有或无子痫前期孕妇内啡肽通路基因的DNA甲基化。

IF 3.2 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY Epigenetics Insights Pub Date : 2020-10-09 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1177/2516865720959682
Allison H Rietze, Yvette P Conley, Dianxu Ren, Cindy M Anderson, James M Roberts, Arun Jeyabalan, Carl A Hubel, Mandy J Schmella
{"title":"有或无子痫前期孕妇内啡肽通路基因的DNA甲基化。","authors":"Allison H Rietze,&nbsp;Yvette P Conley,&nbsp;Dianxu Ren,&nbsp;Cindy M Anderson,&nbsp;James M Roberts,&nbsp;Arun Jeyabalan,&nbsp;Carl A Hubel,&nbsp;Mandy J Schmella","doi":"10.1177/2516865720959682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We compared blood-based DNA methylation levels of endoglin (<i>ENG</i>) and transforming growth factor beta receptor 2 (<i>TGFβR2</i>) gene promoter regions between women with clinically-overt preeclampsia and women with uncomplicated, normotensive pregnancies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used EpiTect Methyl II PCR Assays to evaluate DNA methylation of CpG islands located in promoter regions of <i>ENG</i> (CpG Island 114642) and <i>TGFβR2</i> (CpG Island 110111). Preeclampsia was diagnosed based on blood pressure, protein, and uric acid criteria. N = 21 nulliparous preeclampsia case participants were 1:1 frequency matched to N = 21 nulliparous normotensive control participants on gestational age at sample collection (±2 weeks), smoking status, and labor status at sample collection. Methylation values were compared between case and control participant groups [(<i>ENG</i> subset: n = 20 (9 cases, 11 controls); <i>TGFβR2</i> subset: n = 28 (15 cases, 13 controls)].</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of the preeclampsia cases delivered at ⩾34 weeks' gestation (83%). Average methylation levels for <i>ENG</i> ([M ± (SD)]; Case Participant Group = 6.54% ± 4.57 versus Control Participant group = 4.81% ± 5.08; <i>P</i> = .102) and <i>TGFβR2</i> (Case Participant Group = 1.50% ± 1.37 vs Control Participant Group = 1.70% ± 1.40; <i>P</i> = .695) promoter CpG islands did not differ significantly between the participant groups. Removal of 2 extreme outliers in the <i>ENG</i> analytic subset revealed a trend between levels of <i>ENG</i> methylation and pregnancy outcome (Case Participant Group = 5.17% ± 2.16 vs Control Participant Group = 3.36% ± 1.73; <i>P</i> = .062).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Additional epigenetic studies that include larger sample sizes, investigate preeclampsia subtypes, and capture methylation status of CpG island shores and shelves are needed to further inform us of the potential role that <i>ENG</i> and <i>TGFβR2</i> DNA methylation plays in preeclampsia pathophysiology.</p>","PeriodicalId":41996,"journal":{"name":"Epigenetics Insights","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2516865720959682","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DNA Methylation of Endoglin Pathway Genes in Pregnant Women With and Without Preeclampsia.\",\"authors\":\"Allison H Rietze,&nbsp;Yvette P Conley,&nbsp;Dianxu Ren,&nbsp;Cindy M Anderson,&nbsp;James M Roberts,&nbsp;Arun Jeyabalan,&nbsp;Carl A Hubel,&nbsp;Mandy J Schmella\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/2516865720959682\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We compared blood-based DNA methylation levels of endoglin (<i>ENG</i>) and transforming growth factor beta receptor 2 (<i>TGFβR2</i>) gene promoter regions between women with clinically-overt preeclampsia and women with uncomplicated, normotensive pregnancies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used EpiTect Methyl II PCR Assays to evaluate DNA methylation of CpG islands located in promoter regions of <i>ENG</i> (CpG Island 114642) and <i>TGFβR2</i> (CpG Island 110111). Preeclampsia was diagnosed based on blood pressure, protein, and uric acid criteria. N = 21 nulliparous preeclampsia case participants were 1:1 frequency matched to N = 21 nulliparous normotensive control participants on gestational age at sample collection (±2 weeks), smoking status, and labor status at sample collection. Methylation values were compared between case and control participant groups [(<i>ENG</i> subset: n = 20 (9 cases, 11 controls); <i>TGFβR2</i> subset: n = 28 (15 cases, 13 controls)].</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of the preeclampsia cases delivered at ⩾34 weeks' gestation (83%). Average methylation levels for <i>ENG</i> ([M ± (SD)]; Case Participant Group = 6.54% ± 4.57 versus Control Participant group = 4.81% ± 5.08; <i>P</i> = .102) and <i>TGFβR2</i> (Case Participant Group = 1.50% ± 1.37 vs Control Participant Group = 1.70% ± 1.40; <i>P</i> = .695) promoter CpG islands did not differ significantly between the participant groups. Removal of 2 extreme outliers in the <i>ENG</i> analytic subset revealed a trend between levels of <i>ENG</i> methylation and pregnancy outcome (Case Participant Group = 5.17% ± 2.16 vs Control Participant Group = 3.36% ± 1.73; <i>P</i> = .062).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Additional epigenetic studies that include larger sample sizes, investigate preeclampsia subtypes, and capture methylation status of CpG island shores and shelves are needed to further inform us of the potential role that <i>ENG</i> and <i>TGFβR2</i> DNA methylation plays in preeclampsia pathophysiology.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":41996,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epigenetics Insights\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2516865720959682\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epigenetics Insights\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/2516865720959682\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epigenetics Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2516865720959682","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较临床表现明显的先兆子痫妇女和正常妊娠妇女血液中内啡肽(ENG)和转化生长因子β受体2 (TGFβR2)基因启动子区的DNA甲基化水平。方法:采用EpiTect Methyl II PCR检测基因ENG启动子区CpG岛(CpG岛114642)和TGFβR2启动子区CpG岛(CpG岛110111)的DNA甲基化。根据血压、蛋白质和尿酸标准诊断子痫前期。在采集样本时的胎龄(±2周)、吸烟状况和采集样本时的劳动状况方面,N = 21例未产先兆子痫患者与N = 21例未产正常血压对照组的比例为1:1。比较病例组和对照组之间的甲基化值[(ENG子集:n = 20(9例,11例对照);tgf - β r2亚群:n = 28(15例,13例对照)]。结果:大多数子痫前期病例在妊娠大于或小于34周时分娩(83%)。ENG平均甲基化水平([M±(SD)];病例组= 6.54%±4.57 vs对照组= 4.81%±5.08;P = 0.102)和TGFβR2(病例组= 1.50%±1.37 vs对照组= 1.70%±1.40;P = .695)启动子CpG岛在参与者组间无显著差异。在ENG分析子集中去除2个极端异常值揭示了ENG甲基化水平与妊娠结局之间的趋势(病例组= 5.17%±2.16 vs对照组= 3.36%±1.73;p = .062)。结论:需要更多的表观遗传学研究,包括更大的样本量,调查子痫前期亚型,并捕获CpG岛海岸和架子的甲基化状态,以进一步告知我们ENG和TGFβR2 DNA甲基化在子痫前期病理生理中的潜在作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
DNA Methylation of Endoglin Pathway Genes in Pregnant Women With and Without Preeclampsia.

Objective: We compared blood-based DNA methylation levels of endoglin (ENG) and transforming growth factor beta receptor 2 (TGFβR2) gene promoter regions between women with clinically-overt preeclampsia and women with uncomplicated, normotensive pregnancies.

Methods: We used EpiTect Methyl II PCR Assays to evaluate DNA methylation of CpG islands located in promoter regions of ENG (CpG Island 114642) and TGFβR2 (CpG Island 110111). Preeclampsia was diagnosed based on blood pressure, protein, and uric acid criteria. N = 21 nulliparous preeclampsia case participants were 1:1 frequency matched to N = 21 nulliparous normotensive control participants on gestational age at sample collection (±2 weeks), smoking status, and labor status at sample collection. Methylation values were compared between case and control participant groups [(ENG subset: n = 20 (9 cases, 11 controls); TGFβR2 subset: n = 28 (15 cases, 13 controls)].

Results: The majority of the preeclampsia cases delivered at ⩾34 weeks' gestation (83%). Average methylation levels for ENG ([M ± (SD)]; Case Participant Group = 6.54% ± 4.57 versus Control Participant group = 4.81% ± 5.08; P = .102) and TGFβR2 (Case Participant Group = 1.50% ± 1.37 vs Control Participant Group = 1.70% ± 1.40; P = .695) promoter CpG islands did not differ significantly between the participant groups. Removal of 2 extreme outliers in the ENG analytic subset revealed a trend between levels of ENG methylation and pregnancy outcome (Case Participant Group = 5.17% ± 2.16 vs Control Participant Group = 3.36% ± 1.73; P = .062).

Conclusion: Additional epigenetic studies that include larger sample sizes, investigate preeclampsia subtypes, and capture methylation status of CpG island shores and shelves are needed to further inform us of the potential role that ENG and TGFβR2 DNA methylation plays in preeclampsia pathophysiology.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Epigenetics Insights
Epigenetics Insights GENETICS & HEREDITY-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Epigenetics Mechanisms of Honeybees: Secrets of Royal Jelly. Circular RNA in Multiple Sclerosis: Pathogenicity and Potential Biomarker Development: A Systematic Review. Associations Between Epigenetic Age Acceleration and microRNA Expression Among U.S. Firefighters. Subacute and Chronic Spinal Cord Injury: A Scoping Review of Epigenetics and Secondary Health Conditions. DNA Methylation in Cancer: Epigenetic View of Dietary and Lifestyle Factors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1