负责任的数据科学教学:开辟新的教学领域。

IF 4.7 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-04-15 DOI:10.1007/s40593-021-00241-7
Armanda Lewis, Julia Stoyanovich
{"title":"负责任的数据科学教学:开辟新的教学领域。","authors":"Armanda Lewis, Julia Stoyanovich","doi":"10.1007/s40593-021-00241-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although an increasing number of ethical data science and AI courses is available, with many focusing specifically on technology and computer ethics, pedagogical approaches employed in these courses rely exclusively on texts rather than on algorithmic development or data analysis. In this paper we recount a recent experience in developing and teaching a technical course focused on responsible data science, which tackles the issues of ethics in AI, legal compliance, data quality, algorithmic fairness and diversity, transparency of data and algorithms, privacy, and data protection. Interpretability of machine-assisted decision-making is an important component of responsible data science that gives a good lens through which to see other responsible data science topics, including privacy and fairness. We provide emerging pedagogical best practices for teaching technical data science and AI courses that focus on interpretability, and tie responsible data science to current learning science and learning analytics research. We focus on a novel methodological notion of the <i>object-to-interpret-with</i>, a representation that helps students target metacognition involving interpretation and representation. In the context of interpreting machine learning models, we highlight the suitability of \"nutritional labels\"-a family of interpretability tools that are gaining popularity in responsible data science research and practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":46637,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education","volume":"32 3","pages":"783-807"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8049623/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Teaching Responsible Data Science: Charting New Pedagogical Territory.\",\"authors\":\"Armanda Lewis, Julia Stoyanovich\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40593-021-00241-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Although an increasing number of ethical data science and AI courses is available, with many focusing specifically on technology and computer ethics, pedagogical approaches employed in these courses rely exclusively on texts rather than on algorithmic development or data analysis. In this paper we recount a recent experience in developing and teaching a technical course focused on responsible data science, which tackles the issues of ethics in AI, legal compliance, data quality, algorithmic fairness and diversity, transparency of data and algorithms, privacy, and data protection. Interpretability of machine-assisted decision-making is an important component of responsible data science that gives a good lens through which to see other responsible data science topics, including privacy and fairness. We provide emerging pedagogical best practices for teaching technical data science and AI courses that focus on interpretability, and tie responsible data science to current learning science and learning analytics research. We focus on a novel methodological notion of the <i>object-to-interpret-with</i>, a representation that helps students target metacognition involving interpretation and representation. In the context of interpreting machine learning models, we highlight the suitability of \\\"nutritional labels\\\"-a family of interpretability tools that are gaining popularity in responsible data science research and practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46637,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education\",\"volume\":\"32 3\",\"pages\":\"783-807\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8049623/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00241-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/4/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00241-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/4/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管目前有越来越多的数据科学和人工智能伦理课程,其中许多课程特别关注技术和计算机伦理,但这些课程所采用的教学方法完全依赖于文本,而不是算法开发或数据分析。在本文中,我们讲述了最近开发和教授一门以负责任的数据科学为重点的技术课程的经验,该课程涉及人工智能伦理、法律合规性、数据质量、算法公平性和多样性、数据和算法的透明度、隐私和数据保护等问题。机器辅助决策的可解释性是负责任的数据科学的重要组成部分,它提供了一个很好的视角,通过它可以看到其他负责任的数据科学主题,包括隐私和公平性。我们为以可解释性为重点的技术数据科学和人工智能课程教学提供了新兴的最佳教学实践,并将负责任的数据科学与当前的学习科学和学习分析研究联系起来。我们将重点放在一个新颖的方法论概念--"解释对象"(object-to-interpret-with)上,这一表征可帮助学生瞄准涉及解释和表征的元认知。在解释机器学习模型的背景下,我们强调了 "营养标签 "的适用性--这是一系列可解释性工具,在负责任的数据科学研究和实践中越来越受欢迎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Teaching Responsible Data Science: Charting New Pedagogical Territory.

Although an increasing number of ethical data science and AI courses is available, with many focusing specifically on technology and computer ethics, pedagogical approaches employed in these courses rely exclusively on texts rather than on algorithmic development or data analysis. In this paper we recount a recent experience in developing and teaching a technical course focused on responsible data science, which tackles the issues of ethics in AI, legal compliance, data quality, algorithmic fairness and diversity, transparency of data and algorithms, privacy, and data protection. Interpretability of machine-assisted decision-making is an important component of responsible data science that gives a good lens through which to see other responsible data science topics, including privacy and fairness. We provide emerging pedagogical best practices for teaching technical data science and AI courses that focus on interpretability, and tie responsible data science to current learning science and learning analytics research. We focus on a novel methodological notion of the object-to-interpret-with, a representation that helps students target metacognition involving interpretation and representation. In the context of interpreting machine learning models, we highlight the suitability of "nutritional labels"-a family of interpretability tools that are gaining popularity in responsible data science research and practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education
International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS-
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
6.10%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: IJAIED publishes papers concerned with the application of AI to education. It aims to help the development of principles for the design of computer-based learning systems. Its premise is that such principles involve the modelling and representation of relevant aspects of knowledge, before implementation or during execution, and hence require the application of AI techniques and concepts. IJAIED has a very broad notion of the scope of AI and of a ''computer-based learning system'', as indicated by the following list of topics considered to be within the scope of IJAIED: adaptive and intelligent multimedia and hypermedia systemsagent-based learning environmentsAIED and teacher educationarchitectures for AIED systemsassessment and testing of learning outcomesauthoring systems and shells for AIED systemsbayesian and statistical methodscase-based systemscognitive developmentcognitive models of problem-solvingcognitive tools for learningcomputer-assisted language learningcomputer-supported collaborative learningdialogue (argumentation, explanation, negotiation, etc.) discovery environments and microworldsdistributed learning environmentseducational roboticsembedded training systemsempirical studies to inform the design of learning environmentsenvironments to support the learning of programmingevaluation of AIED systemsformal models of components of AIED systemshelp and advice systemshuman factors and interface designinstructional design principlesinstructional planningintelligent agents on the internetintelligent courseware for computer-based trainingintelligent tutoring systemsknowledge and skill acquisitionknowledge representation for instructionmodelling metacognitive skillsmodelling pedagogical interactionsmotivationnatural language interfaces for instructional systemsnetworked learning and teaching systemsneural models applied to AIED systemsperformance support systemspractical, real-world applications of AIED systemsqualitative reasoning in simulationssituated learning and cognitive apprenticeshipsocial and cultural aspects of learningstudent modelling and cognitive diagnosissupport for knowledge building communitiessupport for networked communicationtheories of learning and conceptual changetools for administration and curriculum integrationtools for the guided exploration of information resources
期刊最新文献
AI Adaptivity in a Mixed-Reality System Improves Learning Debiasing Education Algorithms Facial Expression Recognition for Examining Emotional Regulation in Synchronous Online Collaborative Learning Multilingual Age of Exposure 2.0 Examining the Effect of Assessment Construct Characteristics on Machine Learning Scoring of Scientific Argumentation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1