早发性胎儿生长受限:诊断途径会影响结果和病理吗?

Brian Burnett, Linda Street, Kristen Quinn, Jeff M Denney
{"title":"早发性胎儿生长受限:诊断途径会影响结果和病理吗?","authors":"Brian Burnett,&nbsp;Linda Street,&nbsp;Kristen Quinn,&nbsp;Jeff M Denney","doi":"10.33696/gynaecology.1.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate demographics and outcomes of maternal-fetal pairs in early onset fetal growth restriction (FGR) requiring delivery prior to 34 weeks' gestation based on ultrasound indication leading to diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This is a descriptive study of maternal-fetal pairs with early FGR diagnosed prior to 30 weeks' gestation and delivering between 22w0d and 34w0d under the care of Wake Forest University Perinatology 01/2012-12/2016. Serial ultrasounds to assess fetal growth and umbilical artery flow Doppler velocimetry were evaluated. Pairs were dichotomized into those with maternal comorbidities leading to ultrasound diagnosis, and those with ultrasound indicated only by appreciation of uterine size less than dates on exam. Patient characteristics and outcomes were tracked. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed as appropriate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>56 pregnancies were identified with FGR prior to 30 weeks and subsequent delivery prior to 34 weeks. Common comorbidities present in the group with maternal comorbidities included chronic hypertension (30.5%), hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (36.1%), preexisting diabetes (13.9%), gestational diabetes (5.6%). None of the women in the S<D group developed hypertensive disorders of pregnancy or GDM. Other background characteristics were similar. Pregnancies evaluated for size less than dates were diagnosed on average 3 weeks later in gestation, had higher incidence of reverse end diastolic flow on Doppler evaluation both at diagnosis (80% vs. 22.9%, p=0.01, OR 0.08 (<0.01,0.74) and were more likely to be delivered for an urgent indication. Both groups of babies had similar survival to discharge rates and length of stay in the NICU. A subanalysis evaluating only babies with abnormal Doppler studies showed a shorter diagnosis to delivery interval and continued to show increased risk of urgent delivery due to fetal status in those pregnancies diagnosed based on size<dates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Women measuring size less than dates in the mid-trimester should be evaluated by ultrasound without delays. Early FGR carries a high mortality rate in all cases and in our pilot data, women measuring small were diagnosed later with fetal growth restriction and may represent a severe phenotype with poor fetal-placental circulation. These pregnancies often met criteria for urgent delivery in a short time frame, especially if abnormal umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry was noted.</p>","PeriodicalId":93076,"journal":{"name":"Archives of obstetrics and gynaecology","volume":"1 1","pages":"5-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7671592/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early Onset Fetal Growth Restriction: Does Path to Diagnosis Impact Outcomes and Pathology?\",\"authors\":\"Brian Burnett,&nbsp;Linda Street,&nbsp;Kristen Quinn,&nbsp;Jeff M Denney\",\"doi\":\"10.33696/gynaecology.1.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate demographics and outcomes of maternal-fetal pairs in early onset fetal growth restriction (FGR) requiring delivery prior to 34 weeks' gestation based on ultrasound indication leading to diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This is a descriptive study of maternal-fetal pairs with early FGR diagnosed prior to 30 weeks' gestation and delivering between 22w0d and 34w0d under the care of Wake Forest University Perinatology 01/2012-12/2016. Serial ultrasounds to assess fetal growth and umbilical artery flow Doppler velocimetry were evaluated. Pairs were dichotomized into those with maternal comorbidities leading to ultrasound diagnosis, and those with ultrasound indicated only by appreciation of uterine size less than dates on exam. Patient characteristics and outcomes were tracked. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed as appropriate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>56 pregnancies were identified with FGR prior to 30 weeks and subsequent delivery prior to 34 weeks. Common comorbidities present in the group with maternal comorbidities included chronic hypertension (30.5%), hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (36.1%), preexisting diabetes (13.9%), gestational diabetes (5.6%). None of the women in the S<D group developed hypertensive disorders of pregnancy or GDM. Other background characteristics were similar. Pregnancies evaluated for size less than dates were diagnosed on average 3 weeks later in gestation, had higher incidence of reverse end diastolic flow on Doppler evaluation both at diagnosis (80% vs. 22.9%, p=0.01, OR 0.08 (<0.01,0.74) and were more likely to be delivered for an urgent indication. Both groups of babies had similar survival to discharge rates and length of stay in the NICU. A subanalysis evaluating only babies with abnormal Doppler studies showed a shorter diagnosis to delivery interval and continued to show increased risk of urgent delivery due to fetal status in those pregnancies diagnosed based on size<dates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Women measuring size less than dates in the mid-trimester should be evaluated by ultrasound without delays. Early FGR carries a high mortality rate in all cases and in our pilot data, women measuring small were diagnosed later with fetal growth restriction and may represent a severe phenotype with poor fetal-placental circulation. These pregnancies often met criteria for urgent delivery in a short time frame, especially if abnormal umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry was noted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93076,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of obstetrics and gynaecology\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"5-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7671592/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of obstetrics and gynaecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33696/gynaecology.1.002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of obstetrics and gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33696/gynaecology.1.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:根据超声指征诊断,评估早发性胎儿生长受限(FGR)需要分娩的母胎对的人口统计学特征和结局。研究设计:本研究是一项描述性研究,研究对象是在妊娠30周前诊断为早期FGR的母胎,分娩时间在22 - 34天之间,于2012年1月- 2016年12月在维克森林大学围产医学中心进行。评估了一系列超声评估胎儿生长和脐动脉血流多普勒测速仪。这些患者被分为两组,一组有母体合并症,需要超声诊断,另一组只有超声显示子宫尺寸小于检查日期。跟踪患者的特征和结果。适当时进行单因素和多因素分析。结果:56例妊娠在30周前确诊为FGR,随后在34周前分娩。孕妇合并症组中常见的合并症包括慢性高血压(30.5%),妊娠期高血压疾病(36.1%),既往糖尿病(13.9%),妊娠期糖尿病(5.6%)。结论:在妊娠中期测量尺寸小于日期的妇女应立即用超声检查。在所有病例中,早期FGR的死亡率都很高,在我们的试点数据中,测量小的妇女后来被诊断为胎儿生长受限,可能代表胎儿-胎盘循环不良的严重表型。这些妊娠通常在短时间内符合紧急分娩的标准,特别是如果注意到脐动脉多普勒速度测量异常。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Early Onset Fetal Growth Restriction: Does Path to Diagnosis Impact Outcomes and Pathology?

Objective: To evaluate demographics and outcomes of maternal-fetal pairs in early onset fetal growth restriction (FGR) requiring delivery prior to 34 weeks' gestation based on ultrasound indication leading to diagnosis.

Study design: This is a descriptive study of maternal-fetal pairs with early FGR diagnosed prior to 30 weeks' gestation and delivering between 22w0d and 34w0d under the care of Wake Forest University Perinatology 01/2012-12/2016. Serial ultrasounds to assess fetal growth and umbilical artery flow Doppler velocimetry were evaluated. Pairs were dichotomized into those with maternal comorbidities leading to ultrasound diagnosis, and those with ultrasound indicated only by appreciation of uterine size less than dates on exam. Patient characteristics and outcomes were tracked. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed as appropriate.

Results: 56 pregnancies were identified with FGR prior to 30 weeks and subsequent delivery prior to 34 weeks. Common comorbidities present in the group with maternal comorbidities included chronic hypertension (30.5%), hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (36.1%), preexisting diabetes (13.9%), gestational diabetes (5.6%). None of the women in the S

Conclusion: Women measuring size less than dates in the mid-trimester should be evaluated by ultrasound without delays. Early FGR carries a high mortality rate in all cases and in our pilot data, women measuring small were diagnosed later with fetal growth restriction and may represent a severe phenotype with poor fetal-placental circulation. These pregnancies often met criteria for urgent delivery in a short time frame, especially if abnormal umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry was noted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Social and Cultural Issues of Menstruation and Abnormal Uterine Bleeding in Nepal Community Based Study of Rural Tribal Women’s Prepregnancy Health Time to Put Women-Controlled Multipurpose Prevention Technologies for Their Protection in Full Gear The Effects of COVID-19 on Pregnancy Outcomes, as well as the Impact on Fetuses and Newborns: Cross-Sectional Study Pneumoperitoneum in a Patient with Endometriosis and Bilateral Salpingectomy after Sexual Activity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1