揭示在NHS转诊治疗的动态。

IF 1.2 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Health Systems Pub Date : 2019-12-11 DOI:10.1080/20476965.2019.1700764
Richard M Wood
{"title":"揭示在NHS转诊治疗的动态。","authors":"Richard M Wood","doi":"10.1080/20476965.2019.1700764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite being the principal measure of elective performance in Great Britain's National Health Service, there is little on-the-ground awareness of the dynamics at play behind the referral-to-treatment (RTT) standard. Through a simple worked analogy, it is shown how this performance measure - calculated as the proportion of unresolved RTT pathways within 18 weeks from referral - is dependent on the interplay between elective demand and capacity. Bringing in activity (cost) and waiting list size, the presented theory unifies the five key components of the pathway dynamics for the first time within the published literature. A computer simulation model based on these principles is thereafter constructed as part of a more quantitative analysis using publicly available national data for 2017-2018. In this, referral rates and capacity are varied in line with a range of \"what if\" scenarios known to be of interest to service planners, with the effect on performance and cost objectively assessed.</p>","PeriodicalId":44699,"journal":{"name":"Health Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20476965.2019.1700764","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unravelling the dynamics of referral-to-treatment in the NHS.\",\"authors\":\"Richard M Wood\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20476965.2019.1700764\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Despite being the principal measure of elective performance in Great Britain's National Health Service, there is little on-the-ground awareness of the dynamics at play behind the referral-to-treatment (RTT) standard. Through a simple worked analogy, it is shown how this performance measure - calculated as the proportion of unresolved RTT pathways within 18 weeks from referral - is dependent on the interplay between elective demand and capacity. Bringing in activity (cost) and waiting list size, the presented theory unifies the five key components of the pathway dynamics for the first time within the published literature. A computer simulation model based on these principles is thereafter constructed as part of a more quantitative analysis using publicly available national data for 2017-2018. In this, referral rates and capacity are varied in line with a range of \\\"what if\\\" scenarios known to be of interest to service planners, with the effect on performance and cost objectively assessed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44699,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Systems\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20476965.2019.1700764\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20476965.2019.1700764\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20476965.2019.1700764","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

尽管RTT是衡量英国国民健康服务(National Health Service)选择性表现的主要标准,但人们对RTT标准背后的动态机制知之甚少。通过一个简单的工作类比,显示了这种绩效衡量——以转诊后18周内未解决的RTT路径的比例计算——是如何依赖于可选需求和能力之间的相互作用的。引入活动(成本)和等候名单大小,本文提出的理论在已发表的文献中首次统一了路径动力学的五个关键组成部分。随后,基于这些原则构建了计算机模拟模型,作为使用2017-2018年公开国家数据进行更定量分析的一部分。在这方面,转诊率和能力根据服务规划人员感兴趣的一系列“假设”情况而变化,并客观地评估对业绩和成本的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Unravelling the dynamics of referral-to-treatment in the NHS.

Despite being the principal measure of elective performance in Great Britain's National Health Service, there is little on-the-ground awareness of the dynamics at play behind the referral-to-treatment (RTT) standard. Through a simple worked analogy, it is shown how this performance measure - calculated as the proportion of unresolved RTT pathways within 18 weeks from referral - is dependent on the interplay between elective demand and capacity. Bringing in activity (cost) and waiting list size, the presented theory unifies the five key components of the pathway dynamics for the first time within the published literature. A computer simulation model based on these principles is thereafter constructed as part of a more quantitative analysis using publicly available national data for 2017-2018. In this, referral rates and capacity are varied in line with a range of "what if" scenarios known to be of interest to service planners, with the effect on performance and cost objectively assessed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Systems
Health Systems HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
Resilience of hospitals in an age of disruptions: a systematic literature review on resources and capabilities. Managing disrupted supply chains in Swedish hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic A simple and practical approach to improving the cost effectiveness of surgical inventory management A systematic review of simulation methods applied to cancer care services Impact of quality of service in the direct cost of integrated home care services
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1