日本年轻人唾液生物标志物与肠道微生物模式的差异

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q2 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Bioscience of Microbiota, Food and Health Pub Date : 2020-01-01 Epub Date: 2020-08-01 DOI:10.12938/bmfh.2019-034
Takahiro Seura, Tsutomu Fukuwatari
{"title":"日本年轻人唾液生物标志物与肠道微生物模式的差异","authors":"Takahiro Seura,&nbsp;Tsutomu Fukuwatari","doi":"10.12938/bmfh.2019-034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent evidence suggests that psychological stress is associated with gut microbiota; however, there are no reports of its association with gut microbial structure. This cross-sectional study examined the relationship between psychological stress and gut microbial patterns in young Japanese adults. Analysis of fecal microbiota was performed using terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP). Psychological stress was assessed using salivary biomarkers, including cortisol, alpha-amylase, and secretory IgA (S-IgA). Fecal microbial patterns were defined using principal component analysis of the T-RFLP profile and were classified into two enterotype-like clusters, which were defined by the B (microbiota dominated by <i>Bacteroides</i>) and BL patterns (microbiota dominated by <i>Bifidobacterium</i> and <i>Lactobacillales</i>), respectively. The Simpson index was significantly higher for the BL pattern than for the B pattern. The salivary cortisol level was significantly lower for the BL pattern than for the B pattern. Salivary alpha-amylase and S-IgA levels showed a negative correlation with the Simpson index. Our results raise the possibility that salivary biomarkers may be involved in the observed differences in microbial patterns.</p>","PeriodicalId":8867,"journal":{"name":"Bioscience of Microbiota, Food and Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7573114/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences in gut microbial patterns associated with salivary biomarkers in young Japanese adults.\",\"authors\":\"Takahiro Seura,&nbsp;Tsutomu Fukuwatari\",\"doi\":\"10.12938/bmfh.2019-034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Recent evidence suggests that psychological stress is associated with gut microbiota; however, there are no reports of its association with gut microbial structure. This cross-sectional study examined the relationship between psychological stress and gut microbial patterns in young Japanese adults. Analysis of fecal microbiota was performed using terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP). Psychological stress was assessed using salivary biomarkers, including cortisol, alpha-amylase, and secretory IgA (S-IgA). Fecal microbial patterns were defined using principal component analysis of the T-RFLP profile and were classified into two enterotype-like clusters, which were defined by the B (microbiota dominated by <i>Bacteroides</i>) and BL patterns (microbiota dominated by <i>Bifidobacterium</i> and <i>Lactobacillales</i>), respectively. The Simpson index was significantly higher for the BL pattern than for the B pattern. The salivary cortisol level was significantly lower for the BL pattern than for the B pattern. Salivary alpha-amylase and S-IgA levels showed a negative correlation with the Simpson index. Our results raise the possibility that salivary biomarkers may be involved in the observed differences in microbial patterns.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8867,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bioscience of Microbiota, Food and Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7573114/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bioscience of Microbiota, Food and Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12938/bmfh.2019-034\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/8/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioscience of Microbiota, Food and Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12938/bmfh.2019-034","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

最近的证据表明,心理压力与肠道微生物群有关;然而,没有关于其与肠道微生物结构相关的报道。这项横断面研究调查了日本年轻人心理压力和肠道微生物模式之间的关系。采用末端限制性片段长度多态性(T-RFLP)对粪便微生物群进行分析。使用唾液生物标志物评估心理压力,包括皮质醇、α -淀粉酶和分泌IgA (S-IgA)。利用T-RFLP谱的主成分分析确定了粪便微生物模式,并将其分为两个肠型样集群,分别由B(以拟杆菌为主的微生物群)和BL(以双歧杆菌和乳酸杆菌为主的微生物群)定义。BL型的Simpson指数明显高于B型。唾液皮质醇水平在BL型组明显低于B型组。唾液α -淀粉酶和S-IgA水平与辛普森指数呈负相关。我们的研究结果提出了唾液生物标志物可能参与观察到的微生物模式差异的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Differences in gut microbial patterns associated with salivary biomarkers in young Japanese adults.

Recent evidence suggests that psychological stress is associated with gut microbiota; however, there are no reports of its association with gut microbial structure. This cross-sectional study examined the relationship between psychological stress and gut microbial patterns in young Japanese adults. Analysis of fecal microbiota was performed using terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP). Psychological stress was assessed using salivary biomarkers, including cortisol, alpha-amylase, and secretory IgA (S-IgA). Fecal microbial patterns were defined using principal component analysis of the T-RFLP profile and were classified into two enterotype-like clusters, which were defined by the B (microbiota dominated by Bacteroides) and BL patterns (microbiota dominated by Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillales), respectively. The Simpson index was significantly higher for the BL pattern than for the B pattern. The salivary cortisol level was significantly lower for the BL pattern than for the B pattern. Salivary alpha-amylase and S-IgA levels showed a negative correlation with the Simpson index. Our results raise the possibility that salivary biomarkers may be involved in the observed differences in microbial patterns.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bioscience of Microbiota, Food and Health
Bioscience of Microbiota, Food and Health Immunology and Microbiology-Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
3.20%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Bioscience of Microbiota, Food and Health (BMFH) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal with a specific area of focus: intestinal microbiota of human and animals, lactic acid bacteria (LAB) and food immunology and food function. BMFH contains Full papers, Notes, Reviews and Letters to the editor in all areas dealing with intestinal microbiota, LAB and food immunology and food function. BMFH takes a multidisciplinary approach and focuses on a broad spectrum of issues.
期刊最新文献
Effect of magnesium oxide with probiotics on bowel movements in elderly orthopedic patients with chronic constipation: a retrospective chart review. Microbial composition and metabolic profiles during machine-controlled intra-factory fermentation of cocoa beans harvested in semitropical area of Japan. Effects of blackcurrant extract on indole and ammonia productions in an in vitro human fecal culture model. Lactiplantibacillus plantarum 06CC2 upregulates intestinal ZO-1 protein and bile acid metabolism in Balb/c mice fed high-fat diet. Antimicrobial resistance in food-associated Escherichia coli in Mexico and Latin America.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1