比较 Tegatard 和 Tegretol 作为单一疗法对伴有或不伴有继发性全身泛化的局灶性癫痫发作患者的疗效。

IF 1.4 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY American journal of clinical and experimental immunology Pub Date : 2020-10-15 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01
Mohammad Reza Najafi, Mohammad Amin Najafi, Ramin Shayan-Moghadam, Zahra Saadatpour, Keyvan Ghadimi
{"title":"比较 Tegatard 和 Tegretol 作为单一疗法对伴有或不伴有继发性全身泛化的局灶性癫痫发作患者的疗效。","authors":"Mohammad Reza Najafi, Mohammad Amin Najafi, Ramin Shayan-Moghadam, Zahra Saadatpour, Keyvan Ghadimi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Carbamazepine is a first line treatment for focal epilepsy. Tegretol and Tegatard are two trade name of Carbamazepine. Tegretol is produced by Novartis Pharmaceutical Company, Switzerland. Recently, Raha pharmaceutical Company in Iran has produced CBZ which trade named is Tegatard. Extended usage of Tegatard instead of Tegretol has economic benefits for Iranian families. In this clinical trial, we aimed to compare therapeutic efficacy and safety of Tegretol and Tegatard in patients suffering from focal seizures with or without secondary generalization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>200 patients with provoked or non-provoked focal seizure with or without secondary generalization were screened and 180 patients were fulfilled the criteria to enter this double blinded clinical trial study. Patients were divided into two groups, the first group (A) received Tegretol and the second group (B) Tegatard. Carbamazepine (CBZ) was prescribed with doses 10-20 mg/kg every 12 hours by neurologists. The patients were visited after 1, 3 and 6 months and the side effects and lab data in patients were investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients were divided into two groups, 88 patients in group A (Tegretol) (50 males and 38 females) and 92 in group B (Tegatard) (51 males and 41 females). Mean age of patients was 35.39±11.17 years. There was no significant difference according to age and gender, Carbamazepine dosage, EEG recording, neuroimaging change and adverse effects of antiepileptic drug between two groups (P>0.05). Regarding the drug efficacy, in group A and B, 60 (68%) and 58 (63%) patients were seizure free after 6 month follow up; respectively. The differences between two groups were not statistically significant (<i>P</i> value =0.46).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Tegatard is an effective drug with similar efficacy, similar side effects and cost-effectiveness compared with Tegretol and could be used widely when indicated.</p>","PeriodicalId":72163,"journal":{"name":"American journal of clinical and experimental immunology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7677516/pdf/ajcei0009-0058.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the efficacy of Tegatard and Tegretol as a monotherapy in patients with focal seizure with or without secondary generalization.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Reza Najafi, Mohammad Amin Najafi, Ramin Shayan-Moghadam, Zahra Saadatpour, Keyvan Ghadimi\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Carbamazepine is a first line treatment for focal epilepsy. Tegretol and Tegatard are two trade name of Carbamazepine. Tegretol is produced by Novartis Pharmaceutical Company, Switzerland. Recently, Raha pharmaceutical Company in Iran has produced CBZ which trade named is Tegatard. Extended usage of Tegatard instead of Tegretol has economic benefits for Iranian families. In this clinical trial, we aimed to compare therapeutic efficacy and safety of Tegretol and Tegatard in patients suffering from focal seizures with or without secondary generalization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>200 patients with provoked or non-provoked focal seizure with or without secondary generalization were screened and 180 patients were fulfilled the criteria to enter this double blinded clinical trial study. Patients were divided into two groups, the first group (A) received Tegretol and the second group (B) Tegatard. Carbamazepine (CBZ) was prescribed with doses 10-20 mg/kg every 12 hours by neurologists. The patients were visited after 1, 3 and 6 months and the side effects and lab data in patients were investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients were divided into two groups, 88 patients in group A (Tegretol) (50 males and 38 females) and 92 in group B (Tegatard) (51 males and 41 females). Mean age of patients was 35.39±11.17 years. There was no significant difference according to age and gender, Carbamazepine dosage, EEG recording, neuroimaging change and adverse effects of antiepileptic drug between two groups (P>0.05). Regarding the drug efficacy, in group A and B, 60 (68%) and 58 (63%) patients were seizure free after 6 month follow up; respectively. The differences between two groups were not statistically significant (<i>P</i> value =0.46).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Tegatard is an effective drug with similar efficacy, similar side effects and cost-effectiveness compared with Tegretol and could be used widely when indicated.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72163,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of clinical and experimental immunology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7677516/pdf/ajcei0009-0058.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of clinical and experimental immunology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of clinical and experimental immunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:卡马西平是治疗局灶性癫痫的一线药物:卡马西平是治疗局灶性癫痫的一线药物。Tegretol 和 Tegatard 是卡马西平的两个商品名。替格瑞洛由瑞士诺华制药公司生产。最近,伊朗 Raha 制药公司生产了 CBZ,商品名为 Tegatard。扩大泰格列特的使用范围,取代泰格列特,可为伊朗家庭带来经济效益。在这项临床试验中,我们旨在比较替格瑞托和替格达对伴有或不伴有继发性全身泛化的局灶性癫痫发作患者的疗效和安全性。方法:我们筛选了 200 名伴有或不伴有继发性全身泛化的诱发或非诱发局灶性癫痫发作患者,其中 180 名患者符合双盲临床试验研究的标准。患者被分为两组,第一组(A)接受替格瑞洛治疗,第二组(B)接受替加特治疗。卡马西平(CBZ)由神经科医生处方,剂量为每 12 小时 10-20 毫克/千克。1个月、3个月和6个月后对患者进行回访,调查患者的副作用和实验室数据:患者分为两组,A 组(替格瑞洛)88 人(男性 50 人,女性 38 人),B 组(替加特)92 人(男性 51 人,女性 41 人)。患者的平均年龄为(35.39±11.17)岁。两组患者在年龄、性别、卡马西平用量、脑电图记录、神经影像学变化和抗癫痫药物不良反应等方面无明显差异(P>0.05)。在药物疗效方面,A 组和 B 组分别有 60 名(68%)和 58 名(63%)患者在随访 6 个月后癫痫不再发作。两组之间的差异无统计学意义(P 值 =0.46):结论:与替格瑞托相比,替加达是一种疗效、副作用和成本效益相似的有效药物,可在必要时广泛使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of the efficacy of Tegatard and Tegretol as a monotherapy in patients with focal seizure with or without secondary generalization.

Background: Carbamazepine is a first line treatment for focal epilepsy. Tegretol and Tegatard are two trade name of Carbamazepine. Tegretol is produced by Novartis Pharmaceutical Company, Switzerland. Recently, Raha pharmaceutical Company in Iran has produced CBZ which trade named is Tegatard. Extended usage of Tegatard instead of Tegretol has economic benefits for Iranian families. In this clinical trial, we aimed to compare therapeutic efficacy and safety of Tegretol and Tegatard in patients suffering from focal seizures with or without secondary generalization.

Methods: 200 patients with provoked or non-provoked focal seizure with or without secondary generalization were screened and 180 patients were fulfilled the criteria to enter this double blinded clinical trial study. Patients were divided into two groups, the first group (A) received Tegretol and the second group (B) Tegatard. Carbamazepine (CBZ) was prescribed with doses 10-20 mg/kg every 12 hours by neurologists. The patients were visited after 1, 3 and 6 months and the side effects and lab data in patients were investigated.

Results: Patients were divided into two groups, 88 patients in group A (Tegretol) (50 males and 38 females) and 92 in group B (Tegatard) (51 males and 41 females). Mean age of patients was 35.39±11.17 years. There was no significant difference according to age and gender, Carbamazepine dosage, EEG recording, neuroimaging change and adverse effects of antiepileptic drug between two groups (P>0.05). Regarding the drug efficacy, in group A and B, 60 (68%) and 58 (63%) patients were seizure free after 6 month follow up; respectively. The differences between two groups were not statistically significant (P value =0.46).

Conclusion: Tegatard is an effective drug with similar efficacy, similar side effects and cost-effectiveness compared with Tegretol and could be used widely when indicated.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Advance in the mechanism and clinical research of myalgia in long COVID. Characterization of tumor suppressors and oncogenes evaluated from TCGA cancers. Clinical utility of multi-row spiral CT in diagnosing hepatic nodular lesions, gastric cancer, and Crohn's disease: a comprehensive meta-analysis. Effectiveness study of surface electromyography combined with spine 3D data system to evaluate scoliosis. The relationship between metabolites and gout: a Mendelian randomization study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1