预测临终时谨慎、偏好和决定的关键医师行为。

Q1 Arts and Humanities AJOB Empirical Bioethics Pub Date : 2021-10-01 Epub Date: 2020-12-31 DOI:10.1080/23294515.2020.1865476
Andre Morales, Alan Murphy, Joseph B Fanning, Shasha Gao, Kevan Schultz, Daniel E Hall, Amber Barnato
{"title":"预测临终时谨慎、偏好和决定的关键医师行为。","authors":"Andre Morales,&nbsp;Alan Murphy,&nbsp;Joseph B Fanning,&nbsp;Shasha Gao,&nbsp;Kevan Schultz,&nbsp;Daniel E Hall,&nbsp;Amber Barnato","doi":"10.1080/23294515.2020.1865476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study introduces an empirical approach for studying the role of prudence in physician treatment of end-of-life (EOL) decision making.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-methods analysis of transcripts from 88 simulated patient encounters in a multicenter study on EOL decision making. Physicians in internal medicine, emergency medicine, and critical care medicine were asked to evaluate a decompensating, end-stage cancer patient. Transcripts of the encounters were coded for actor, action, and content to capture the concept of Aristotelian prudence, and then quantitatively and qualitatively analyzed to identify actions associated with preference-concordant treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Focusing on codes that describe characteristics of physician-patient interaction, the code for physicians restating patient preferences was associated with avoiding intubation. Multiple codes were associated with secondary measures of preference-concordant treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Prudent actions can be identified empirically, and research focused on the virtue of prudence may provide a new avenue for assessment and training in EOL care.</p>","PeriodicalId":38118,"journal":{"name":"AJOB Empirical Bioethics","volume":"12 4","pages":"215-226"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23294515.2020.1865476","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Key Physician Behaviors that Predict Prudent, Preference Concordant Decisions at the End of Life.\",\"authors\":\"Andre Morales,&nbsp;Alan Murphy,&nbsp;Joseph B Fanning,&nbsp;Shasha Gao,&nbsp;Kevan Schultz,&nbsp;Daniel E Hall,&nbsp;Amber Barnato\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23294515.2020.1865476\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study introduces an empirical approach for studying the role of prudence in physician treatment of end-of-life (EOL) decision making.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-methods analysis of transcripts from 88 simulated patient encounters in a multicenter study on EOL decision making. Physicians in internal medicine, emergency medicine, and critical care medicine were asked to evaluate a decompensating, end-stage cancer patient. Transcripts of the encounters were coded for actor, action, and content to capture the concept of Aristotelian prudence, and then quantitatively and qualitatively analyzed to identify actions associated with preference-concordant treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Focusing on codes that describe characteristics of physician-patient interaction, the code for physicians restating patient preferences was associated with avoiding intubation. Multiple codes were associated with secondary measures of preference-concordant treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Prudent actions can be identified empirically, and research focused on the virtue of prudence may provide a new avenue for assessment and training in EOL care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AJOB Empirical Bioethics\",\"volume\":\"12 4\",\"pages\":\"215-226\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23294515.2020.1865476\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AJOB Empirical Bioethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23294515.2020.1865476\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/12/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJOB Empirical Bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23294515.2020.1865476","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/12/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

背景:本研究引入一种实证方法来研究审慎在医生治疗临终(EOL)决策中的作用。方法:采用混合方法分析多中心EOL决策研究中88例模拟患者遭遇的转录本。我们要求内科、急诊和重症医学的医生对一位失代偿的终末期癌症患者进行评估。为了捕捉亚里士多德审慎的概念,对这些遭遇的记录进行了编码,然后对其进行定量和定性分析,以确定与偏好一致治疗相关的行为。结果:重点关注描述医患互动特征的代码,医生重申患者偏好的代码与避免插管相关。多重编码与偏好-一致性治疗的二级测量相关。结论:审慎行为可通过经验识别,对审慎行为美德的研究可为EOL护理的评估和培训提供新的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Key Physician Behaviors that Predict Prudent, Preference Concordant Decisions at the End of Life.

Background: This study introduces an empirical approach for studying the role of prudence in physician treatment of end-of-life (EOL) decision making.

Methods: A mixed-methods analysis of transcripts from 88 simulated patient encounters in a multicenter study on EOL decision making. Physicians in internal medicine, emergency medicine, and critical care medicine were asked to evaluate a decompensating, end-stage cancer patient. Transcripts of the encounters were coded for actor, action, and content to capture the concept of Aristotelian prudence, and then quantitatively and qualitatively analyzed to identify actions associated with preference-concordant treatment.

Results: Focusing on codes that describe characteristics of physician-patient interaction, the code for physicians restating patient preferences was associated with avoiding intubation. Multiple codes were associated with secondary measures of preference-concordant treatment.

Conclusions: Prudent actions can be identified empirically, and research focused on the virtue of prudence may provide a new avenue for assessment and training in EOL care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AJOB Empirical Bioethics
AJOB Empirical Bioethics Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Enhancing Animals is "Still Genetics": Perspectives of Genome Scientists and Policymakers on Animal and Human Enhancement. Associations Between the Legalization and Implementation of Medical Aid in Dying and Suicide Rates in the United States. Ethics Consultation in U.S. Pediatric Hospitals: Adherence to National Practice Standards. Monitored and Cared for at Home? Privacy Concerns When Using Smart Home Health Technologies to Care for Older Persons. Advance Medical Decision-Making Differs Across First- and Third-Person Perspectives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1