我们能提高大众的主观幸福感吗?对证据的全面审查

IF 5.2 3区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Revista de psiquiatria y salud mental Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.rpsm.2020.08.002
Aleix Solanes , Anton Albajes-Eizagirre , Miquel A. Fullana , Lydia Fortea , Paolo Fusar-Poli , Carla Torrent , Brisa Solé , Caterina Mar Bonnín , Jae Il Shin , Eduard Vieta , Joaquim Radua
{"title":"我们能提高大众的主观幸福感吗?对证据的全面审查","authors":"Aleix Solanes ,&nbsp;Anton Albajes-Eizagirre ,&nbsp;Miquel A. Fullana ,&nbsp;Lydia Fortea ,&nbsp;Paolo Fusar-Poli ,&nbsp;Carla Torrent ,&nbsp;Brisa Solé ,&nbsp;Caterina Mar Bonnín ,&nbsp;Jae Il Shin ,&nbsp;Eduard Vieta ,&nbsp;Joaquim Radua","doi":"10.1016/j.rpsm.2020.08.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Subjective well-being (SWB) refers to being satisfied with one's life, having positive affect and having little negative affect. We may understand it as a subjective definition of good life, or in colloquial terms “happiness”, and it has been associated with several important benefits such as lower mortality. In the last decades, several randomized controlled trials (RCT) have investigated the efficacy of several interventions in increasing SWB in the general population but results from different disciplines have not been integrated.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of RCT that assess the efficacy of any kind of interventions in increasing SWB in the general population, including both positive psychology interventions (PPI) and other interventions. We (re)calculated the meta-analytic statistics needed to objectively assess the quality of the evidence of the efficacy of each type of intervention in improving each component of SWB according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There was moderate-quality evidence that PPI might induce small decreases of negative affect, and low-quality evidence that they might induce moderate increases of positive affect. We found similar results for those PPI specifically consisting in conducting acts of kindness (especially spending money on or giving items to others), for which there was low-quality evidence that they might induces small increases of life satisfaction, but not for PPI specifically consisting in practicing gratitude. Quality of the evidence of the efficacy for the other interventions included in the umbrella review (yoga, resilience training, physical activity, leisure, control enhancement, psychoeducation, and miscellaneous) was very low.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>There is some evidence that PPI, and specially conducting acts of kindness such as spending money on others, may increase the SWB of the general population. The quality of the evidence of the efficacy for other interventions (e.g., yoga, physical activity, or leisure) is still very low.</p><p><strong>Registration number</strong>: PROSPERO CRD42020111681.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21391,"journal":{"name":"Revista de psiquiatria y salud mental","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888989120301014/pdfft?md5=73e8bccba87c51335d3cc7a5231a2d8f&pid=1-s2.0-S1888989120301014-main.pdf","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can we increase the subjective well-being of the general population? An umbrella review of the evidence\",\"authors\":\"Aleix Solanes ,&nbsp;Anton Albajes-Eizagirre ,&nbsp;Miquel A. Fullana ,&nbsp;Lydia Fortea ,&nbsp;Paolo Fusar-Poli ,&nbsp;Carla Torrent ,&nbsp;Brisa Solé ,&nbsp;Caterina Mar Bonnín ,&nbsp;Jae Il Shin ,&nbsp;Eduard Vieta ,&nbsp;Joaquim Radua\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rpsm.2020.08.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Subjective well-being (SWB) refers to being satisfied with one's life, having positive affect and having little negative affect. We may understand it as a subjective definition of good life, or in colloquial terms “happiness”, and it has been associated with several important benefits such as lower mortality. In the last decades, several randomized controlled trials (RCT) have investigated the efficacy of several interventions in increasing SWB in the general population but results from different disciplines have not been integrated.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of RCT that assess the efficacy of any kind of interventions in increasing SWB in the general population, including both positive psychology interventions (PPI) and other interventions. We (re)calculated the meta-analytic statistics needed to objectively assess the quality of the evidence of the efficacy of each type of intervention in improving each component of SWB according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There was moderate-quality evidence that PPI might induce small decreases of negative affect, and low-quality evidence that they might induce moderate increases of positive affect. We found similar results for those PPI specifically consisting in conducting acts of kindness (especially spending money on or giving items to others), for which there was low-quality evidence that they might induces small increases of life satisfaction, but not for PPI specifically consisting in practicing gratitude. Quality of the evidence of the efficacy for the other interventions included in the umbrella review (yoga, resilience training, physical activity, leisure, control enhancement, psychoeducation, and miscellaneous) was very low.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>There is some evidence that PPI, and specially conducting acts of kindness such as spending money on others, may increase the SWB of the general population. The quality of the evidence of the efficacy for other interventions (e.g., yoga, physical activity, or leisure) is still very low.</p><p><strong>Registration number</strong>: PROSPERO CRD42020111681.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21391,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de psiquiatria y salud mental\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888989120301014/pdfft?md5=73e8bccba87c51335d3cc7a5231a2d8f&pid=1-s2.0-S1888989120301014-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de psiquiatria y salud mental\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888989120301014\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de psiquiatria y salud mental","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888989120301014","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

主观幸福感(subjective well-being, SWB)是指对自己的生活感到满意,有积极的影响,很少有消极的影响。我们可以把它理解为对美好生活的主观定义,或者通俗地说就是“幸福”,它与一些重要的好处有关,比如降低死亡率。在过去的几十年里,一些随机对照试验(RCT)研究了几种干预措施对增加一般人群主观幸福感的效果,但来自不同学科的结果尚未得到整合。方法:我们对随机对照试验进行了系统综述和荟萃分析,以评估任何干预措施在增加普通人群主观幸福感方面的效果,包括积极心理学干预(PPI)和其他干预措施。我们(重新)计算了meta分析统计数据,以客观评估每种干预措施在改善主观幸福感各组成部分方面的有效性的证据质量,这些证据质量是根据建议评估、发展和评估分级(GRADE)方法得出的。结果有中等质量的证据表明,PPI可能会导致消极情绪的小幅下降,而低质量的证据表明,PPI可能会导致积极情绪的适度增加。我们发现,对于那些具体包括进行善意行为(特别是花钱或给别人物品)的PPI,也有类似的结果,因为有低质量的证据表明,它们可能会导致生活满意度的小幅增加,但对于那些具体包括练习感恩的PPI,则没有类似的结果。总括性回顾中包括的其他干预措施(瑜伽、恢复力训练、体育活动、休闲、控制增强、心理教育和其他)的有效性证据质量非常低。结论有证据表明,个人幸福感,尤其是为他人花钱等善意行为,可能会增加一般人群的幸福感。其他干预措施(如瑜伽、体育活动或休闲)有效性的证据质量仍然很低。注册号:PROSPERO CRD42020111681。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Can we increase the subjective well-being of the general population? An umbrella review of the evidence

Introduction

Subjective well-being (SWB) refers to being satisfied with one's life, having positive affect and having little negative affect. We may understand it as a subjective definition of good life, or in colloquial terms “happiness”, and it has been associated with several important benefits such as lower mortality. In the last decades, several randomized controlled trials (RCT) have investigated the efficacy of several interventions in increasing SWB in the general population but results from different disciplines have not been integrated.

Methods

We conducted an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of RCT that assess the efficacy of any kind of interventions in increasing SWB in the general population, including both positive psychology interventions (PPI) and other interventions. We (re)calculated the meta-analytic statistics needed to objectively assess the quality of the evidence of the efficacy of each type of intervention in improving each component of SWB according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

Results

There was moderate-quality evidence that PPI might induce small decreases of negative affect, and low-quality evidence that they might induce moderate increases of positive affect. We found similar results for those PPI specifically consisting in conducting acts of kindness (especially spending money on or giving items to others), for which there was low-quality evidence that they might induces small increases of life satisfaction, but not for PPI specifically consisting in practicing gratitude. Quality of the evidence of the efficacy for the other interventions included in the umbrella review (yoga, resilience training, physical activity, leisure, control enhancement, psychoeducation, and miscellaneous) was very low.

Conclusion

There is some evidence that PPI, and specially conducting acts of kindness such as spending money on others, may increase the SWB of the general population. The quality of the evidence of the efficacy for other interventions (e.g., yoga, physical activity, or leisure) is still very low.

Registration number: PROSPERO CRD42020111681.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
3.30%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: The Spanish Journal of Psychiatry and Mental Health (SJPMH), incorporated into ISSN 1888-9891, is the official scientific publication of the Spanish Society of Psychiatry and Mental Health. The journal focuses on studying mental illnesses, their pathological processes, and their psychosocial consequences, and aims to disseminate scientific advances in all areas related to mental health and illness. SJPMH accepts unpublished works on psychiatry and mental health, including their medical and social implications. The journal provides space for research in the biological, clinical, and psychosocial fields. Manuscripts undergo peer-review by external reviewers before being accepted for publication. SJPMH is indexed in Index Medicus/Medline, IBECS, Social Sciences Citation Index Journal Citation Reports/Social Sciences Edition, and Current Contents/Social and Behavioral Sciences.
期刊最新文献
Schizophrenia and the COVID-19 pandemic: A narrative review from the biomedical perspective. Volume alterations of the hippocampus and amygdala in patients with schizophrenia and persistent auditory hallucinations. Deep brain stimulation and digital monitoring for patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: A case series. Koro-like syndrome in Huntington's disease. Meta-analysis of the effects of adjuvant drugs in co-occurring bipolar and substance use disorder.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1