Margo S Harrison, Ephrem Kirub, Tewodros Liyew, Biruk Teshome, Andrea Jimenez-Zambrano, Margaret Muldrow, Teklemariam Yarinbab
{"title":"埃塞俄比亚Mizan-Aman Mizan-Tepi大学教学医院综合急诊外科医生的表现:一项回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Margo S Harrison, Ephrem Kirub, Tewodros Liyew, Biruk Teshome, Andrea Jimenez-Zambrano, Margaret Muldrow, Teklemariam Yarinbab","doi":"10.1155/2021/8875560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Surgical physician extenders are used in Ethiopia and sub-Saharan Africa where there is a lack of surgical providers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We tested characteristics associated with and outcomes of births attended by an integrated emergency surgical officers (IESOs) as compared to midwives and physician providers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1,000 women in our convenience sample, data on birth attendant was missing on 5 women (0.5%). Of the remaining women, almost three-fourths (73.6%, <i>n</i> = 732) of women were attended by a midwife, almost a quarter were attended by an IESO (24.4%, <i>n</i> = 243), 10 women were attended by a physician with a General Practitioner level of training (1.0%), 5 women were delivered by an Ob/Gyn resident (0.5%), and 5 women were attended by an Ob/Gyn (0.5%). Women had a higher likelihood of being attended by an IESO than a midwife if they underwent forceps-assisted (RR 88.4, <i>p</i> < 0.05), vacuum-assisted (RR 45.2, <i>p</i> < 0.05), or cesarean birth (RR 161.8, <i>p</i> < 0.05) as compared to an unassisted vaginal birth. IESOs are performing more operative vaginal and cesarean births than other delivery providers. Outcomes of their deliveries are worse than those of midwives, but this is likely due to the acuity level of the patients and not the provider type.</p>","PeriodicalId":19439,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and Gynecology International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7803422/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance of Integrated Emergency Surgical Officers at Mizan-Tepi University Teaching Hospital, Mizan-Aman, Ethiopia: A Retrospective Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Margo S Harrison, Ephrem Kirub, Tewodros Liyew, Biruk Teshome, Andrea Jimenez-Zambrano, Margaret Muldrow, Teklemariam Yarinbab\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2021/8875560\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Surgical physician extenders are used in Ethiopia and sub-Saharan Africa where there is a lack of surgical providers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We tested characteristics associated with and outcomes of births attended by an integrated emergency surgical officers (IESOs) as compared to midwives and physician providers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1,000 women in our convenience sample, data on birth attendant was missing on 5 women (0.5%). Of the remaining women, almost three-fourths (73.6%, <i>n</i> = 732) of women were attended by a midwife, almost a quarter were attended by an IESO (24.4%, <i>n</i> = 243), 10 women were attended by a physician with a General Practitioner level of training (1.0%), 5 women were delivered by an Ob/Gyn resident (0.5%), and 5 women were attended by an Ob/Gyn (0.5%). Women had a higher likelihood of being attended by an IESO than a midwife if they underwent forceps-assisted (RR 88.4, <i>p</i> < 0.05), vacuum-assisted (RR 45.2, <i>p</i> < 0.05), or cesarean birth (RR 161.8, <i>p</i> < 0.05) as compared to an unassisted vaginal birth. IESOs are performing more operative vaginal and cesarean births than other delivery providers. Outcomes of their deliveries are worse than those of midwives, but this is likely due to the acuity level of the patients and not the provider type.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19439,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obstetrics and Gynecology International\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7803422/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obstetrics and Gynecology International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8875560\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics and Gynecology International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8875560","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
介绍:外科医师扩展器在埃塞俄比亚和撒哈拉以南非洲地区使用,那里缺乏外科医生。方法:与助产士和内科医生相比,我们测试了由综合急诊外科医生(IESOs)接生的新生儿的相关特征和结果。结果:在我们的便利样本中,1000名妇女中,有5名妇女(0.5%)缺少助产士的数据。在其余妇女中,近四分之三(73.6%,n = 732)的妇女由助产士接生,近四分之一的妇女由IESO接生(24.4%,n = 243), 10名妇女由具有全科医生培训水平的医生接生(1.0%),5名妇女由妇产科住院医生接生(0.5%),5名妇女由妇产科医生接生(0.5%)。与非辅助阴道分娩相比,产钳辅助分娩(RR 88.4, p < 0.05)、真空辅助分娩(RR 45.2, p < 0.05)或剖宫产(RR 161.8, p < 0.05)的妇女由IESO接生的可能性高于助产士。ieso比其他接生机构实施更多的阴道和剖宫产手术。他们的分娩结果比助产士差,但这可能是由于患者的敏锐程度,而不是提供者的类型。
Performance of Integrated Emergency Surgical Officers at Mizan-Tepi University Teaching Hospital, Mizan-Aman, Ethiopia: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Introduction: Surgical physician extenders are used in Ethiopia and sub-Saharan Africa where there is a lack of surgical providers.
Methods: We tested characteristics associated with and outcomes of births attended by an integrated emergency surgical officers (IESOs) as compared to midwives and physician providers.
Results: Of 1,000 women in our convenience sample, data on birth attendant was missing on 5 women (0.5%). Of the remaining women, almost three-fourths (73.6%, n = 732) of women were attended by a midwife, almost a quarter were attended by an IESO (24.4%, n = 243), 10 women were attended by a physician with a General Practitioner level of training (1.0%), 5 women were delivered by an Ob/Gyn resident (0.5%), and 5 women were attended by an Ob/Gyn (0.5%). Women had a higher likelihood of being attended by an IESO than a midwife if they underwent forceps-assisted (RR 88.4, p < 0.05), vacuum-assisted (RR 45.2, p < 0.05), or cesarean birth (RR 161.8, p < 0.05) as compared to an unassisted vaginal birth. IESOs are performing more operative vaginal and cesarean births than other delivery providers. Outcomes of their deliveries are worse than those of midwives, but this is likely due to the acuity level of the patients and not the provider type.
期刊介绍:
Obstetrics and Gynecology International is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that aims to provide a forum for scientists and clinical professionals working in obstetrics and gynecology. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to obstetrics, maternal-fetal medicine, general gynecology, gynecologic oncology, uro-gynecology, reproductive medicine and infertility, reproductive endocrinology, and sexual medicine.