多参数mri超声融合前列腺活检在未确诊前列腺癌患者:超越卓越中心。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Aging Male Pub Date : 2020-12-01 Epub Date: 2021-01-15 DOI:10.1080/13685538.2021.1873263
Sadhna Verma, Joseph Zegar, Connor Hoge, John McGready, Abhinav Sidana
{"title":"多参数mri超声融合前列腺活检在未确诊前列腺癌患者:超越卓越中心。","authors":"Sadhna Verma,&nbsp;Joseph Zegar,&nbsp;Connor Hoge,&nbsp;John McGready,&nbsp;Abhinav Sidana","doi":"10.1080/13685538.2021.1873263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)-ultrasound (US) fusion prostate biopsy (FBx) has demonstrated increased accuracy for prostate cancer detection at designated centers of excellence. There is a concern if their results can be reproduced in smaller centers. Here, we evaluate the outcomes of FBx from a smaller academic center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of patients without a prior diagnosis of prostate cancer undergoing FBx from January 2014 to November 2019 was performed. Histopathological results were grouped into low-risk disease (Grade Group 1), intermediate-risk disease (Grade Group 2 and 3), and high-risk disease (Grade Group 4 or 5). Clinically significant (CS) prostate cancer was defined as Grade Group ≥ 2.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five hundred and six men were included. Median age (IQR) and PSA (IQR) were 65.2 (60.3-70.2) years and 6.9 (5.2-9.7) ng/ml, respectively. There was no difference in overall cancer detection between FBx and SBx (53.6% vs 56.4% <i>p</i> = .1507). CS cancer detection was significantly higher with FBx (39.6% vs 35.3, <i>p</i> = .0275). FBx also outperformed SBx in diagnosing CS disease in patients with prior history of negative prostate biopsy (36.9% vs 27.9%, <i>p</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FBx detects a higher proportion of clinically significant disease and a lower proportion of clinically insignificant disease compared to SBx, in line with outcomes demonstrated by centers of excellence.</p>","PeriodicalId":55542,"journal":{"name":"Aging Male","volume":"23 5","pages":"1570-1575"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13685538.2021.1873263","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multiparametric MRI-ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy in patients without prior diagnosis of prostate cancer: beyond centers of excellence.\",\"authors\":\"Sadhna Verma,&nbsp;Joseph Zegar,&nbsp;Connor Hoge,&nbsp;John McGready,&nbsp;Abhinav Sidana\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13685538.2021.1873263\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)-ultrasound (US) fusion prostate biopsy (FBx) has demonstrated increased accuracy for prostate cancer detection at designated centers of excellence. There is a concern if their results can be reproduced in smaller centers. Here, we evaluate the outcomes of FBx from a smaller academic center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of patients without a prior diagnosis of prostate cancer undergoing FBx from January 2014 to November 2019 was performed. Histopathological results were grouped into low-risk disease (Grade Group 1), intermediate-risk disease (Grade Group 2 and 3), and high-risk disease (Grade Group 4 or 5). Clinically significant (CS) prostate cancer was defined as Grade Group ≥ 2.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five hundred and six men were included. Median age (IQR) and PSA (IQR) were 65.2 (60.3-70.2) years and 6.9 (5.2-9.7) ng/ml, respectively. There was no difference in overall cancer detection between FBx and SBx (53.6% vs 56.4% <i>p</i> = .1507). CS cancer detection was significantly higher with FBx (39.6% vs 35.3, <i>p</i> = .0275). FBx also outperformed SBx in diagnosing CS disease in patients with prior history of negative prostate biopsy (36.9% vs 27.9%, <i>p</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FBx detects a higher proportion of clinically significant disease and a lower proportion of clinically insignificant disease compared to SBx, in line with outcomes demonstrated by centers of excellence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aging Male\",\"volume\":\"23 5\",\"pages\":\"1570-1575\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13685538.2021.1873263\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aging Male\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13685538.2021.1873263\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aging Male","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13685538.2021.1873263","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在指定的卓越中心,多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)-超声(US)融合前列腺活检(FBx)已经证明了前列腺癌检测的准确性。人们担心他们的结果能否在较小的研究中心重现。在这里,我们从一个较小的学术中心评估FBx的结果。方法:回顾性分析2014年1月至2019年11月未确诊前列腺癌接受FBx治疗的患者。组织病理学结果分为低危(1级组)、中危(2、3级组)和高危(4、5级组)。临床显著(CS)前列腺癌定义为≥2级组。结果:共纳入56名男性。中位年龄(IQR)和PSA (IQR)分别为65.2(60.3 ~ 70.2)岁和6.9 (5.2 ~ 9.7)ng/ml。FBx和SBx的总体癌症检出率无差异(53.6% vs 56.4% p = .1507)。FBx组CS癌检出率显著高于FBx组(39.6% vs 35.3%, p = 0.0275)。对于既往有前列腺活检阴性病史的患者,FBx在诊断CS疾病方面也优于SBx (36.9% vs 27.9%, p结论:与SBx相比,FBx检测出临床显著疾病的比例更高,而临床不显著疾病的比例更低,这与卓越中心所证明的结果一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Multiparametric MRI-ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy in patients without prior diagnosis of prostate cancer: beyond centers of excellence.

Purpose: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)-ultrasound (US) fusion prostate biopsy (FBx) has demonstrated increased accuracy for prostate cancer detection at designated centers of excellence. There is a concern if their results can be reproduced in smaller centers. Here, we evaluate the outcomes of FBx from a smaller academic center.

Methods: A retrospective review of patients without a prior diagnosis of prostate cancer undergoing FBx from January 2014 to November 2019 was performed. Histopathological results were grouped into low-risk disease (Grade Group 1), intermediate-risk disease (Grade Group 2 and 3), and high-risk disease (Grade Group 4 or 5). Clinically significant (CS) prostate cancer was defined as Grade Group ≥ 2.

Results: Five hundred and six men were included. Median age (IQR) and PSA (IQR) were 65.2 (60.3-70.2) years and 6.9 (5.2-9.7) ng/ml, respectively. There was no difference in overall cancer detection between FBx and SBx (53.6% vs 56.4% p = .1507). CS cancer detection was significantly higher with FBx (39.6% vs 35.3, p = .0275). FBx also outperformed SBx in diagnosing CS disease in patients with prior history of negative prostate biopsy (36.9% vs 27.9%, p < .001).

Conclusion: FBx detects a higher proportion of clinically significant disease and a lower proportion of clinically insignificant disease compared to SBx, in line with outcomes demonstrated by centers of excellence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Aging Male
Aging Male 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
33
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Aging Male , the official journal of the International Society for the Study of the Aging Male, is a multidisciplinary publication covering all aspects of male health throughout the aging process. The Journal is a well-recognized and respected resource for anyone interested in keeping up to date with developments in this field. It is published quarterly in one volume per year. The Journal publishes original peer-reviewed research papers as well as review papers and other appropriate educational material that provide researchers with an integrated perspective on this new, emerging specialty. Areas of interest include, but are not limited to: Diagnosis and treatment of late-onset hypogonadism Metabolic syndrome and related conditions Treatment of erectile dysfunction and related disorders Prostate cancer and benign prostate hyperplasia.
期刊最新文献
Comparative analysis of the safety and efficacy of 1470-nm diode laser enucleation of the prostate and plasmakinetic resection of prostate in the treatment of large volume benign prostatic hyperplasia (>80 ml). Efficacy and safety of PDE5 inhibitors in middle-aged and old patients with and without hypogonadism. Novel perspectives of testosterone therapy in men with functional hypogonadism: traversing the gaps of knowledge. Contribution of body mass index, waist circumference, and 25-OH-D3 on the risk of pre-diabetes mellitus in the Chinese population. Meta-analysis of the intervention effects of tai chi on fasting blood glucose, blood pressure and triglyceride in middle-aged and elderly people.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1