COVID-19 患者的紧急气管插管:英国中心的经验

IF 1.5 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Anesthesiology Research and Practice Pub Date : 2020-12-10 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2020/8816729
Ajay Gandhi, Jagdish Sokhi, Chris Lockie, Patrick A Ward
{"title":"COVID-19 患者的紧急气管插管:英国中心的经验","authors":"Ajay Gandhi, Jagdish Sokhi, Chris Lockie, Patrick A Ward","doi":"10.1155/2020/8816729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This retrospective observational case series describes a single centre's preparations and experience of 53 emergency tracheal intubations in patients with COVID-19 respiratory failure. The findings of a contemporaneous online survey exploring technical and nontechnical aspects of airway management, completed by intubation team members, are also presented. Preparations included developing a COVID-19 intubation standard operating procedure and checklist, dedicated airway trolleys, a consultant-led mobile intubation team, and an airway education programme. Tracheal intubation was successful in all patients. Intubation first-pass success rate was 85%, first-line videolaryngoscopy use 79%, oxygen desaturation 49%, and hypotension 21%. Performance was consistent across all clinical areas. The main factor impeding first-pass success was larger diameter tracheal tubes. The majority of intubations was performed by consultant anaesthetists. Nonconsultant intubations demonstrated higher oxygen desaturation rates (75% vs. 45%, <i>p</i>=0.610) and lower first-pass success (0% vs. 92%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Survey respondents (<i>n</i> = 29) reported increased anxiety at the start of the pandemic, with statistically significant reduction as the pandemic progressed (median: 4/5 very high vs. 2/5 low anxiety, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Reported procedural/environmental challenges included performing tasks in personal protective equipment (62%), remote-site working (48%), and modification of normal practices (41%)-specifically, the use of larger diameter tracheal tubes (21%). Hypoxaemia was identified by 90% of respondents as the most challenging patient-related factor during intubations. Our findings demonstrate that a consultant-led mobile intubation team can safely perform tracheal intubation in critically ill COVID-19 patients across all clinical areas, aided by thorough preparation and training, despite heightened anxiety levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":7834,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology Research and Practice","volume":"2020 ","pages":"8816729"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7729388/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emergency Tracheal Intubation in Patients with COVID-19: Experience from a UK Centre.\",\"authors\":\"Ajay Gandhi, Jagdish Sokhi, Chris Lockie, Patrick A Ward\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2020/8816729\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This retrospective observational case series describes a single centre's preparations and experience of 53 emergency tracheal intubations in patients with COVID-19 respiratory failure. The findings of a contemporaneous online survey exploring technical and nontechnical aspects of airway management, completed by intubation team members, are also presented. Preparations included developing a COVID-19 intubation standard operating procedure and checklist, dedicated airway trolleys, a consultant-led mobile intubation team, and an airway education programme. Tracheal intubation was successful in all patients. Intubation first-pass success rate was 85%, first-line videolaryngoscopy use 79%, oxygen desaturation 49%, and hypotension 21%. Performance was consistent across all clinical areas. The main factor impeding first-pass success was larger diameter tracheal tubes. The majority of intubations was performed by consultant anaesthetists. Nonconsultant intubations demonstrated higher oxygen desaturation rates (75% vs. 45%, <i>p</i>=0.610) and lower first-pass success (0% vs. 92%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Survey respondents (<i>n</i> = 29) reported increased anxiety at the start of the pandemic, with statistically significant reduction as the pandemic progressed (median: 4/5 very high vs. 2/5 low anxiety, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Reported procedural/environmental challenges included performing tasks in personal protective equipment (62%), remote-site working (48%), and modification of normal practices (41%)-specifically, the use of larger diameter tracheal tubes (21%). Hypoxaemia was identified by 90% of respondents as the most challenging patient-related factor during intubations. Our findings demonstrate that a consultant-led mobile intubation team can safely perform tracheal intubation in critically ill COVID-19 patients across all clinical areas, aided by thorough preparation and training, despite heightened anxiety levels.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7834,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anesthesiology Research and Practice\",\"volume\":\"2020 \",\"pages\":\"8816729\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7729388/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anesthesiology Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8816729\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesiology Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8816729","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本回顾性观察病例系列描述了一个中心在为 COVID-19 呼吸衰竭患者进行 53 次紧急气管插管时的准备工作和经验。同时还介绍了由插管团队成员完成的一项在线调查的结果,该调查探讨了气道管理的技术和非技术方面。准备工作包括制定 COVID-19 插管标准操作程序和核对表、专用气道推车、顾问领导的移动插管团队以及气道教育计划。所有患者均成功进行了气管插管。插管一次成功率为 85%,一线视频喉镜使用率为 79%,氧饱和度下降率为 49%,低血压率为 21%。所有临床领域的表现一致。阻碍首次插管成功的主要因素是气管导管直径较大。大多数插管都是由麻醉顾问进行的。非顾问式插管的氧饱和度降低率较高(75% 对 45%,p=0.610),一次通过成功率较低(0% 对 92%,p < 0.001)。调查受访者(n = 29)表示在大流行开始时焦虑感增加,但随着大流行的发展,焦虑感明显减少(中位数:4/5 非常焦虑 vs. 2/5 低焦虑,p < 0.001)。所报告的程序/环境挑战包括穿戴个人防护设备执行任务(62%)、偏远地区工作(48%)和改变常规做法(41%),特别是使用直径更大的气管插管(21%)。90%的受访者认为低氧血症是插管过程中最棘手的患者相关因素。我们的研究结果表明,以顾问为主导的移动插管团队可以在所有临床领域安全地为 COVID-19 重症患者进行气管插管,尽管患者的焦虑程度会有所提高,但充分的准备和培训可以起到辅助作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Emergency Tracheal Intubation in Patients with COVID-19: Experience from a UK Centre.

This retrospective observational case series describes a single centre's preparations and experience of 53 emergency tracheal intubations in patients with COVID-19 respiratory failure. The findings of a contemporaneous online survey exploring technical and nontechnical aspects of airway management, completed by intubation team members, are also presented. Preparations included developing a COVID-19 intubation standard operating procedure and checklist, dedicated airway trolleys, a consultant-led mobile intubation team, and an airway education programme. Tracheal intubation was successful in all patients. Intubation first-pass success rate was 85%, first-line videolaryngoscopy use 79%, oxygen desaturation 49%, and hypotension 21%. Performance was consistent across all clinical areas. The main factor impeding first-pass success was larger diameter tracheal tubes. The majority of intubations was performed by consultant anaesthetists. Nonconsultant intubations demonstrated higher oxygen desaturation rates (75% vs. 45%, p=0.610) and lower first-pass success (0% vs. 92%, p < 0.001). Survey respondents (n = 29) reported increased anxiety at the start of the pandemic, with statistically significant reduction as the pandemic progressed (median: 4/5 very high vs. 2/5 low anxiety, p < 0.001). Reported procedural/environmental challenges included performing tasks in personal protective equipment (62%), remote-site working (48%), and modification of normal practices (41%)-specifically, the use of larger diameter tracheal tubes (21%). Hypoxaemia was identified by 90% of respondents as the most challenging patient-related factor during intubations. Our findings demonstrate that a consultant-led mobile intubation team can safely perform tracheal intubation in critically ill COVID-19 patients across all clinical areas, aided by thorough preparation and training, despite heightened anxiety levels.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Preoperative Medication Intervention on Early Postoperative Cognitive Function in Elderly Patients With Poor Sleep Quality. Early Postoperative Cognitive Performance After Total Arch Replacement: A Prospective Observational Study. Comparison on the Effectiveness of Intravenous Magnesium Sulphate and Intravenous Dexmedetomidine in Reducing Emergence Agitation in Adults Undergoing Otorhinolaryngology Surgery. Hypertension and Postoperative Outcomes: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Operating Room Professionals' Awareness of Possible Unconscious Auditory Perception During General Anesthesia: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1