遗忘性轻度认知障碍患者的错误记忆和阿尔茨海默病病理:淀粉样蛋白PET研究

IF 1.4 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra Pub Date : 2021-06-11 eCollection Date: 2021-05-01 DOI:10.1159/000516230
Eun-Ji Choi, Bum Joon Kim, Hyung-Ji Kim, Miseon Kwon, Noh Eul Han, Sun-Mi Lee, Sungyang Jo, Sunju Lee, Jae-Hong Lee
{"title":"遗忘性轻度认知障碍患者的错误记忆和阿尔茨海默病病理:淀粉样蛋白PET研究","authors":"Eun-Ji Choi,&nbsp;Bum Joon Kim,&nbsp;Hyung-Ji Kim,&nbsp;Miseon Kwon,&nbsp;Noh Eul Han,&nbsp;Sun-Mi Lee,&nbsp;Sungyang Jo,&nbsp;Sunju Lee,&nbsp;Jae-Hong Lee","doi":"10.1159/000516230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>False memory, observed as intrusion errors or false positives (FPs), is prevalent in patients with Alzheimer's disease, but has yet to be thoroughly investigated in patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (a-MCI) with Alzheimer's disease pathology (ADP). We analyzed false versus veridical memory in individuals with a-MCI and measured the utility of false memory for ADP discrimination.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with a-MCI who received neuropsychological testing and amyloid PET were included. Patients were categorized into \"with\" and \"without ADP\" groups according to PET results. Memory tests assessed veridical and false memory, and the verity of patient responses was analyzed. A logistic regression model was used to evaluate false memory efficiency in discriminating ADP, and the sensitivity and specificity at the optimal level were estimated using the receiver-operating characteristic curve.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-seven ADP and 46 non-ADP patients were enrolled. The ADP group made more FPs in the recognition tests, and their response verity was significantly lower in every delayed memory test. No group difference, however, was observed in the veridical memory. The logistic regression analysis demonstrated that as the FPs increased, the risk of ADP increased 1.31 and 1.36 times in the verbal and visual recognition tests, respectively. The discriminatory accuracy of the FPs was estimated \"low\" to \"moderate\" in the visual and verbal recognition, respectively, with an optimal cutoff above 2.5.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Increased false memory was the only feature to discriminate ADP from non-ADP in individuals with a-MCI. Further studies regarding false memory and its mechanism are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":38017,"journal":{"name":"Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000516230","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"False Memory and Alzheimer's Disease Pathology in Patients with Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Study with Amyloid PET.\",\"authors\":\"Eun-Ji Choi,&nbsp;Bum Joon Kim,&nbsp;Hyung-Ji Kim,&nbsp;Miseon Kwon,&nbsp;Noh Eul Han,&nbsp;Sun-Mi Lee,&nbsp;Sungyang Jo,&nbsp;Sunju Lee,&nbsp;Jae-Hong Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000516230\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>False memory, observed as intrusion errors or false positives (FPs), is prevalent in patients with Alzheimer's disease, but has yet to be thoroughly investigated in patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (a-MCI) with Alzheimer's disease pathology (ADP). We analyzed false versus veridical memory in individuals with a-MCI and measured the utility of false memory for ADP discrimination.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with a-MCI who received neuropsychological testing and amyloid PET were included. Patients were categorized into \\\"with\\\" and \\\"without ADP\\\" groups according to PET results. Memory tests assessed veridical and false memory, and the verity of patient responses was analyzed. A logistic regression model was used to evaluate false memory efficiency in discriminating ADP, and the sensitivity and specificity at the optimal level were estimated using the receiver-operating characteristic curve.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-seven ADP and 46 non-ADP patients were enrolled. The ADP group made more FPs in the recognition tests, and their response verity was significantly lower in every delayed memory test. No group difference, however, was observed in the veridical memory. The logistic regression analysis demonstrated that as the FPs increased, the risk of ADP increased 1.31 and 1.36 times in the verbal and visual recognition tests, respectively. The discriminatory accuracy of the FPs was estimated \\\"low\\\" to \\\"moderate\\\" in the visual and verbal recognition, respectively, with an optimal cutoff above 2.5.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Increased false memory was the only feature to discriminate ADP from non-ADP in individuals with a-MCI. Further studies regarding false memory and its mechanism are warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38017,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000516230\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000516230\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/5/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000516230","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

虚假记忆,被观察为侵入错误或假阳性(FPs),在阿尔茨海默病患者中很普遍,但尚未对伴有阿尔茨海默病病理(ADP)的遗忘性轻度认知障碍(a-MCI)患者进行彻底调查。我们分析了a-MCI患者的错误记忆和真实记忆,并测量了错误记忆对ADP辨别的效用。方法:接受神经心理测试和淀粉样蛋白PET检查的a-MCI患者。根据PET结果将患者分为有ADP组和无ADP组。记忆测试评估真实记忆和错误记忆,并分析患者反应的真实性。采用logistic回归模型评价错误记忆在识别ADP中的效率,并利用受体-工作特征曲线估计最佳水平下的敏感性和特异性。结果:纳入37例ADP患者和46例非ADP患者。ADP组在识别测试中做出了更多的FPs,并且在每个延迟记忆测试中他们的反应真实性显著降低。然而,在真实记忆方面没有观察到组间差异。logistic回归分析显示,随着FPs的增加,言语和视觉识别测试中ADP的风险分别增加1.31倍和1.36倍。在视觉和言语识别中,FPs的区分准确度分别为“低”到“中等”,最佳截断值高于2.5。结论:错误记忆的增加是a-MCI患者区分ADP与非ADP的唯一特征。对错误记忆及其机制的进一步研究是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
False Memory and Alzheimer's Disease Pathology in Patients with Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Study with Amyloid PET.

Introduction: False memory, observed as intrusion errors or false positives (FPs), is prevalent in patients with Alzheimer's disease, but has yet to be thoroughly investigated in patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (a-MCI) with Alzheimer's disease pathology (ADP). We analyzed false versus veridical memory in individuals with a-MCI and measured the utility of false memory for ADP discrimination.

Methods: Patients with a-MCI who received neuropsychological testing and amyloid PET were included. Patients were categorized into "with" and "without ADP" groups according to PET results. Memory tests assessed veridical and false memory, and the verity of patient responses was analyzed. A logistic regression model was used to evaluate false memory efficiency in discriminating ADP, and the sensitivity and specificity at the optimal level were estimated using the receiver-operating characteristic curve.

Results: Thirty-seven ADP and 46 non-ADP patients were enrolled. The ADP group made more FPs in the recognition tests, and their response verity was significantly lower in every delayed memory test. No group difference, however, was observed in the veridical memory. The logistic regression analysis demonstrated that as the FPs increased, the risk of ADP increased 1.31 and 1.36 times in the verbal and visual recognition tests, respectively. The discriminatory accuracy of the FPs was estimated "low" to "moderate" in the visual and verbal recognition, respectively, with an optimal cutoff above 2.5.

Conclusion: Increased false memory was the only feature to discriminate ADP from non-ADP in individuals with a-MCI. Further studies regarding false memory and its mechanism are warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra
Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: This open access and online-only journal publishes original articles covering the entire spectrum of cognitive dysfunction such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease, Huntington’s chorea and other neurodegenerative diseases. The journal draws from diverse related research disciplines such as psychogeriatrics, neuropsychology, clinical neurology, morphology, physiology, genetic molecular biology, pathology, biochemistry, immunology, pharmacology and pharmaceutics. Strong emphasis is placed on the publication of research findings from animal studies which are complemented by clinical and therapeutic experience to give an overall appreciation of the field. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra provides additional contents based on reviewed and accepted submissions to the main journal Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra .
期刊最新文献
Fear of Dementia among Middle-Aged and Older Adults in Germany. Characteristics of Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment Influenced by the Time of Onset. Prevalence of Geriatric Syndromes among Older Outpatients with Dementia. Criterion-Related Validity of the Cognitive Function Score with the Revised Hasegawa's Dementia Scale and the Bedriddenness Rank with the Barthel Index and the Katz Index: A Multi-Center Retrospective Study. What’s new in dementia risk prediction modelling? An updated systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1