教育1型糖尿病儿童胰岛素自我注射的治疗性游戏:发展中国家的试点试验。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING Journal for Specialists in Pediatric Nursing Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2020-09-18 DOI:10.1111/jspn.12309
Rebecca O La Banca, Lori M B Laffel, Lisa K Volkening, Valéria C Sparapani, Emilia C de Carvalho, Lucila C Nascimento
{"title":"教育1型糖尿病儿童胰岛素自我注射的治疗性游戏:发展中国家的试点试验。","authors":"Rebecca O La Banca,&nbsp;Lori M B Laffel,&nbsp;Lisa K Volkening,&nbsp;Valéria C Sparapani,&nbsp;Emilia C de Carvalho,&nbsp;Lucila C Nascimento","doi":"10.1111/jspn.12309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Child participation in type 1 diabetes (T1D) self-care is needed in developing countries due to a lack of resources, especially during the school day. This pilot study evaluated the feasibility of a therapeutic play intervention (ITP) versus standard education (SE) on the ability of children with T1D to correctly perform insulin injection technique.</p><p><strong>Design and methods: </strong>Children with T1D (7-12 years) were recruited at two diabetes clinics in Brazil and randomized to ITP or SE. Registered nurses received protocol training to deliver the intervention and perform data collection. ITP group received an education that included a story about a child with T1D who self-injects insulin at school; SE group received routine clinic-based education. Preintervention, children were video-recorded giving insulin injections to a doll; postintervention, children were rerecorded giving the doll an injection. The research team reviewed the videos and assessed the injection technique using validated checklists. Parents reported children's self-injection practices at baseline and 30 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Children (N = 20, 40% male) were 9.6 ± 1.3 years old and had T1D for 3.6 ± 2.3 years; HbA1c was 9.1 ± 2.0%; 20% of ITP and 50% of SE children used syringes (vs. pens) for injections. At baseline, 80% of both groups knew how to self-inject; most were taught by a parent/relative. Injection technique scores were low in both groups; ITP group increased their scores significantly postintervention. Practices of self-injection did not change in either group after 30 days.</p><p><strong>Practice implications: </strong>The play-based intervention appeared to improve the injection technique in the short-term. Pilot findings support the development of a larger trial to evaluate the effectiveness of ITP on educating children on insulin injections.</p>","PeriodicalId":54900,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Specialists in Pediatric Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/jspn.12309","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Therapeutic play to teach children with type 1 diabetes insulin self-injection: A pilot trial in a developing country.\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca O La Banca,&nbsp;Lori M B Laffel,&nbsp;Lisa K Volkening,&nbsp;Valéria C Sparapani,&nbsp;Emilia C de Carvalho,&nbsp;Lucila C Nascimento\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jspn.12309\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Child participation in type 1 diabetes (T1D) self-care is needed in developing countries due to a lack of resources, especially during the school day. This pilot study evaluated the feasibility of a therapeutic play intervention (ITP) versus standard education (SE) on the ability of children with T1D to correctly perform insulin injection technique.</p><p><strong>Design and methods: </strong>Children with T1D (7-12 years) were recruited at two diabetes clinics in Brazil and randomized to ITP or SE. Registered nurses received protocol training to deliver the intervention and perform data collection. ITP group received an education that included a story about a child with T1D who self-injects insulin at school; SE group received routine clinic-based education. Preintervention, children were video-recorded giving insulin injections to a doll; postintervention, children were rerecorded giving the doll an injection. The research team reviewed the videos and assessed the injection technique using validated checklists. Parents reported children's self-injection practices at baseline and 30 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Children (N = 20, 40% male) were 9.6 ± 1.3 years old and had T1D for 3.6 ± 2.3 years; HbA1c was 9.1 ± 2.0%; 20% of ITP and 50% of SE children used syringes (vs. pens) for injections. At baseline, 80% of both groups knew how to self-inject; most were taught by a parent/relative. Injection technique scores were low in both groups; ITP group increased their scores significantly postintervention. Practices of self-injection did not change in either group after 30 days.</p><p><strong>Practice implications: </strong>The play-based intervention appeared to improve the injection technique in the short-term. Pilot findings support the development of a larger trial to evaluate the effectiveness of ITP on educating children on insulin injections.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54900,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal for Specialists in Pediatric Nursing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/jspn.12309\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal for Specialists in Pediatric Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jspn.12309\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/9/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Specialists in Pediatric Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jspn.12309","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/9/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目的:由于缺乏资源,发展中国家需要儿童参与1型糖尿病(T1D)的自我护理,特别是在上学期间。本初步研究评估了治疗性游戏干预(ITP)与标准教育(SE)对T1D儿童正确使用胰岛素注射技术的能力的可行性。设计和方法:在巴西的两家糖尿病诊所招募7-12岁的T1D儿童,随机分为ITP组和SE组。注册护士接受了方案培训,以提供干预和执行数据收集。ITP组接受的教育包括一个T1D儿童在学校自我注射胰岛素的故事;SE组接受常规临床教育。在干预前,孩子们给洋娃娃注射胰岛素的过程被录了下来;干预后,记录下儿童给娃娃注射的过程。研究小组回顾了视频,并使用经过验证的清单评估了注射技术。父母报告了孩子在基线和30天的自我注射行为。结果:患儿20例,男性占40%,年龄9.6±1.3岁,T1D时间3.6±2.3年;HbA1c为9.1±2.0%;20%的ITP儿童和50%的SE儿童使用注射器(相对于笔)进行注射。在基线时,两组中80%的人都知道如何自我注射;大多数是由父母或亲戚教的。两组患者注射技术评分均较低;干预后ITP组得分显著提高。30天后,两组的自我注射方式均无变化。实践启示:以游戏为基础的干预似乎在短期内改善了注射技术。试点结果支持开展更大规模的试验,以评估ITP在教育儿童胰岛素注射方面的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Therapeutic play to teach children with type 1 diabetes insulin self-injection: A pilot trial in a developing country.

Purpose: Child participation in type 1 diabetes (T1D) self-care is needed in developing countries due to a lack of resources, especially during the school day. This pilot study evaluated the feasibility of a therapeutic play intervention (ITP) versus standard education (SE) on the ability of children with T1D to correctly perform insulin injection technique.

Design and methods: Children with T1D (7-12 years) were recruited at two diabetes clinics in Brazil and randomized to ITP or SE. Registered nurses received protocol training to deliver the intervention and perform data collection. ITP group received an education that included a story about a child with T1D who self-injects insulin at school; SE group received routine clinic-based education. Preintervention, children were video-recorded giving insulin injections to a doll; postintervention, children were rerecorded giving the doll an injection. The research team reviewed the videos and assessed the injection technique using validated checklists. Parents reported children's self-injection practices at baseline and 30 days.

Results: Children (N = 20, 40% male) were 9.6 ± 1.3 years old and had T1D for 3.6 ± 2.3 years; HbA1c was 9.1 ± 2.0%; 20% of ITP and 50% of SE children used syringes (vs. pens) for injections. At baseline, 80% of both groups knew how to self-inject; most were taught by a parent/relative. Injection technique scores were low in both groups; ITP group increased their scores significantly postintervention. Practices of self-injection did not change in either group after 30 days.

Practice implications: The play-based intervention appeared to improve the injection technique in the short-term. Pilot findings support the development of a larger trial to evaluate the effectiveness of ITP on educating children on insulin injections.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
27
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Linking science and practice by publishing evidence-based information on pediatric nursing and answering the question, ''How might this information affect nursing practice?'' The Journal for Specialists in Pediatric Nursing (JSPN) is the international evidence-based practice journal for nurses who specialize in the care of children and families. JSPN bridges the gap between research and practice by publishing peer-reviewed reliable, clinically relevant, and readily applicable evidence. The journal integrates the best evidence with pediatric nurses'' passion for achieving the best outcomes. The journal values interdisciplinary perspectives and publishes a wide variety of peer-reviewed papers on clinically relevant topics.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Identifying actions taken by health care professionals during procedures involving children with autism spectrum disorders in a high technological environment: Using critical incident technique Factors influencing job stress in pediatric nurses during the pandemic period: Focusing on fatigue, pediatric nurse−parent partnership Issue Information Sexuality education for school-aged children and adolescents: A concept analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1