“职业性久坐会致死;但谁在乎呢?:对印度白领久坐行为的障碍和促进因素的定量分析。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Archives of Environmental & Occupational Health Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2020-12-11 DOI:10.1080/19338244.2020.1853018
Alfiya Shaikh, Sidhiprada Mohapatra, Baskaran Chandrasekaran
{"title":"“职业性久坐会致死;但谁在乎呢?:对印度白领久坐行为的障碍和促进因素的定量分析。","authors":"Alfiya Shaikh,&nbsp;Sidhiprada Mohapatra,&nbsp;Baskaran Chandrasekaran","doi":"10.1080/19338244.2020.1853018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The knowledge, attitude and practices of employees and employers toward reducing sedentary behavior (SB) and improving physical activity (PA) at Indian workplaces remain unclear. A bespoke questionnaire assessing barriers and facilitators of occupational SB and PA practices as informed by the theoretical framework and behavioral change wheel model was adapted. Two hundred and three white-collar workers (both employees and managers) from eight corporate sectors were inquired about the SB, and PA practices at workplaces. The dichotomous variables of barriers and facilitators were analyzed by nonparametric tests. Excessive sitters had good knowledge (>75%), good attitude (>85%) but poor workplace SB and PA practice (>90%). Workplace SB, or PA practices differed between employers and employees. Low practice of workplace PA or SB interventions may be due to lack of workplace policies for SB interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":8173,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Environmental & Occupational Health","volume":"77 2","pages":"96-108"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19338244.2020.1853018","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"Occupational sitting kills; but who cares?\\\": Quantitative analysis of barriers and facilitators of sedentary behavior in Indian white-collar workers.\",\"authors\":\"Alfiya Shaikh,&nbsp;Sidhiprada Mohapatra,&nbsp;Baskaran Chandrasekaran\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19338244.2020.1853018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The knowledge, attitude and practices of employees and employers toward reducing sedentary behavior (SB) and improving physical activity (PA) at Indian workplaces remain unclear. A bespoke questionnaire assessing barriers and facilitators of occupational SB and PA practices as informed by the theoretical framework and behavioral change wheel model was adapted. Two hundred and three white-collar workers (both employees and managers) from eight corporate sectors were inquired about the SB, and PA practices at workplaces. The dichotomous variables of barriers and facilitators were analyzed by nonparametric tests. Excessive sitters had good knowledge (>75%), good attitude (>85%) but poor workplace SB and PA practice (>90%). Workplace SB, or PA practices differed between employers and employees. Low practice of workplace PA or SB interventions may be due to lack of workplace policies for SB interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8173,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Environmental & Occupational Health\",\"volume\":\"77 2\",\"pages\":\"96-108\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19338244.2020.1853018\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Environmental & Occupational Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19338244.2020.1853018\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/12/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Environmental & Occupational Health","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19338244.2020.1853018","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/12/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在印度的工作场所,员工和雇主对减少久坐行为(SB)和改善身体活动(PA)的知识、态度和做法尚不清楚。根据理论框架和行为改变轮模型,采用了一份评估职业SB和PA实践障碍和促进因素的定制问卷。来自8个企业部门的203名白领(包括员工和经理)被问及工作场所的SB和PA实践。通过非参数检验对障碍和促进因素的二分类变量进行了分析。过量的保姆有良好的知识(>75%),良好的态度(>85%),但较差的工作场所SB和PA实践(>90%)。工作场所SB或PA的做法在雇主和雇员之间有所不同。工作场所PA或SB干预的低实践可能是由于缺乏针对SB干预的工作场所政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"Occupational sitting kills; but who cares?": Quantitative analysis of barriers and facilitators of sedentary behavior in Indian white-collar workers.

The knowledge, attitude and practices of employees and employers toward reducing sedentary behavior (SB) and improving physical activity (PA) at Indian workplaces remain unclear. A bespoke questionnaire assessing barriers and facilitators of occupational SB and PA practices as informed by the theoretical framework and behavioral change wheel model was adapted. Two hundred and three white-collar workers (both employees and managers) from eight corporate sectors were inquired about the SB, and PA practices at workplaces. The dichotomous variables of barriers and facilitators were analyzed by nonparametric tests. Excessive sitters had good knowledge (>75%), good attitude (>85%) but poor workplace SB and PA practice (>90%). Workplace SB, or PA practices differed between employers and employees. Low practice of workplace PA or SB interventions may be due to lack of workplace policies for SB interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Environmental & Occupational Health
Archives of Environmental & Occupational Health 环境科学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Archives of Environmental & Occupational Health , originally founded in 1919 as the Journal of Industrial Hygiene, and perhaps most well-known as the Archives of Environmental Health, reports, integrates, and consolidates the latest research, both nationally and internationally, from fields germane to environmental health, including epidemiology, toxicology, exposure assessment, modeling and biostatistics, risk science and biochemistry. Publishing new research based on the most rigorous methods and discussion to put this work in perspective for public health, public policy, and sustainability, the Archives addresses such topics of current concern as health significance of chemical exposure, toxic waste, new and old energy technologies, industrial processes, and the environmental causation of disease such as neurotoxicity, birth defects, cancer, and chronic degenerative diseases. For more than 90 years, this noted journal has provided objective documentation of the effects of environmental agents on human and, in some cases, animal populations and information of practical importance on which decisions are based.
期刊最新文献
A study on the relationship between job-stress and burnout: Focusing on job domain among medical technologists in South Korea A prospective study of health-related lifestyle changes among police cadets. Occupational well-being in medical workers in Inner Mongolia after the Normalized Epidemic Prevention and Control Strategy: A cross-sectional study Prolonged cough and dyspnea following a single episode of intense silica exposure Heavy metal worker’s pneumonoconiosis with lung parenchymal damage and Peripheral neuropathy: case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1