临床数据摘要:一项研究

Valerie J M Watzlaf, Patty T Sheridan, Amal A Alzu'bi, Laura Chau
{"title":"临床数据摘要:一项研究","authors":"Valerie J M Watzlaf, Patty T Sheridan, Amal A Alzu'bi, Laura Chau","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This is the second part in a two-part research study on clinical data abstraction.<sup>1</sup> Clinical data abstraction is the process of capturing key administrative and clinical data elements from a medical record. Very little is known about how the abstraction function is organized and managed today. A research study to gather data on how the clinical data abstraction function is managed in healthcare organizations across the country was performed. Results show that the majority of the healthcare organizations surveyed have a decentralized system, still perform the abstraction in-house as part of the coding workflow, and use manual abstraction followed by natural language processing (NLP) and simple query. The qualifications and training of abstractors varied across abstraction functions, however coders followed by nurses and health information management (HIM) professionals were the three top performers in abstraction. While, in general, abstraction is decentralized in most enterprises, two enterprise-wide abstraction models emerged from our study. In Model 1, the HIM department is responsible for coding, as well as all of the abstraction functions except the cancer registry and trauma registry abstraction. In Model 2, the quality department is responsible for all of the abstraction functions except the cancer registry, trauma registry, and coding function.</p>","PeriodicalId":40052,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives in health information management / AHIMA, American Health Information Management Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8120675/pdf/phim0018-0001h.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Data Abstraction: A Research Study.\",\"authors\":\"Valerie J M Watzlaf, Patty T Sheridan, Amal A Alzu'bi, Laura Chau\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This is the second part in a two-part research study on clinical data abstraction.<sup>1</sup> Clinical data abstraction is the process of capturing key administrative and clinical data elements from a medical record. Very little is known about how the abstraction function is organized and managed today. A research study to gather data on how the clinical data abstraction function is managed in healthcare organizations across the country was performed. Results show that the majority of the healthcare organizations surveyed have a decentralized system, still perform the abstraction in-house as part of the coding workflow, and use manual abstraction followed by natural language processing (NLP) and simple query. The qualifications and training of abstractors varied across abstraction functions, however coders followed by nurses and health information management (HIM) professionals were the three top performers in abstraction. While, in general, abstraction is decentralized in most enterprises, two enterprise-wide abstraction models emerged from our study. In Model 1, the HIM department is responsible for coding, as well as all of the abstraction functions except the cancer registry and trauma registry abstraction. In Model 2, the quality department is responsible for all of the abstraction functions except the cancer registry, trauma registry, and coding function.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":40052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perspectives in health information management / AHIMA, American Health Information Management Association\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8120675/pdf/phim0018-0001h.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perspectives in health information management / AHIMA, American Health Information Management Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives in health information management / AHIMA, American Health Information Management Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1 临床数据摘要是从医疗记录中获取关键的管理和临床数据元素的过程。1 临床数据抽取是指从病历中获取关键的行政和临床数据元素的过程。目前,人们对抽取功能的组织和管理方式知之甚少。为了收集全国医疗机构如何管理临床数据摘要功能的数据,我们开展了一项调查研究。结果显示,大多数受访医疗机构都有一个分散的系统,仍在内部进行摘要,作为编码工作流程的一部分,并使用人工摘要,然后进行自然语言处理(NLP)和简单查询。不同抽象功能的抽象人员的资质和培训各不相同,但编码员、护士和医疗信息管理 (HIM) 专业人员是抽象工作中表现最出色的三类人员。一般来说,大多数企业的抽取工作都是分散进行的,但我们的研究发现了两种企业范围内的抽取模式。在模式 1 中,医疗信息管理部门负责编码以及除癌症登记和创伤登记抽取以外的所有抽取功能。在模式 2 中,质量部门负责除癌症登记、创伤登记和编码功能以外的所有抽象功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical Data Abstraction: A Research Study.

This is the second part in a two-part research study on clinical data abstraction.1 Clinical data abstraction is the process of capturing key administrative and clinical data elements from a medical record. Very little is known about how the abstraction function is organized and managed today. A research study to gather data on how the clinical data abstraction function is managed in healthcare organizations across the country was performed. Results show that the majority of the healthcare organizations surveyed have a decentralized system, still perform the abstraction in-house as part of the coding workflow, and use manual abstraction followed by natural language processing (NLP) and simple query. The qualifications and training of abstractors varied across abstraction functions, however coders followed by nurses and health information management (HIM) professionals were the three top performers in abstraction. While, in general, abstraction is decentralized in most enterprises, two enterprise-wide abstraction models emerged from our study. In Model 1, the HIM department is responsible for coding, as well as all of the abstraction functions except the cancer registry and trauma registry abstraction. In Model 2, the quality department is responsible for all of the abstraction functions except the cancer registry, trauma registry, and coding function.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Perspectives in Health Information Management is a scholarly, peer-reviewed research journal whose mission is to advance health information management practice and to encourage interdisciplinary collaboration between HIM professionals and others in disciplines supporting the advancement of the management of health information. The primary focus is to promote the linkage of practice, education, and research and to provide contributions to the understanding or improvement of health information management processes and outcomes.
期刊最新文献
The Role of Clinical Decision Support Systems in Preventing Stroke in Primary Care: A Systematic Review. Best Practices for the Design of COVID-19 Dashboards. Medical Scribes: Symptom or Cause of Impeded Evolution of a Transformative Artificial Intelligence in the Electronic Health Record? Risk of Duplicate ICD Codes for Orthopedic and Injury Related Research. Quality Assessment of the Road Traffic Health and Safety Apps with a Focus on the Five Rights of Information Management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1