急诊部门效率驱动的医生调度。

IF 1.2 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Health Systems Pub Date : 2019-09-17 DOI:10.1080/20476965.2019.1666036
Fanny Camiat, Marìa I Restrepo, Jean-Marc Chauny, Nadia Lahrichi, Louis-Martin Rousseau
{"title":"急诊部门效率驱动的医生调度。","authors":"Fanny Camiat,&nbsp;Marìa I Restrepo,&nbsp;Jean-Marc Chauny,&nbsp;Nadia Lahrichi,&nbsp;Louis-Martin Rousseau","doi":"10.1080/20476965.2019.1666036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of this study is two-fold: to propose an alternative approach for computing the productivity of physicians in emergency departments (EDs); and, to allocate productivity-driven schedules to ED physicians so as to align physician productivity with demand (patient arrivals), without decreasing fairness between physicians, in order to improve patient wait times. Historical data between 2008 and 2017 from the Sacré-Coeur Montreal Hospital ED is analysed and used to predict the demand and to estimate the productivity of each physician. These estimates are incorporated into a mathematical programming model that identifies feasible schedules to physicians that minimise the difference between patients' demand and physicians' productivity, along with the violation of physicians' preferences and fairness in the distribution of shifts. Results on real-world-based data show that when physician productivity is included in the allocation of schedules, demand under-covering is reduced by 10.85% and the fairness between physicians is maintained. However, physicians' preferences (e.g., sum of the differences between the number of wanted shifts and the number of allocated shifts) deteriorates by 7.61%. By incorporating the productivity of physicians in the scheduling process, we see a reduction in EDs overcrowding and an improvement in the overall quality of health-care services.</p>","PeriodicalId":44699,"journal":{"name":"Health Systems","volume":"10 2","pages":"104-117"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20476965.2019.1666036","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Productivity-driven physician scheduling in emergency departments.\",\"authors\":\"Fanny Camiat,&nbsp;Marìa I Restrepo,&nbsp;Jean-Marc Chauny,&nbsp;Nadia Lahrichi,&nbsp;Louis-Martin Rousseau\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20476965.2019.1666036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The objective of this study is two-fold: to propose an alternative approach for computing the productivity of physicians in emergency departments (EDs); and, to allocate productivity-driven schedules to ED physicians so as to align physician productivity with demand (patient arrivals), without decreasing fairness between physicians, in order to improve patient wait times. Historical data between 2008 and 2017 from the Sacré-Coeur Montreal Hospital ED is analysed and used to predict the demand and to estimate the productivity of each physician. These estimates are incorporated into a mathematical programming model that identifies feasible schedules to physicians that minimise the difference between patients' demand and physicians' productivity, along with the violation of physicians' preferences and fairness in the distribution of shifts. Results on real-world-based data show that when physician productivity is included in the allocation of schedules, demand under-covering is reduced by 10.85% and the fairness between physicians is maintained. However, physicians' preferences (e.g., sum of the differences between the number of wanted shifts and the number of allocated shifts) deteriorates by 7.61%. By incorporating the productivity of physicians in the scheduling process, we see a reduction in EDs overcrowding and an improvement in the overall quality of health-care services.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44699,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Systems\",\"volume\":\"10 2\",\"pages\":\"104-117\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20476965.2019.1666036\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20476965.2019.1666036\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20476965.2019.1666036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

本研究的目的有两个:提出一种计算急诊科医生生产力的替代方法;为急诊科医生分配以生产力为导向的时间表,使医生的生产力与需求(病人到达)保持一致,同时不降低医生之间的公平性,以改善病人的等待时间。对2008年至2017年来自sacr - coeur蒙特利尔医院ED的历史数据进行分析,并用于预测需求和估计每位医生的生产力。这些估计被纳入一个数学规划模型,该模型为医生确定可行的时间表,以最大限度地减少患者需求和医生生产力之间的差异,以及违反医生的偏好和轮班分配的公平性。基于现实世界数据的结果表明,当医生的工作效率被纳入时间表分配时,需求覆盖减少了10.85%,并且保持了医生之间的公平性。然而,医生的偏好(例如,所需轮班数与已分配轮班数之间的差值之和)下降了7.61%。通过将医生的生产力纳入日程安排过程,我们看到急诊科人满为患的情况有所减少,保健服务的整体质量有所提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Productivity-driven physician scheduling in emergency departments.

The objective of this study is two-fold: to propose an alternative approach for computing the productivity of physicians in emergency departments (EDs); and, to allocate productivity-driven schedules to ED physicians so as to align physician productivity with demand (patient arrivals), without decreasing fairness between physicians, in order to improve patient wait times. Historical data between 2008 and 2017 from the Sacré-Coeur Montreal Hospital ED is analysed and used to predict the demand and to estimate the productivity of each physician. These estimates are incorporated into a mathematical programming model that identifies feasible schedules to physicians that minimise the difference between patients' demand and physicians' productivity, along with the violation of physicians' preferences and fairness in the distribution of shifts. Results on real-world-based data show that when physician productivity is included in the allocation of schedules, demand under-covering is reduced by 10.85% and the fairness between physicians is maintained. However, physicians' preferences (e.g., sum of the differences between the number of wanted shifts and the number of allocated shifts) deteriorates by 7.61%. By incorporating the productivity of physicians in the scheduling process, we see a reduction in EDs overcrowding and an improvement in the overall quality of health-care services.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Systems
Health Systems HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
Towards new frontiers of healthcare systems research using artificial intelligence and generative AI. Assistance systems for patient positioning in radiotherapy practice. Resilience of hospitals in an age of disruptions: a systematic literature review on resources and capabilities. From digital health to learning health systems: four approaches to using data for digital health design. Using participatory systems approaches to improve healthcare delivery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1