":\"Gina M P Rossi,&nbsp;Inge Debast,&nbsp;Sebastiaan P J van Alphen\",\"doi\":\"10.36613/tgg.1875-6832/2020.02.03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The double ageing evolution in Europe is a tremendous challenge for health care. Older adults with a personality disorder place an additional burden: they have more somatic and psychiatric co-morbidity than those without a personality disorder. Moreover, they experience less quality of life than individuals without personality disorders. This is in sharp contrast to the dearth of empirical research concerning the construct of personality disorders in later life, the very limited amount of available diagnostic tools, criteria of classification systems like DSM not being attuned to the elderly context and the lack of age-neutrality of popular instruments to measure personality disorders. Therefore, in the Netherlands and Belgium a start was made to develop and validate age-specific instruments and to examine the applicability of the alternative dimensional-hybrid DSM-5 classification of personality disorders in older adults. These recent developments and how to apply them for a personalized assessment in older adults will be discussed. Finally, we advise a phased test-based diagnostic approach in which the above-mentioned instruments, combined with measures of adaptive features or more specific tests, can contribute to an assessment optimizing the balance between restricting the load for the older patient and still being sufficiently comprehensive to result in a personalized approach of the diagnostic process.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tijdschrift voor Gerontologie en Geriatrie\",\"volume\":\"51 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tijdschrift voor Gerontologie en Geriatrie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36613/tgg.1875-6832/2020.02.03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/6/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tijdschrift voor Gerontologie en Geriatrie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36613/tgg.1875-6832/2020.02.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/6/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

欧洲的双重老龄化演变对医疗保健构成了巨大挑战。患有人格障碍的老年人带来了额外的负担:他们比没有人格障碍的老年人有更多的躯体和精神上的合并症。此外,与没有人格障碍的人相比,他们的生活质量更差。这与缺乏关于晚年人格障碍结构的实证研究形成鲜明对比,可用的诊断工具数量非常有限,分类系统的标准如DSM不适合老年人的背景,以及缺乏年龄中立的流行工具来测量人格障碍。因此,在荷兰和比利时,开始开发和验证针对年龄的工具,并检查DSM-5人格障碍的替代维度混合分类在老年人中的适用性。这些最新的发展以及如何将其应用于老年人的个性化评估将被讨论。最后,我们建议采用分阶段的基于测试的诊断方法,其中上述仪器与适应性特征测量或更具体的测试相结合,可以帮助评估优化限制老年患者负荷之间的平衡,并且仍然足够全面,从而产生个性化的诊断过程方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Standardized assessment of personality disorders in older adults: State-of-the-art.]

The double ageing evolution in Europe is a tremendous challenge for health care. Older adults with a personality disorder place an additional burden: they have more somatic and psychiatric co-morbidity than those without a personality disorder. Moreover, they experience less quality of life than individuals without personality disorders. This is in sharp contrast to the dearth of empirical research concerning the construct of personality disorders in later life, the very limited amount of available diagnostic tools, criteria of classification systems like DSM not being attuned to the elderly context and the lack of age-neutrality of popular instruments to measure personality disorders. Therefore, in the Netherlands and Belgium a start was made to develop and validate age-specific instruments and to examine the applicability of the alternative dimensional-hybrid DSM-5 classification of personality disorders in older adults. These recent developments and how to apply them for a personalized assessment in older adults will be discussed. Finally, we advise a phased test-based diagnostic approach in which the above-mentioned instruments, combined with measures of adaptive features or more specific tests, can contribute to an assessment optimizing the balance between restricting the load for the older patient and still being sufficiently comprehensive to result in a personalized approach of the diagnostic process.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
期刊最新文献
Ervaringen met COVID-19 maatregelen onder oudere Nederlandse thuiswonende migranten [Evaluation of an information booklet on end-of-life care in dementia: a mixed-methods study assessing the preferences of family caregivers and healthcare professionals]. Onderzoek naar kwetsbaarheid bij ouderen: waar staan we 15 jaar na het Nationaal Programma Ouderenzorg? [The tradeoff between an open or closed unit for residents with dementia: a qualitative study]. [Experiences, wishes and needs of patients with regard to patient participation during geriatric rehabilitation].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1