Anders Vesterberg, Rudy Rizkalla, Mark J Fitzpatrick
{"title":"环境对果蝇产卵决定的影响。","authors":"Anders Vesterberg, Rudy Rizkalla, Mark J Fitzpatrick","doi":"10.1080/01677063.2021.1950713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Deciding whether or not to lay an egg on a given substrate is an important task undertaken by females of many arthropods. It involves perceiving the environment (e.g. quality of the substrate, temperature, and humidity), formulating a decision, and then conducting the appropriate behaviours to oviposit. This oviposition site selection (OSS) provides a useful system for studying simple decision-making. OSS in fruit flies, <i>Drosophila melanogaster</i>, is influenced by both genetic and environmental variation. Naturally occurring allelic variation in the <i>foraging</i> gene (<i>for</i>) is known to affect OSS. Given a choice of high- and low-nutrient oviposition substrates, groups of rovers (<i>for</i><sup>R</sup>) are known to lay significantly more of their eggs on low-nutrient sites than sitters (<i>for</i><sup>s</sup>) and sitter mutants (<i>for</i><sup>s2</sup>). Here we ask three questions: (1) Is the role of <i>for</i> in OSS affected by the availability of alternate oviposition sites? (2) Is the role of <i>for</i> in OSS sensitive to the density of ovipositing females? and (3) Does the gustatory sensation of yeast play a role in <i>for</i>-mediated variation in OSS? We find a role of choice and female density in rover/sitter differences in OSS, as well as a role of <i>for</i> in response to glycerol, an indicator of yeast. The role of <i>for</i> in OSS decision-making is complex and multi-faceted and should prove fertile ground for further research into the factors affecting decision-making behaviours.</p>","PeriodicalId":16491,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurogenetics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01677063.2021.1950713","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Environmental influences on <i>for</i>-mediated oviposition decisions in <i>Drosophila melanogaster</i>.\",\"authors\":\"Anders Vesterberg, Rudy Rizkalla, Mark J Fitzpatrick\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01677063.2021.1950713\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Deciding whether or not to lay an egg on a given substrate is an important task undertaken by females of many arthropods. It involves perceiving the environment (e.g. quality of the substrate, temperature, and humidity), formulating a decision, and then conducting the appropriate behaviours to oviposit. This oviposition site selection (OSS) provides a useful system for studying simple decision-making. OSS in fruit flies, <i>Drosophila melanogaster</i>, is influenced by both genetic and environmental variation. Naturally occurring allelic variation in the <i>foraging</i> gene (<i>for</i>) is known to affect OSS. Given a choice of high- and low-nutrient oviposition substrates, groups of rovers (<i>for</i><sup>R</sup>) are known to lay significantly more of their eggs on low-nutrient sites than sitters (<i>for</i><sup>s</sup>) and sitter mutants (<i>for</i><sup>s2</sup>). Here we ask three questions: (1) Is the role of <i>for</i> in OSS affected by the availability of alternate oviposition sites? (2) Is the role of <i>for</i> in OSS sensitive to the density of ovipositing females? and (3) Does the gustatory sensation of yeast play a role in <i>for</i>-mediated variation in OSS? We find a role of choice and female density in rover/sitter differences in OSS, as well as a role of <i>for</i> in response to glycerol, an indicator of yeast. The role of <i>for</i> in OSS decision-making is complex and multi-faceted and should prove fertile ground for further research into the factors affecting decision-making behaviours.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16491,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurogenetics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01677063.2021.1950713\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurogenetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01677063.2021.1950713\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/7/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurogenetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01677063.2021.1950713","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/7/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Environmental influences on for-mediated oviposition decisions in Drosophila melanogaster.
Deciding whether or not to lay an egg on a given substrate is an important task undertaken by females of many arthropods. It involves perceiving the environment (e.g. quality of the substrate, temperature, and humidity), formulating a decision, and then conducting the appropriate behaviours to oviposit. This oviposition site selection (OSS) provides a useful system for studying simple decision-making. OSS in fruit flies, Drosophila melanogaster, is influenced by both genetic and environmental variation. Naturally occurring allelic variation in the foraging gene (for) is known to affect OSS. Given a choice of high- and low-nutrient oviposition substrates, groups of rovers (forR) are known to lay significantly more of their eggs on low-nutrient sites than sitters (fors) and sitter mutants (fors2). Here we ask three questions: (1) Is the role of for in OSS affected by the availability of alternate oviposition sites? (2) Is the role of for in OSS sensitive to the density of ovipositing females? and (3) Does the gustatory sensation of yeast play a role in for-mediated variation in OSS? We find a role of choice and female density in rover/sitter differences in OSS, as well as a role of for in response to glycerol, an indicator of yeast. The role of for in OSS decision-making is complex and multi-faceted and should prove fertile ground for further research into the factors affecting decision-making behaviours.
期刊介绍:
The Journal is appropriate for papers on behavioral, biochemical, or cellular aspects of neural function, plasticity, aging or disease. In addition to analyses in the traditional genetic-model organisms, C. elegans, Drosophila, mouse and the zebrafish, the Journal encourages submission of neurogenetic investigations performed in organisms not easily amenable to experimental genetics. Such investigations might, for instance, describe behavioral differences deriving from genetic variation within a species, or report human disease studies that provide exceptional insights into biological mechanisms