在坦桑尼亚乞力马扎罗市小学生中,用加速度计对自我报告的身体活动进行验证:一项试点研究。

Q2 Multidisciplinary AAS Open Research Pub Date : 2020-08-21 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.12688/aasopenres.13118.1
Mary Vincent Mosha, Elizabeth Kasagama, Philip Ayieko, Jim Todd, Sia E Msuya, Heiner Grosskurth, Suzanne Filteau
{"title":"在坦桑尼亚乞力马扎罗市小学生中,用加速度计对自我报告的身体活动进行验证:一项试点研究。","authors":"Mary Vincent Mosha,&nbsp;Elizabeth Kasagama,&nbsp;Philip Ayieko,&nbsp;Jim Todd,&nbsp;Sia E Msuya,&nbsp;Heiner Grosskurth,&nbsp;Suzanne Filteau","doi":"10.12688/aasopenres.13118.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Self-reports are commonly used to assess physical activity in children.  Existing self-reports for physical activity have not been validated for use among primary school children in Kilimanjaro, Tanzania. In order to understand if primary school children can accurately report their physical activity, we examined the validity of self-reported physical activity against accelerometer measured physical activity. <b>Methods:</b> A community based cross-sectional study was conducted from May to July, 2018 among four primary schools in Moshi municipal and Moshi rural districts, Kilimanjaro, Tanzania.  A total of 51 primary school children aged 9-11 years were enrolled using a simple random sampling technique. A self-reported questionnaire was used to collect physical activity related variables. In addition, children wore accelerometers for seven consecutive days to capture physical activity movements. Spearman's rank test and Bland Altman plots were used for assessing validity and agreement between self-reports and accelerometer moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA). <b>Results:</b> The mean age of the study participants was 10 (SD=0.8) years. Majority of the study participants were female 32 (63%). A moderate, positive correlation was found between self-reports and accelerometer MVPA (rho=0.36, p=0.009). Accelerometer had higher MVPA compared to self-reports. Children who reported walking to school had higher MVPA for both accelerometer and self- reports compared to children who use other means of transport to school, e.g. school buses (p < 0.001). <b>Conclusions:</b> This study found the moderate positive correlation between self-reports and accelerometers. Self-reports are prone to errors due to recall bias, and this interferes their validity.  More research is needed to develop better self-reported measures with specific activities which can easily be recalled by children. Also, researchers have to be aware of self-reports validity limitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":34179,"journal":{"name":"AAS Open Research","volume":" ","pages":"40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8132476/pdf/","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of self-reported physical activity by accelerometry among primary school children in Kilimanjaro, Tanzania: a pilot study.\",\"authors\":\"Mary Vincent Mosha,&nbsp;Elizabeth Kasagama,&nbsp;Philip Ayieko,&nbsp;Jim Todd,&nbsp;Sia E Msuya,&nbsp;Heiner Grosskurth,&nbsp;Suzanne Filteau\",\"doi\":\"10.12688/aasopenres.13118.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Self-reports are commonly used to assess physical activity in children.  Existing self-reports for physical activity have not been validated for use among primary school children in Kilimanjaro, Tanzania. In order to understand if primary school children can accurately report their physical activity, we examined the validity of self-reported physical activity against accelerometer measured physical activity. <b>Methods:</b> A community based cross-sectional study was conducted from May to July, 2018 among four primary schools in Moshi municipal and Moshi rural districts, Kilimanjaro, Tanzania.  A total of 51 primary school children aged 9-11 years were enrolled using a simple random sampling technique. A self-reported questionnaire was used to collect physical activity related variables. In addition, children wore accelerometers for seven consecutive days to capture physical activity movements. Spearman's rank test and Bland Altman plots were used for assessing validity and agreement between self-reports and accelerometer moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA). <b>Results:</b> The mean age of the study participants was 10 (SD=0.8) years. Majority of the study participants were female 32 (63%). A moderate, positive correlation was found between self-reports and accelerometer MVPA (rho=0.36, p=0.009). Accelerometer had higher MVPA compared to self-reports. Children who reported walking to school had higher MVPA for both accelerometer and self- reports compared to children who use other means of transport to school, e.g. school buses (p < 0.001). <b>Conclusions:</b> This study found the moderate positive correlation between self-reports and accelerometers. Self-reports are prone to errors due to recall bias, and this interferes their validity.  More research is needed to develop better self-reported measures with specific activities which can easily be recalled by children. Also, researchers have to be aware of self-reports validity limitation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34179,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AAS Open Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"40\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8132476/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AAS Open Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12688/aasopenres.13118.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Multidisciplinary\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AAS Open Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/aasopenres.13118.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

背景:自我报告通常用于评估儿童的身体活动。现有的身体活动自我报告尚未在坦桑尼亚乞力马扎罗市小学生中得到验证。为了了解小学生是否能准确地报告他们的身体活动,我们检验了自我报告的身体活动与加速度计测量的身体活动的有效性。方法:2018年5 - 7月,对坦桑尼亚乞力马扎罗市莫希市和莫希农村地区的4所小学进行了基于社区的横断面研究。采用简单的随机抽样方法,对51名9-11岁的小学生进行了调查。采用自我报告问卷收集体力活动相关变量。此外,孩子们连续7天佩戴加速度计来记录身体活动。采用Spearman’s rank检验和Bland Altman图来评估自我报告与加速度计中高强度体力活动(MVPA)之间的效度和一致性。结果:研究参与者的平均年龄为10岁(SD=0.8)。大多数研究参与者是32岁的女性(63%)。自我报告与加速度计MVPA之间存在中度正相关(rho=0.36, p=0.009)。与自我报告相比,加速度计的MVPA更高。与使用其他交通工具(如校车)上学的儿童相比,报告步行上学的儿童在加速度计和自我报告中都具有更高的MVPA (p < 0.001)。结论:本研究发现自我报告与加速度计之间存在中度正相关。由于回忆偏差,自我报告容易出错,这干扰了它们的有效性。需要进行更多的研究,以开发更好的自我报告措施,其中包括儿童容易回忆起的具体活动。同时,研究者必须意识到自我报告的效度限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validation of self-reported physical activity by accelerometry among primary school children in Kilimanjaro, Tanzania: a pilot study.

Background: Self-reports are commonly used to assess physical activity in children.  Existing self-reports for physical activity have not been validated for use among primary school children in Kilimanjaro, Tanzania. In order to understand if primary school children can accurately report their physical activity, we examined the validity of self-reported physical activity against accelerometer measured physical activity. Methods: A community based cross-sectional study was conducted from May to July, 2018 among four primary schools in Moshi municipal and Moshi rural districts, Kilimanjaro, Tanzania.  A total of 51 primary school children aged 9-11 years were enrolled using a simple random sampling technique. A self-reported questionnaire was used to collect physical activity related variables. In addition, children wore accelerometers for seven consecutive days to capture physical activity movements. Spearman's rank test and Bland Altman plots were used for assessing validity and agreement between self-reports and accelerometer moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA). Results: The mean age of the study participants was 10 (SD=0.8) years. Majority of the study participants were female 32 (63%). A moderate, positive correlation was found between self-reports and accelerometer MVPA (rho=0.36, p=0.009). Accelerometer had higher MVPA compared to self-reports. Children who reported walking to school had higher MVPA for both accelerometer and self- reports compared to children who use other means of transport to school, e.g. school buses (p < 0.001). Conclusions: This study found the moderate positive correlation between self-reports and accelerometers. Self-reports are prone to errors due to recall bias, and this interferes their validity.  More research is needed to develop better self-reported measures with specific activities which can easily be recalled by children. Also, researchers have to be aware of self-reports validity limitation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AAS Open Research
AAS Open Research Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Delays in initiating rabies post-exposure prophylaxis among dog bite victims in Wakiso and Kampala districts, Uganda. Stigma-directed services (Stig2Health) to improve 'linkage to care' for people living with HIV in rural Tanzania: study protocol for a nested pre-post implementation study within the Kilombero and Ulanga Antiretroviral Cohort. Case studies from the experience of early career researchers in East Africa in building community engagement in research. Small area estimation for South African resource distribution and policy impacts during COVID-19 Building community and public engagement in research – the experience of early career researchers in East Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1