西班牙语版低视力生活质量问卷的验证

IF 2.2 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Journal of Optometry Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.optom.2021.01.004
Luis Pérez-Mañá , Genis Cardona , Yolanda Pardo-Cladellas , Clara Pérez-Mañá , Jaume Amorós-Martínez , Luis González-Sanchís , James S. Wolffsohn , Alfonso Antón
{"title":"西班牙语版低视力生活质量问卷的验证","authors":"Luis Pérez-Mañá ,&nbsp;Genis Cardona ,&nbsp;Yolanda Pardo-Cladellas ,&nbsp;Clara Pérez-Mañá ,&nbsp;Jaume Amorós-Martínez ,&nbsp;Luis González-Sanchís ,&nbsp;James S. Wolffsohn ,&nbsp;Alfonso Antón","doi":"10.1016/j.optom.2021.01.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To validate the Spanish Low Vision Qualify of Life (SLVQOL) questionnaire, a quality of life instrument specifically designed for patients with visual impairment, and evaluate its psychometric properties.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The study included 170 visually impaired patients and 195 healthy subjects. Participants were administered the SLVQOL, the NEI VFQ-25, and the EQ 5D-5L questionnaires. Reliability, test–retest reproducibility, feasibility, and construct validity of the SLVQOL were assessed. The Generalized Partial Credit Model was used to fit the data and the performance of each item was characterized using category response curves and item information.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The reliability of the SLVQOL was 0.981 (95% CI: 0.978–0.985). Test–retest reproducibility was good (ρ<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.864, <em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->.001). A cut-off point of 105 or 106 was optimal to detect visual impairment, with a sensitivity of 95.4% and a specificity of 91.8%. Construct validity was shown by the corresponding convergence or divergence correlations between the score of the SLVQOL and its dimensions and the overall and partial scores of the NEI VFQ-25 and the EQ 5D-5L. Item response theory analysis showed discrimination and information parameters ranging from 0.539 to 3.063 and from −1.894 to 1.074, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The SLVQOL was able to quantitatively assess and identify differences in the quality of life among patients with visual impairment and normal subjects. The evaluated psychometric properties suggest that this tool has excellent validity, internal consistency, and reproducibility, but may benefit from a reduction of the number of items.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Optometry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.optom.2021.01.004","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of the Spanish version of the Low Vision Quality of Life Questionnaire\",\"authors\":\"Luis Pérez-Mañá ,&nbsp;Genis Cardona ,&nbsp;Yolanda Pardo-Cladellas ,&nbsp;Clara Pérez-Mañá ,&nbsp;Jaume Amorós-Martínez ,&nbsp;Luis González-Sanchís ,&nbsp;James S. Wolffsohn ,&nbsp;Alfonso Antón\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.optom.2021.01.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To validate the Spanish Low Vision Qualify of Life (SLVQOL) questionnaire, a quality of life instrument specifically designed for patients with visual impairment, and evaluate its psychometric properties.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The study included 170 visually impaired patients and 195 healthy subjects. Participants were administered the SLVQOL, the NEI VFQ-25, and the EQ 5D-5L questionnaires. Reliability, test–retest reproducibility, feasibility, and construct validity of the SLVQOL were assessed. The Generalized Partial Credit Model was used to fit the data and the performance of each item was characterized using category response curves and item information.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The reliability of the SLVQOL was 0.981 (95% CI: 0.978–0.985). Test–retest reproducibility was good (ρ<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.864, <em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->.001). A cut-off point of 105 or 106 was optimal to detect visual impairment, with a sensitivity of 95.4% and a specificity of 91.8%. Construct validity was shown by the corresponding convergence or divergence correlations between the score of the SLVQOL and its dimensions and the overall and partial scores of the NEI VFQ-25 and the EQ 5D-5L. Item response theory analysis showed discrimination and information parameters ranging from 0.539 to 3.063 and from −1.894 to 1.074, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The SLVQOL was able to quantitatively assess and identify differences in the quality of life among patients with visual impairment and normal subjects. The evaluated psychometric properties suggest that this tool has excellent validity, internal consistency, and reproducibility, but may benefit from a reduction of the number of items.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46407,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Optometry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.optom.2021.01.004\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Optometry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888429621000200\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Optometry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888429621000200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的验证西班牙低视力生活质量问卷(SLVQOL)这一专为视力障碍患者设计的生活质量问卷,并评价其心理测量学特性。方法选取视障患者170例,正常人195例。采用SLVQOL问卷、NEI VFQ-25问卷和EQ 5D-5L问卷。评估了SLVQOL的信度、重测重现性、可行性和结构效度。采用广义部分信用模型对数据进行拟合,并利用类别反应曲线和项目信息对每个项目的表现进行表征。结果SLVQOL的信度为0.981 (95% CI: 0.978 ~ 0.985)。重测重现性好(ρ = 0.864, P <措施)。分界点105或106是检测视力障碍的最佳选择,灵敏度为95.4%,特异性为91.8%。SLVQOL及其各维度的得分与NEI VFQ-25和EQ 5D-5L的总分和部分得分之间存在相应的收敛或发散相关,表明了结构效度。项目反应理论分析表明,辨别度和信息参数分别在0.539 ~ 3.063和- 1.894 ~ 1.074之间。结论SLVQOL能够定量评估和识别视力障碍患者与正常人生活质量的差异。经评估的心理测量特性表明,该工具具有极好的效度、内部一致性和可重复性,但可能受益于项目数量的减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validation of the Spanish version of the Low Vision Quality of Life Questionnaire

Purpose

To validate the Spanish Low Vision Qualify of Life (SLVQOL) questionnaire, a quality of life instrument specifically designed for patients with visual impairment, and evaluate its psychometric properties.

Methods

The study included 170 visually impaired patients and 195 healthy subjects. Participants were administered the SLVQOL, the NEI VFQ-25, and the EQ 5D-5L questionnaires. Reliability, test–retest reproducibility, feasibility, and construct validity of the SLVQOL were assessed. The Generalized Partial Credit Model was used to fit the data and the performance of each item was characterized using category response curves and item information.

Results

The reliability of the SLVQOL was 0.981 (95% CI: 0.978–0.985). Test–retest reproducibility was good (ρ = 0.864, P < .001). A cut-off point of 105 or 106 was optimal to detect visual impairment, with a sensitivity of 95.4% and a specificity of 91.8%. Construct validity was shown by the corresponding convergence or divergence correlations between the score of the SLVQOL and its dimensions and the overall and partial scores of the NEI VFQ-25 and the EQ 5D-5L. Item response theory analysis showed discrimination and information parameters ranging from 0.539 to 3.063 and from −1.894 to 1.074, respectively.

Conclusion

The SLVQOL was able to quantitatively assess and identify differences in the quality of life among patients with visual impairment and normal subjects. The evaluated psychometric properties suggest that this tool has excellent validity, internal consistency, and reproducibility, but may benefit from a reduction of the number of items.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Optometry
Journal of Optometry OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
66 days
期刊最新文献
Analysis of patient referrals from primary care to ophthalmology. The role of the optometrist Corneal higher-order aberrations in different types of irregular cornea Intraocular pressure and its association with ocular biometrics in Iranian children Comparison of macular thickness in diabetic patients acquired from optical coherence tomography mode and optical coherence tomography angiography mode in Cirrus HD-OCT 5000 JOptom's Web of Science (WoS) impact factor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1