静脉麻醉与吸入麻醉对开腹术后恶心呕吐的比较:一项随机临床研究

Amir Ahmadzadeh Amiri , Kasra Karvandian , Mohammad Ashouri , Mojgan Rahimi , Ali Ahmadzadeh Amiri
{"title":"静脉麻醉与吸入麻醉对开腹术后恶心呕吐的比较:一项随机临床研究","authors":"Amir Ahmadzadeh Amiri ,&nbsp;Kasra Karvandian ,&nbsp;Mohammad Ashouri ,&nbsp;Mojgan Rahimi ,&nbsp;Ali Ahmadzadeh Amiri","doi":"10.1016/j.bjan.2020.04.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV) is a multifactorial surgical complication with an unclear underlying cause. Anesthetic methods, patients’ characteristics and the type of surgery are considered as factors affecting PONV. This study was designed to compare the effect of inhalational and intravenous anesthesia in abdominal surgery on the incidence and severity of PONV.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A single‐blinded prospective randomized clinical trial on 105 patients aged 18<!--> <!-->−<!--> <!-->65 years was carried out. Patients were divided in two groups of Total Intravenous Anesthesia (TIVA) and Inhalational anesthesia. The incidence and severity of PONV were examined at 0, 2, 6, 12, and 24<!--> <!-->hours after the surgery. The use of a rescue antiemetic was also evaluated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Fifty point nine percent of the patients in the inhalation group and 17.3% of the patients in the intravenous group developed PONV (<em>p</em> &lt;<!--> <!-->0.001). The incidence of vomiting was reported in 11.3% of the Inhalational group and 3.8% of the TIVA group (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.15), and 24.5% of patients in the Inhalation group and 9.6% of patients in the intravenous group needed an antiemetic medication (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.043).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting and the need for administration of an antiemetic rescue drug, and the severity of nausea in patients were significantly lower in the TIVA group.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21261,"journal":{"name":"Revista brasileira de anestesiologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bjan.2020.04.019","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparação entre anestesia intravenosa e inalatória na náusea e vômito pós‐operatórios em laparotomia: estudo clínico randomizado\",\"authors\":\"Amir Ahmadzadeh Amiri ,&nbsp;Kasra Karvandian ,&nbsp;Mohammad Ashouri ,&nbsp;Mojgan Rahimi ,&nbsp;Ali Ahmadzadeh Amiri\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bjan.2020.04.019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV) is a multifactorial surgical complication with an unclear underlying cause. Anesthetic methods, patients’ characteristics and the type of surgery are considered as factors affecting PONV. This study was designed to compare the effect of inhalational and intravenous anesthesia in abdominal surgery on the incidence and severity of PONV.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A single‐blinded prospective randomized clinical trial on 105 patients aged 18<!--> <!-->−<!--> <!-->65 years was carried out. Patients were divided in two groups of Total Intravenous Anesthesia (TIVA) and Inhalational anesthesia. The incidence and severity of PONV were examined at 0, 2, 6, 12, and 24<!--> <!-->hours after the surgery. The use of a rescue antiemetic was also evaluated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Fifty point nine percent of the patients in the inhalation group and 17.3% of the patients in the intravenous group developed PONV (<em>p</em> &lt;<!--> <!-->0.001). The incidence of vomiting was reported in 11.3% of the Inhalational group and 3.8% of the TIVA group (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.15), and 24.5% of patients in the Inhalation group and 9.6% of patients in the intravenous group needed an antiemetic medication (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.043).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting and the need for administration of an antiemetic rescue drug, and the severity of nausea in patients were significantly lower in the TIVA group.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21261,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista brasileira de anestesiologia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bjan.2020.04.019\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista brasileira de anestesiologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034709420304049\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista brasileira de anestesiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034709420304049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景术后恶心呕吐(PONV)是一种多因素的手术并发症,病因不明。麻醉方法、患者特点和手术类型是影响PONV的因素。本研究旨在比较腹部手术中吸入麻醉和静脉麻醉对PONV发生率和严重程度的影响。方法对105例18 ~ 65岁的患者进行单盲前瞻性随机临床试验。患者分为全静脉麻醉组(TIVA)和吸入麻醉组。分别于术后0、2、6、12和24小时检查PONV的发生率和严重程度。还评估了抢救止吐剂的使用。结果吸入组和静脉注射组分别有50.9%和17.3%的患者发生了PONV (p <0.001)。吸入组呕吐发生率为11.3%,TIVA组为3.8% (p = 0.15),吸入组24.5%,静脉注射组9.6%需要止吐药物(p = 0.043)。结论TIVA组患者术后恶心呕吐发生率、止吐抢救药物使用需求及恶心严重程度均明显降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparação entre anestesia intravenosa e inalatória na náusea e vômito pós‐operatórios em laparotomia: estudo clínico randomizado

Background

Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV) is a multifactorial surgical complication with an unclear underlying cause. Anesthetic methods, patients’ characteristics and the type of surgery are considered as factors affecting PONV. This study was designed to compare the effect of inhalational and intravenous anesthesia in abdominal surgery on the incidence and severity of PONV.

Methods

A single‐blinded prospective randomized clinical trial on 105 patients aged 18  65 years was carried out. Patients were divided in two groups of Total Intravenous Anesthesia (TIVA) and Inhalational anesthesia. The incidence and severity of PONV were examined at 0, 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours after the surgery. The use of a rescue antiemetic was also evaluated.

Results

Fifty point nine percent of the patients in the inhalation group and 17.3% of the patients in the intravenous group developed PONV (p < 0.001). The incidence of vomiting was reported in 11.3% of the Inhalational group and 3.8% of the TIVA group (p = 0.15), and 24.5% of patients in the Inhalation group and 9.6% of patients in the intravenous group needed an antiemetic medication (p = 0.043).

Conclusion

The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting and the need for administration of an antiemetic rescue drug, and the severity of nausea in patients were significantly lower in the TIVA group.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: The Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology is the official journal of the Brazilian Anesthesiology Society. It publishes articles classified into the following categories: -Scientific articles (clinical or experimental trials)- Clinical information (case reports)- Reviews- Letters to the Editor- Editorials. The journal focuses primarily on clinical trials, with scope on clinical practice, aiming at providing applied tools to the anesthesiologist and critical care physician. The Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology accepts articles exclusively forwarded to it. Articles already published in other journals are not accepted. All articles proposed for publication are previously submitted to the analysis of two or more members of the Editorial Board or other specialized consultants.
期刊最新文献
Atualização sobre reações de hipersensibilidade perioperatória: documento conjunto da Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA) e Associação Brasileira de Alergia e Imunologia (ASBAI) – Parte II: etiologia e diagnóstico Propofol‐cetamina versus dexmedetomidina‐cetamina para sedação durante endoscopia digestiva alta em pacientes pediátricos: estudo clínico randomizado Comparação entre morfina subaracnoidea e bloqueio do nervo femoral para analgesia após reconstrução ligamentar de joelho: estudo clínico randomizado Sequência de segurança de intubação: o algoritmo 10 “Ps” e ferramenta cognitiva para manuseio de vias aéreas em pacientes com COVID‐19 Dexametasona perineural em bloqueio de plexo braquial interescalênico com levobupivacaína guiado por ultrassonografia para artroscopia de ombro em regime ambulatorial: ensaio clínico controlado e randomizado
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1