{"title":"大麻在PTSD治疗中的应用:系统综述。","authors":"Yasir Rehman, Amreen Saini, Sarina Huang, Emma Sood, Ravneet Gill, Sezgi Yanikomeroglu","doi":"10.3934/Neuroscience.2021022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Existing reviews exploring cannabis effectiveness have numerous limitations including narrow search strategies. We systematically explored cannabis effects on PTSD symptoms, quality of life (QOL), and return to work (RTW). We also investigated harm outcomes such as adverse effects and dropouts due to adverse effects, inefficacy, and all-cause dropout rates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycInfo, CINAHL, Web of Science, CENTRAL, and PubMed databases, yielded 1 eligible RCT and 10 observational studies (n = 4672). Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed with the Cochrane risk of bias tool and ROBINS-I.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Evidence from the included studies was mainly based on non-randomized studies with no comparators. Results from unpooled, high RoB studies showed that cannabis was associated with a reduction in overall PTSD symptoms and improved QOL. Dry mouth, headaches, and psychoactive effects such as agitation and euphoria were the commonly reported adverse effects. In most studies, cannabis was well tolerated, but small proportions of patients experienced a worsening of PTSD symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Evidence in the current study primarily stems from low quality and high RoB observational studies. Further RCTs investigating cannabis effects on PTSD treatment should be conducted with larger sample sizes and explore a broader range of patient-important outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":7732,"journal":{"name":"AIMS Neuroscience","volume":"8 3","pages":"414-434"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8222769/pdf/","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cannabis in the management of PTSD: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Yasir Rehman, Amreen Saini, Sarina Huang, Emma Sood, Ravneet Gill, Sezgi Yanikomeroglu\",\"doi\":\"10.3934/Neuroscience.2021022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Existing reviews exploring cannabis effectiveness have numerous limitations including narrow search strategies. We systematically explored cannabis effects on PTSD symptoms, quality of life (QOL), and return to work (RTW). We also investigated harm outcomes such as adverse effects and dropouts due to adverse effects, inefficacy, and all-cause dropout rates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycInfo, CINAHL, Web of Science, CENTRAL, and PubMed databases, yielded 1 eligible RCT and 10 observational studies (n = 4672). Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed with the Cochrane risk of bias tool and ROBINS-I.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Evidence from the included studies was mainly based on non-randomized studies with no comparators. Results from unpooled, high RoB studies showed that cannabis was associated with a reduction in overall PTSD symptoms and improved QOL. Dry mouth, headaches, and psychoactive effects such as agitation and euphoria were the commonly reported adverse effects. In most studies, cannabis was well tolerated, but small proportions of patients experienced a worsening of PTSD symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Evidence in the current study primarily stems from low quality and high RoB observational studies. Further RCTs investigating cannabis effects on PTSD treatment should be conducted with larger sample sizes and explore a broader range of patient-important outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AIMS Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"8 3\",\"pages\":\"414-434\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8222769/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AIMS Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3934/Neuroscience.2021022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIMS Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3934/Neuroscience.2021022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14
摘要
现有的评论探索大麻的有效性有许多局限性,包括狭窄的搜索策略。我们系统地探讨了大麻对PTSD症状、生活质量(QOL)和重返工作(RTW)的影响。我们还调查了危害结果,如不良反应和因不良反应而退学、无效和全因退学率。方法:我们在MEDLINE、EMBASE、PsycInfo、CINAHL、Web of Science、CENTRAL和PubMed数据库中检索,获得1项符合条件的RCT和10项观察性研究(n = 4672)。采用Cochrane偏倚风险工具和ROBINS-I评估偏倚风险(RoB)。结果:纳入研究的证据主要基于没有比较物的非随机研究。非汇总的高RoB研究结果表明,大麻与总体创伤后应激障碍症状的减少和生活质量的改善有关。口干舌燥、头痛和精神反应,如躁动和兴奋是常见的不良反应。在大多数研究中,大麻耐受性良好,但一小部分患者经历了PTSD症状的恶化。结论:目前研究中的证据主要来自低质量和高RoB的观察性研究。进一步研究大麻对创伤后应激障碍治疗效果的随机对照试验应该以更大的样本量进行,并探索更广泛的对患者重要的结果。
Cannabis in the management of PTSD: a systematic review.
Introduction: Existing reviews exploring cannabis effectiveness have numerous limitations including narrow search strategies. We systematically explored cannabis effects on PTSD symptoms, quality of life (QOL), and return to work (RTW). We also investigated harm outcomes such as adverse effects and dropouts due to adverse effects, inefficacy, and all-cause dropout rates.
Methods: Our search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycInfo, CINAHL, Web of Science, CENTRAL, and PubMed databases, yielded 1 eligible RCT and 10 observational studies (n = 4672). Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed with the Cochrane risk of bias tool and ROBINS-I.
Results: Evidence from the included studies was mainly based on non-randomized studies with no comparators. Results from unpooled, high RoB studies showed that cannabis was associated with a reduction in overall PTSD symptoms and improved QOL. Dry mouth, headaches, and psychoactive effects such as agitation and euphoria were the commonly reported adverse effects. In most studies, cannabis was well tolerated, but small proportions of patients experienced a worsening of PTSD symptoms.
Conclusion: Evidence in the current study primarily stems from low quality and high RoB observational studies. Further RCTs investigating cannabis effects on PTSD treatment should be conducted with larger sample sizes and explore a broader range of patient-important outcomes.
期刊介绍:
AIMS Neuroscience is an international Open Access journal devoted to publishing peer-reviewed, high quality, original papers from all areas in the field of neuroscience. The primary focus is to provide a forum in which to expedite the speed with which theoretical neuroscience progresses toward generating testable hypotheses. In the presence of current and developing technology that offers unprecedented access to functions of the nervous system at all levels, the journal is designed to serve the role of providing the widest variety of the best theoretical views leading to suggested studies. Single blind peer review is provided for all articles and commentaries.