慢性病中二元调节的新视角:二元调节连通性模型。

IF 6.6 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Health Psychology Review Pub Date : 2022-03-01 Epub Date: 2021-01-20 DOI:10.1080/17437199.2021.1874471
Evangelos C Karademas
{"title":"慢性病中二元调节的新视角:二元调节连通性模型。","authors":"Evangelos C Karademas","doi":"10.1080/17437199.2021.1874471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Several theoretical models have described the ways that patients and partners respond to a health problem. Most of these models are faced with limitations regarding the role of cognitive/emotional appraisals and coping behaviors, and the potential interactions between individual and dyadic variables. Therefore, new theoretical approaches are needed to capture the multiple processes that take place within dyadic adaptation to illness. Here, the major aspects of the dyadic adaptation/dyadic coping models are reviewed and their limitations are outlined. Moreover, a new theoretical approach to the dyadic-regulation processes that are important for adaptation to illness is proposed. The Dyadic-Regulation Connectivity Model emphasizes the concept of system connectivity and the role of central network hubs in dyadic regulation. Network hubs represent the common 'space' between intra- and inter-personal processes, and are closely connected to each other. The model posits that dyadic regulation processes evolve over time, all network hubs are fully responsive to changes in any part of the mechanism, while the entire mechanism is nested within the self- and the dyadic-system, the illness, and the broader socio-cultural contexts. The theoretical and research implications of the proposed model are also discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":48034,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17437199.2021.1874471","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A new perspective on dyadic regulation in chronic illness: the dyadic regulation connectivity model.\",\"authors\":\"Evangelos C Karademas\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17437199.2021.1874471\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Several theoretical models have described the ways that patients and partners respond to a health problem. Most of these models are faced with limitations regarding the role of cognitive/emotional appraisals and coping behaviors, and the potential interactions between individual and dyadic variables. Therefore, new theoretical approaches are needed to capture the multiple processes that take place within dyadic adaptation to illness. Here, the major aspects of the dyadic adaptation/dyadic coping models are reviewed and their limitations are outlined. Moreover, a new theoretical approach to the dyadic-regulation processes that are important for adaptation to illness is proposed. The Dyadic-Regulation Connectivity Model emphasizes the concept of system connectivity and the role of central network hubs in dyadic regulation. Network hubs represent the common 'space' between intra- and inter-personal processes, and are closely connected to each other. The model posits that dyadic regulation processes evolve over time, all network hubs are fully responsive to changes in any part of the mechanism, while the entire mechanism is nested within the self- and the dyadic-system, the illness, and the broader socio-cultural contexts. The theoretical and research implications of the proposed model are also discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48034,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Psychology Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17437199.2021.1874471\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Psychology Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2021.1874471\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2021.1874471","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

有几个理论模型描述了病人和伴侣对健康问题的反应方式。在认知/情绪评价和应对行为的作用以及个体变量和二元变量之间的潜在相互作用方面,大多数模型都面临着局限性。因此,需要新的理论方法来捕捉在对疾病的二元适应中发生的多个过程。这里,回顾了二元适应/二元应对模型的主要方面,并概述了它们的局限性。此外,还提出了一种新的理论方法来研究对疾病适应很重要的动态调节过程。双向调节连通性模型强调系统连通性的概念和中心网络枢纽在双向调节中的作用。网络枢纽代表了内部和人际过程之间的共同“空间”,并且彼此紧密相连。该模型假设二元调节过程随着时间的推移而演变,所有的网络枢纽都对机制的任何部分的变化做出充分的反应,而整个机制则嵌套在自我和二元系统、疾病和更广泛的社会文化背景中。本文还讨论了该模型的理论和研究意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A new perspective on dyadic regulation in chronic illness: the dyadic regulation connectivity model.

Several theoretical models have described the ways that patients and partners respond to a health problem. Most of these models are faced with limitations regarding the role of cognitive/emotional appraisals and coping behaviors, and the potential interactions between individual and dyadic variables. Therefore, new theoretical approaches are needed to capture the multiple processes that take place within dyadic adaptation to illness. Here, the major aspects of the dyadic adaptation/dyadic coping models are reviewed and their limitations are outlined. Moreover, a new theoretical approach to the dyadic-regulation processes that are important for adaptation to illness is proposed. The Dyadic-Regulation Connectivity Model emphasizes the concept of system connectivity and the role of central network hubs in dyadic regulation. Network hubs represent the common 'space' between intra- and inter-personal processes, and are closely connected to each other. The model posits that dyadic regulation processes evolve over time, all network hubs are fully responsive to changes in any part of the mechanism, while the entire mechanism is nested within the self- and the dyadic-system, the illness, and the broader socio-cultural contexts. The theoretical and research implications of the proposed model are also discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Psychology Review
Health Psychology Review PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
21.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: The publication of Health Psychology Review (HPR) marks a significant milestone in the field of health psychology, as it is the first review journal dedicated to this important and rapidly growing discipline. Edited by a highly respected team, HPR provides a critical platform for the review, development of theories, and conceptual advancements in health psychology. This prestigious international forum not only contributes to the progress of health psychology but also fosters its connection with the broader field of psychology and other related academic and professional domains. With its vital insights, HPR is a must-read for those involved in the study, teaching, and practice of health psychology, behavioral medicine, and related areas.
期刊最新文献
Good mental health in people with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review. The iterative development and refinement of health psychology theories through formal, dynamical systems modelling: a scoping review and initial expert-derived 'best practice' recommendations. The concept of treatment beliefs in children and adolescents with chronic health conditions: a scoping review. Barriers and enablers to maintaining self-management behaviours after attending a self-management support intervention for type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis. Acceptance and commitment therapy processes and their association with distress in cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1