在普通人群和STEM教师中隐含的性别科学关联。

IF 1.9 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of General Psychology Pub Date : 2022-07-01 Epub Date: 2020-12-07 DOI:10.1080/00221309.2020.1853502
Maddalena Marini, Mahzarin R Banaji
{"title":"在普通人群和STEM教师中隐含的性别科学关联。","authors":"Maddalena Marini,&nbsp;Mahzarin R Banaji","doi":"10.1080/00221309.2020.1853502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We investigated implicit associations between social categories <i>female</i> or <i>male</i> and the attributes <i>sex</i> or <i>science</i>. In six experiments, Implicit Association Tests (IATs) showed <i>female + sex/male + science</i> associations. The bias was observed (a) in both men and women; (b) in participants who reported sexual attraction to both females and males (greater for the former); (c) in members of the general population as well as among STEM faculty from the highest ranked U.S. STEM universities; (d) even when both gender categories were clearly presented as scientists, via photos and words, (e) using both the standard IAT and a single category variation; and (f) hardly at all on explicit measures in contrast to implicit measures. By introducing the attribute of sexuality, these studies bring to light a robust if unintended mental association of women as sexual beings. The automaticity and surprising generality of the effect suggests that this association may be an unintentional yet potent barrier to women's lower representation and success in STEM.</p>","PeriodicalId":47581,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00221309.2020.1853502","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An implicit gender sex-science association in the general population and STEM faculty.\",\"authors\":\"Maddalena Marini,&nbsp;Mahzarin R Banaji\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00221309.2020.1853502\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We investigated implicit associations between social categories <i>female</i> or <i>male</i> and the attributes <i>sex</i> or <i>science</i>. In six experiments, Implicit Association Tests (IATs) showed <i>female + sex/male + science</i> associations. The bias was observed (a) in both men and women; (b) in participants who reported sexual attraction to both females and males (greater for the former); (c) in members of the general population as well as among STEM faculty from the highest ranked U.S. STEM universities; (d) even when both gender categories were clearly presented as scientists, via photos and words, (e) using both the standard IAT and a single category variation; and (f) hardly at all on explicit measures in contrast to implicit measures. By introducing the attribute of sexuality, these studies bring to light a robust if unintended mental association of women as sexual beings. The automaticity and surprising generality of the effect suggests that this association may be an unintentional yet potent barrier to women's lower representation and success in STEM.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47581,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of General Psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00221309.2020.1853502\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of General Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.2020.1853502\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/12/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.2020.1853502","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/12/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

我们调查了社会类别女性或男性与属性性别或科学之间的内隐联系。在6个实验中,内隐联想测验(IATs)显示女性+性别/男性+科学联想。在男性和女性中都观察到偏差(a);(b)同时被女性和男性吸引的参与者(前者更有吸引力);(c)普通民众以及来自美国排名最高的STEM大学的STEM教师;(d)即使两种性别类别都通过照片和文字清楚地呈现为科学家,(e)同时使用标准IAT和单一类别变体;(f)与隐性措施相比,几乎没有明确的措施。通过引入性的属性,这些研究揭示了女性作为性生物的一种强有力的、尽管并非有意的心理联系。这种效应的自动性和令人惊讶的普遍性表明,这种关联可能是女性在STEM中较低代表性和成功的一个无意但有力的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An implicit gender sex-science association in the general population and STEM faculty.

We investigated implicit associations between social categories female or male and the attributes sex or science. In six experiments, Implicit Association Tests (IATs) showed female + sex/male + science associations. The bias was observed (a) in both men and women; (b) in participants who reported sexual attraction to both females and males (greater for the former); (c) in members of the general population as well as among STEM faculty from the highest ranked U.S. STEM universities; (d) even when both gender categories were clearly presented as scientists, via photos and words, (e) using both the standard IAT and a single category variation; and (f) hardly at all on explicit measures in contrast to implicit measures. By introducing the attribute of sexuality, these studies bring to light a robust if unintended mental association of women as sexual beings. The automaticity and surprising generality of the effect suggests that this association may be an unintentional yet potent barrier to women's lower representation and success in STEM.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of General Psychology
Journal of General Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: The Journal of General Psychology publishes human and animal research reflecting various methodological approaches in all areas of experimental psychology. It covers traditional topics such as physiological and comparative psychology, sensation, perception, learning, and motivation, as well as more diverse topics such as cognition, memory, language, aging, and substance abuse, or mathematical, statistical, methodological, and other theoretical investigations. The journal especially features studies that establish functional relationships, involve a series of integrated experiments, or contribute to the development of new theoretical insights or practical applications.
期刊最新文献
Self-focused autonomy, other-focused pro-sociality, and well-being: a cross-national cluster analysis. Age differences in the recruitment of syntactic analysis and semantic plausibility during sentence comprehension. Don't worry, they get the idea: instructions have no impact on dehumanization ratings on the Ascent of Human Scale. Causality orientations and spontaneous mental contrasting. Roles of expressed gratitude and apologies in predicting reciprocal responsiveness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1