支气管肺发育不良患者的呼吸多导图:一项回顾性研究。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Minerva pediatrica Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2020-12-11 DOI:10.23736/S2724-5276.20.06088-0
Carlo De Pieri, Brigitte Fauroux, Sonia Khirani, Briac Thierry, Christophe Delacourt, Paola Cogo, Alessandro Amaddeo
{"title":"支气管肺发育不良患者的呼吸多导图:一项回顾性研究。","authors":"Carlo De Pieri, Brigitte Fauroux, Sonia Khirani, Briac Thierry, Christophe Delacourt, Paola Cogo, Alessandro Amaddeo","doi":"10.23736/S2724-5276.20.06088-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Periodic assessment of the need for oxygen supplementation and/or mechanical ventilation in children with severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) is crucial. The aim of the study was to analyze the indications and results of respiratory polygraphies (RP) performed in preterm infants with BPD followed at a tertiary university hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All subjects <5-year-old with BPD who had a RP between September and February 2018 were included. The indications and results of RP and consequent medical management were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen infants (9 females, mean gestational age 27.6±3.3 weeks) underwent a RP at mean age of 26.4±19.4 months. Five subjects were evaluated for the need of long-term respiratory support (RS), 3 started continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), 2 were weaned from RS. Four subjects underwent RP for suspected obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), one started on CPAP. Central apnea syndrome (CSA) was confirmed in 2 subjects and one was started on non-invasive ventilation. RP allowed safe tracheostomy decannulation in 2 subjects. Finally, RP was normal in one subject who had a brief resolved unexplained event.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RP represents an important tool for the evaluation of children with BPD and leads to important therapeutic decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":18533,"journal":{"name":"Minerva pediatrica","volume":" ","pages":"350-356"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Respiratory polygraphy in children with bronchopulmonary dysplasia: a retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Carlo De Pieri, Brigitte Fauroux, Sonia Khirani, Briac Thierry, Christophe Delacourt, Paola Cogo, Alessandro Amaddeo\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S2724-5276.20.06088-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Periodic assessment of the need for oxygen supplementation and/or mechanical ventilation in children with severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) is crucial. The aim of the study was to analyze the indications and results of respiratory polygraphies (RP) performed in preterm infants with BPD followed at a tertiary university hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All subjects <5-year-old with BPD who had a RP between September and February 2018 were included. The indications and results of RP and consequent medical management were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen infants (9 females, mean gestational age 27.6±3.3 weeks) underwent a RP at mean age of 26.4±19.4 months. Five subjects were evaluated for the need of long-term respiratory support (RS), 3 started continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), 2 were weaned from RS. Four subjects underwent RP for suspected obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), one started on CPAP. Central apnea syndrome (CSA) was confirmed in 2 subjects and one was started on non-invasive ventilation. RP allowed safe tracheostomy decannulation in 2 subjects. Finally, RP was normal in one subject who had a brief resolved unexplained event.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RP represents an important tool for the evaluation of children with BPD and leads to important therapeutic decisions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minerva pediatrica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"350-356\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minerva pediatrica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-5276.20.06088-0\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/12/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva pediatrica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-5276.20.06088-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/12/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:定期评估严重支气管肺发育不良(BPD)患儿是否需要补充氧气和/或机械通气至关重要。本研究旨在分析一家三级大学医院对患有支气管肺发育不良的早产儿进行呼吸测谎(RP)的适应症和结果:纳入2018年9月至2月期间进行过RP的所有小于5岁的BPD受试者。分析了RP的适应症、结果以及随后的医疗管理:14名婴儿(9名女性,平均胎龄(27.6±3.3)周)在平均年龄(26.4±19.4)个月时接受了RP。5 名受试者接受了是否需要长期呼吸支持(RS)的评估,3 名开始使用持续气道正压(CPAP),2 名脱离了 RS。4 名受试者因疑似阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)接受了 RP 治疗,1 名开始使用 CPAP。两名受试者被证实患有中枢性呼吸暂停综合征(CSA),其中一人开始使用无创通气。2 名受试者通过 RP 安全解除了气管造口术。最后,一名发生短暂不明原因事件(BRUE)的患者的 RP 正常:RP是评估BPD患儿的重要工具,可帮助做出重要的治疗决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Respiratory polygraphy in children with bronchopulmonary dysplasia: a retrospective study.

Background: Periodic assessment of the need for oxygen supplementation and/or mechanical ventilation in children with severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) is crucial. The aim of the study was to analyze the indications and results of respiratory polygraphies (RP) performed in preterm infants with BPD followed at a tertiary university hospital.

Methods: All subjects <5-year-old with BPD who had a RP between September and February 2018 were included. The indications and results of RP and consequent medical management were analyzed.

Results: Fourteen infants (9 females, mean gestational age 27.6±3.3 weeks) underwent a RP at mean age of 26.4±19.4 months. Five subjects were evaluated for the need of long-term respiratory support (RS), 3 started continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), 2 were weaned from RS. Four subjects underwent RP for suspected obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), one started on CPAP. Central apnea syndrome (CSA) was confirmed in 2 subjects and one was started on non-invasive ventilation. RP allowed safe tracheostomy decannulation in 2 subjects. Finally, RP was normal in one subject who had a brief resolved unexplained event.

Conclusions: RP represents an important tool for the evaluation of children with BPD and leads to important therapeutic decisions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva pediatrica
Minerva pediatrica PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
3.80%
发文量
1
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Minerva Pediatrica publishes scientific papers on pediatrics, neonatology, adolescent medicine, child and adolescent psychiatry and pediatric surgery. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines. The journal aims to provide its readers with papers of the highest quality and impact through a process of careful peer review and editorial work.
期刊最新文献
A qualitative study of pediatric nurses' perception of factors affecting negotiation of care in a Pediatric Stem Cell Transplant Unit. The use of analgesics in pediatric patients with body injuries in pre-hospital conditions. Respiratory polygraphy in children with bronchopulmonary dysplasia: a retrospective study. Evaluation of factors affecting total nucleated cells in umbilical cord blood collected for the Calabria Cord Blood Bank. Risk factors associated with wheezing in severe pediatric community-acquired pneumonia: a retrospective study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1