德国18-65岁健康成人体重和最大压力分布的标准参考值

IF 3.1 4区医学 Q1 Social Sciences Journal of Physiological Anthropology Pub Date : 2020-11-30 DOI:10.1186/s40101-020-00246-6

D Ohlendorf, K Kerth, W Osiander, F Holzgreve, L Fraeulin, H Ackermann, D A Groneberg

{"title":"德国18-65岁健康成人体重和最大压力分布的标准参考值","authors":"D Ohlendorf, K Kerth, W Osiander, F Holzgreve, L Fraeulin, H Ackermann, D A Groneberg","doi":"10.1186/s40101-020-00246-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The aim of this study was to collect standard reference values of the weight and the maximum pressure distribution in healthy adults aged 18-65 years and to investigate the influence of constitutional parameters on it.Methods: A total of 416 healthy subjects (208 male / 208 female) aged between 18 and 65 years (Ø 38.3 ± 14.1 years) participated in this study, conducted 2015-2019 in Heidelberg. The age-specific evaluation is based on 4 age groups (G1, 18-30 years; G2, 31-40 years; G3, 41-50 years; G4, 51-65 years). A pressure measuring plate FDM-S (Zebris/Isny/Germany) was used to collect body weight distribution and maximum pressure distribution of the right and left foot and left and right forefoot/rearfoot, respectively.Results: Body weight distribution of the left (50.07%) and right (50.12%) foot was balanced. There was higher load on the rearfoot (left 54.14%; right 55.09%) than on the forefoot (left 45.49%; right 44.26%). The pressure in the rearfoot was higher than in the forefoot (rearfoot left 9.60 N/cm2, rearfoot right 9.51 N/cm2/forefoot left 8.23 N/cm2, forefoot right 8.59 N/cm2). With increasing age, the load in the left foot shifted from the rearfoot to the forefoot as well as the maximum pressure (p ≤ 0.02 and 0.03; poor effect size). With increasing BMI, the body weight shifted to the left and right rearfoot (p ≤ 0.001, poor effect size). As BMI increased, so did the maximum pressure in all areas (p ≤ 0.001 and 0.03, weak to moderate effect size). There were significant differences in weight and maximum pressure distribution in the forefoot and rearfoot in the different age groups, especially between younger (18-40 years) and older (41-65 years) subjects.Discussion: Healthy individuals aged from 18 to 65 years were found to have a balanced weight distribution in an aspect ratio, with a 20% greater load of the rearfoot. Age and BMI were found to be influencing factors of the weight and maximum pressure distribution, especially between younger and elder subjects. The collected standard reference values allow comparisons with other studies and can serve as a guideline in clinical practice and scientific studies.","PeriodicalId":16768,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physiological Anthropology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40101-020-00246-6","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Standard reference values of weight and maximum pressure distribution in healthy adults aged 18-65 years in Germany.\",\"authors\":\"D Ohlendorf, K Kerth, W Osiander, F Holzgreve, L Fraeulin, H Ackermann, D A Groneberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40101-020-00246-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The aim of this study was to collect standard reference values of the weight and the maximum pressure distribution in healthy adults aged 18-65 years and to investigate the influence of constitutional parameters on it.Methods: A total of 416 healthy subjects (208 male / 208 female) aged between 18 and 65 years (Ø 38.3 ± 14.1 years) participated in this study, conducted 2015-2019 in Heidelberg. The age-specific evaluation is based on 4 age groups (G1, 18-30 years; G2, 31-40 years; G3, 41-50 years; G4, 51-65 years). A pressure measuring plate FDM-S (Zebris/Isny/Germany) was used to collect body weight distribution and maximum pressure distribution of the right and left foot and left and right forefoot/rearfoot, respectively.Results: Body weight distribution of the left (50.07%) and right (50.12%) foot was balanced. There was higher load on the rearfoot (left 54.14%; right 55.09%) than on the forefoot (left 45.49%; right 44.26%). The pressure in the rearfoot was higher than in the forefoot (rearfoot left 9.60 N/cm2, rearfoot right 9.51 N/cm2/forefoot left 8.23 N/cm2, forefoot right 8.59 N/cm2). With increasing age, the load in the left foot shifted from the rearfoot to the forefoot as well as the maximum pressure (p ≤ 0.02 and 0.03; poor effect size). With increasing BMI, the body weight shifted to the left and right rearfoot (p ≤ 0.001, poor effect size). As BMI increased, so did the maximum pressure in all areas (p ≤ 0.001 and 0.03, weak to moderate effect size). There were significant differences in weight and maximum pressure distribution in the forefoot and rearfoot in the different age groups, especially between younger (18-40 years) and older (41-65 years) subjects.Discussion: Healthy individuals aged from 18 to 65 years were found to have a balanced weight distribution in an aspect ratio, with a 20% greater load of the rearfoot. Age and BMI were found to be influencing factors of the weight and maximum pressure distribution, especially between younger and elder subjects. The collected standard reference values allow comparisons with other studies and can serve as a guideline in clinical practice and scientific studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16768,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Physiological Anthropology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40101-020-00246-6\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Physiological Anthropology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40101-020-00246-6\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physiological Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40101-020-00246-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 12

摘要

背景:本研究旨在收集18-65岁健康成人体重和最大压力分布的标准参考值，并探讨体质参数对其的影响。方法:2015-2019年在海德堡市进行，共416名健康受试者(男208名，女208名)，年龄在18 ~ 65岁(Ø 38.3±14.1岁)。具体年龄评估基于4个年龄组(G1, 18-30岁;G2, 31-40岁;G3, 41-50岁;G4, 51-65年)。采用FDM-S型压力测量板(Zebris/Isny/德国)分别采集小鼠左右足体重分布和左右前脚/后脚最大压力分布。结果:左足(50.07%)、右足(50.12%)体重分布平衡。后脚负重较高(左54.14%;右脚55.09%)比前脚(左脚45.49%;正确的44.26%)。后脚压力高于前脚(左后脚9.60 N/cm2，右后脚9.51 N/cm2，左前脚8.23 N/cm2，右前脚8.59 N/cm2)。随着年龄的增长，左脚的载荷由后脚向前脚转移，最大压力(p≤0.02和0.03;效果差)。随着BMI的增加，体重向左右后脚偏移(p≤0.001，效应量较差)。随着BMI的增加，各区域的最大压力也随之增加(p≤0.001和0.03，弱到中等效应量)。在不同年龄组中，前、后足体重和最大压力分布存在显著差异，特别是在年轻(18-40岁)和老年(41-65岁)受试者之间。讨论:18至65岁的健康个体在纵横比中体重分布平衡，后脚负荷增加20%。年龄和BMI是影响体重和最大压力分布的因素，尤其是在年轻人和老年人之间。收集到的标准参考值可与其他研究进行比较，并可作为临床实践和科学研究的指导。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Standard reference values of weight and maximum pressure distribution in healthy adults aged 18-65 years in Germany.

Background: The aim of this study was to collect standard reference values of the weight and the maximum pressure distribution in healthy adults aged 18-65 years and to investigate the influence of constitutional parameters on it.

Methods: A total of 416 healthy subjects (208 male / 208 female) aged between 18 and 65 years (Ø 38.3 ± 14.1 years) participated in this study, conducted 2015-2019 in Heidelberg. The age-specific evaluation is based on 4 age groups (G1, 18-30 years; G2, 31-40 years; G3, 41-50 years; G4, 51-65 years). A pressure measuring plate FDM-S (Zebris/Isny/Germany) was used to collect body weight distribution and maximum pressure distribution of the right and left foot and left and right forefoot/rearfoot, respectively.

Results: Body weight distribution of the left (50.07%) and right (50.12%) foot was balanced. There was higher load on the rearfoot (left 54.14%; right 55.09%) than on the forefoot (left 45.49%; right 44.26%). The pressure in the rearfoot was higher than in the forefoot (rearfoot left 9.60 N/cm², rearfoot right 9.51 N/cm²/forefoot left 8.23 N/cm², forefoot right 8.59 N/cm²). With increasing age, the load in the left foot shifted from the rearfoot to the forefoot as well as the maximum pressure (p ≤ 0.02 and 0.03; poor effect size). With increasing BMI, the body weight shifted to the left and right rearfoot (p ≤ 0.001, poor effect size). As BMI increased, so did the maximum pressure in all areas (p ≤ 0.001 and 0.03, weak to moderate effect size). There were significant differences in weight and maximum pressure distribution in the forefoot and rearfoot in the different age groups, especially between younger (18-40 years) and older (41-65 years) subjects.

Discussion: Healthy individuals aged from 18 to 65 years were found to have a balanced weight distribution in an aspect ratio, with a 20% greater load of the rearfoot. Age and BMI were found to be influencing factors of the weight and maximum pressure distribution, especially between younger and elder subjects. The collected standard reference values allow comparisons with other studies and can serve as a guideline in clinical practice and scientific studies.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Physiological Anthropology Social Sciences-Human Factors and Ergonomics

CiteScore

4.80

自引率

6.50%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： Journal of Physiological Anthropology (JPA) is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that publishes research on the physiological functions of modern mankind, with an emphasis on the physical and bio-cultural effects on human adaptability to the current environment. The objective of JPA is to evaluate physiological adaptations to modern living environments, and to publish research from different scientific fields concerned with environmental impact on human life. Topic areas include, but are not limited to: environmental physiology bio-cultural environment living environment epigenetic adaptation development and growth age and sex differences nutrition and morphology physical fitness and health Journal of Physiological Anthropology is the official journal of the Japan Society of Physiological Anthropology.