与 A 线自回归指数相比,使用灌注指数预测儿童麻醉深度的变化:一项观察性研究。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.bjane.2021.04.030
{"title":"与 A 线自回归指数相比,使用灌注指数预测儿童麻醉深度的变化:一项观察性研究。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.bjane.2021.04.030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>We investigated the performance of the Perfusion Index (PI) derived from pulse oximetry waveform as a tool for assessment of anesthetic depth in comparison with A-line Autoregression Index (AAI) derived from analysis of Middle-Latency Auditory Evoked Potentials (MLAEP) waveform integrated by aepEXplus monitor in children receiving sevoflurane anesthesia for tonsillectomy.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Forty-one patients (4...12 years old) were included in this study. The PI and AAI were recorded simultaneously every minute during different stages of anesthesia delivery. The statistical tests included descriptive analysis, significance tests, correlation tests, and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve. The AAI served as a reference.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The PI significantly decreased during light anesthesia and recovery, and significantly increased during deeper planes of anesthesia, with an inverse mirror-image relationship with the AAI. A negative correlation of low to moderate degree was detected between PI and AAI during the study (<em>p</em>.ß&gt;.ß0.05), that reached a statistical significance at the 5th minute during sevoflurane mask induction (r.ß=.ß...0.457, <em>p</em>.ß=.ß0.008). ROC analysis at an AAI &lt; 25 extracted the best cut-off value for PI before intubation as 1.48 (AUC.ß=.ß0.698 [0.537...0.859], 94.4% sensitivity, 44.5% specificity) and at 10-minute intraoperatively as 2.4 (AUC.ß=.ß0.537 [0.354...0.721], 91.7% sensitivity, 31% specificity). During recovery, at an AAI.ß....ß50, the best cutoff was 1.82 (AUC.ß=.ß0.661 [0.46...0.863], 100% sensitivity and 50% specificity) 2 minutes before spontaneous eye opening.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Compared with the AAI, the PI can track changes in depth of anesthesia in pediatric patients undergoing tonsillectomy under sevoflurane anesthesia.</p></div><div><h3>Trial registration</h3><p>Clinical Trials. Gov. Identifier: NCT03412214.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":32356,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0104001421001986/pdfft?md5=9d7ab6c18e2820e353ea18a452343e65&pid=1-s2.0-S0104001421001986-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using the Perfusion Index to predict changes in the depth of anesthesia in children compared with the A-line Autoregression Index: an observational study\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bjane.2021.04.030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>We investigated the performance of the Perfusion Index (PI) derived from pulse oximetry waveform as a tool for assessment of anesthetic depth in comparison with A-line Autoregression Index (AAI) derived from analysis of Middle-Latency Auditory Evoked Potentials (MLAEP) waveform integrated by aepEXplus monitor in children receiving sevoflurane anesthesia for tonsillectomy.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Forty-one patients (4...12 years old) were included in this study. The PI and AAI were recorded simultaneously every minute during different stages of anesthesia delivery. The statistical tests included descriptive analysis, significance tests, correlation tests, and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve. The AAI served as a reference.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The PI significantly decreased during light anesthesia and recovery, and significantly increased during deeper planes of anesthesia, with an inverse mirror-image relationship with the AAI. A negative correlation of low to moderate degree was detected between PI and AAI during the study (<em>p</em>.ß&gt;.ß0.05), that reached a statistical significance at the 5th minute during sevoflurane mask induction (r.ß=.ß...0.457, <em>p</em>.ß=.ß0.008). ROC analysis at an AAI &lt; 25 extracted the best cut-off value for PI before intubation as 1.48 (AUC.ß=.ß0.698 [0.537...0.859], 94.4% sensitivity, 44.5% specificity) and at 10-minute intraoperatively as 2.4 (AUC.ß=.ß0.537 [0.354...0.721], 91.7% sensitivity, 31% specificity). During recovery, at an AAI.ß....ß50, the best cutoff was 1.82 (AUC.ß=.ß0.661 [0.46...0.863], 100% sensitivity and 50% specificity) 2 minutes before spontaneous eye opening.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Compared with the AAI, the PI can track changes in depth of anesthesia in pediatric patients undergoing tonsillectomy under sevoflurane anesthesia.</p></div><div><h3>Trial registration</h3><p>Clinical Trials. Gov. Identifier: NCT03412214.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":32356,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0104001421001986/pdfft?md5=9d7ab6c18e2820e353ea18a452343e65&pid=1-s2.0-S0104001421001986-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0104001421001986\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0104001421001986","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:我们研究了在接受七氟醚麻醉进行扁桃体切除术的儿童中,根据脉搏氧饱和度波形得出的血流灌注指数(PI)作为麻醉深度评估工具的性能,与通过分析 aepEXplus 监护仪整合的中迟听觉诱发电位(MLAEP)波形得出的 A 线自回归指数(AAI)的比较:本研究共纳入 41 名患者(4-12 岁)。在麻醉实施的不同阶段,每分钟同时记录 PI 和 AAI。统计检验包括描述性分析、显著性检验、相关性检验和接收者操作特征曲线(ROC)。AAI 作为参考值:结果:PI 在轻度麻醉和恢复期明显下降,在深度麻醉期明显上升,与 AAI 呈反镜像关系。在研究期间,PI 与 AAI 之间存在中低度负相关(p > 0.05),在七氟醚面罩诱导的第 5 分钟达到统计学意义(r = -0.457,p = 0.008)。在 AAI < 25 时进行 ROC 分析,得出插管前 PI 的最佳临界值为 1.48(AUC = 0.698 [0.537-0.859],灵敏度为 94.4%,特异度为 44.5%),术中 10 分钟时为 2.4(AUC = 0.537 [0.354-0.721],灵敏度为 91.7%,特异度为 31%)。在恢复过程中,当 AAI ≥ 50 时,最佳临界值为自发睁眼前 2 分钟的 1.82(AUC = 0.661 [0.46-0.863],敏感性 100%,特异性 50%):结论:与 AAI 相比,PI 可以跟踪在七氟醚麻醉下进行扁桃体切除术的儿童患者的麻醉深度变化:试验注册:Clinical Trials.Gov:NCT03412214。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Using the Perfusion Index to predict changes in the depth of anesthesia in children compared with the A-line Autoregression Index: an observational study

Background

We investigated the performance of the Perfusion Index (PI) derived from pulse oximetry waveform as a tool for assessment of anesthetic depth in comparison with A-line Autoregression Index (AAI) derived from analysis of Middle-Latency Auditory Evoked Potentials (MLAEP) waveform integrated by aepEXplus monitor in children receiving sevoflurane anesthesia for tonsillectomy.

Methods

Forty-one patients (4...12 years old) were included in this study. The PI and AAI were recorded simultaneously every minute during different stages of anesthesia delivery. The statistical tests included descriptive analysis, significance tests, correlation tests, and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve. The AAI served as a reference.

Results

The PI significantly decreased during light anesthesia and recovery, and significantly increased during deeper planes of anesthesia, with an inverse mirror-image relationship with the AAI. A negative correlation of low to moderate degree was detected between PI and AAI during the study (p.ß>.ß0.05), that reached a statistical significance at the 5th minute during sevoflurane mask induction (r.ß=.ß...0.457, p.ß=.ß0.008). ROC analysis at an AAI < 25 extracted the best cut-off value for PI before intubation as 1.48 (AUC.ß=.ß0.698 [0.537...0.859], 94.4% sensitivity, 44.5% specificity) and at 10-minute intraoperatively as 2.4 (AUC.ß=.ß0.537 [0.354...0.721], 91.7% sensitivity, 31% specificity). During recovery, at an AAI.ß....ß50, the best cutoff was 1.82 (AUC.ß=.ß0.661 [0.46...0.863], 100% sensitivity and 50% specificity) 2 minutes before spontaneous eye opening.

Conclusions

Compared with the AAI, the PI can track changes in depth of anesthesia in pediatric patients undergoing tonsillectomy under sevoflurane anesthesia.

Trial registration

Clinical Trials. Gov. Identifier: NCT03412214.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
88
审稿时长
68 days
期刊最新文献
Assessment of superior vena cava diameter and collapsibility index in liver transplantation: a prospective observational study The debate on antifibrinolytics in liver transplantation: always, never, or sometimes? Comparison of propofol-ketamine and propofol-fentanyl combinations for sedation in patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy: a randomized clinical trial Intraoperative hypotension and postoperative delirium in elderly male patients undergoing laryngectomy: a single-center retrospective cohort study The efficacy of buprenorphine compared with dexmedetomidine in spinal anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1