调整泰国版本的阿登布鲁克认知考试III教育筛查痴呆症。

IF 3.4 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurodegenerative disease management Pub Date : 2021-08-01 Epub Date: 2021-07-07 DOI:10.2217/nmt-2021-0001
Thammanard Charernboon
{"title":"调整泰国版本的阿登布鲁克认知考试III教育筛查痴呆症。","authors":"Thammanard Charernboon","doi":"10.2217/nmt-2021-0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> To examine whether education adjusted cut-off points of the Thai version of the ACE-III improve diagnostic accuracy in the detection of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia. <b>Materials & methods:</b> There were 172 participants consisting of 70 normal controls, 49 people with MCI and 53 patients with dementia. <b>Results:</b> To screen for MCI, the adjusted for education method yielded greater accuracy for the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AuROC) than the unadjusted method (0.9-0.92 vs 0.86). For the detection of dementia, when applying the education correction, AuROC increased from 0.87 (unadjusted) to 0.91 for the education >6 group, but there was no improvement for education ≤6 group (AuROC 0.86). <b>Conclusion:</b> The use of adjusted cut-off score for education level could increase the diagnostic accuracy of the test.</p>","PeriodicalId":19114,"journal":{"name":"Neurodegenerative disease management","volume":"11 4","pages":"299-305"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adjusting the Thai version of the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination III for education to screen for dementia.\",\"authors\":\"Thammanard Charernboon\",\"doi\":\"10.2217/nmt-2021-0001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> To examine whether education adjusted cut-off points of the Thai version of the ACE-III improve diagnostic accuracy in the detection of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia. <b>Materials & methods:</b> There were 172 participants consisting of 70 normal controls, 49 people with MCI and 53 patients with dementia. <b>Results:</b> To screen for MCI, the adjusted for education method yielded greater accuracy for the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AuROC) than the unadjusted method (0.9-0.92 vs 0.86). For the detection of dementia, when applying the education correction, AuROC increased from 0.87 (unadjusted) to 0.91 for the education >6 group, but there was no improvement for education ≤6 group (AuROC 0.86). <b>Conclusion:</b> The use of adjusted cut-off score for education level could increase the diagnostic accuracy of the test.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19114,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurodegenerative disease management\",\"volume\":\"11 4\",\"pages\":\"299-305\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurodegenerative disease management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2217/nmt-2021-0001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/7/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurodegenerative disease management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2217/nmt-2021-0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/7/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨泰国版ACE-III的教育调整截断点是否能提高轻度认知障碍(MCI)和痴呆的诊断准确性。材料与方法:172名参与者,其中70名正常对照,49名轻度认知障碍患者和53名痴呆患者。结果:为了筛查MCI,调整教育方法的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AuROC)比未调整方法的准确度更高(0.9-0.92 vs 0.86)。对于痴呆的检测,应用教育矫正时,教育程度>6组的AuROC从0.87(未经调整)增加到0.91,而教育程度≤6组的AuROC无改善(AuROC为0.86)。结论:教育程度调整分界点可提高该测试的诊断准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Adjusting the Thai version of the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination III for education to screen for dementia.

Aim: To examine whether education adjusted cut-off points of the Thai version of the ACE-III improve diagnostic accuracy in the detection of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia. Materials & methods: There were 172 participants consisting of 70 normal controls, 49 people with MCI and 53 patients with dementia. Results: To screen for MCI, the adjusted for education method yielded greater accuracy for the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AuROC) than the unadjusted method (0.9-0.92 vs 0.86). For the detection of dementia, when applying the education correction, AuROC increased from 0.87 (unadjusted) to 0.91 for the education >6 group, but there was no improvement for education ≤6 group (AuROC 0.86). Conclusion: The use of adjusted cut-off score for education level could increase the diagnostic accuracy of the test.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊最新文献
Registered Dietitians' perspectives on nutrition management of persons living with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Plasma proteomic trajectories before the onset of neurodegenerative diseases. Burden of Parkinson's disease from 1990 to 2021 at the global, regional, and national level, with forecasts to 2035. The multifaceted nature of Friedreich ataxia: strategies for comprehensive patient care. Multivariate analysis of sex differences in Parkinson's disease: the distinct contributions of fall-related self-efficacy and voice handicap.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1