“夏威夷”和“耐药”:菲律宾当地卫生知识和COVID-19大流行。

IF 1.5 4区 社会学 Q2 ANTHROPOLOGY Anthropology & Medicine Pub Date : 2021-12-01 Epub Date: 2021-07-19 DOI:10.1080/13648470.2021.1893980
Michael Lim Tan, Gideon Lasco
{"title":"“夏威夷”和“耐药”:菲律宾当地卫生知识和COVID-19大流行。","authors":"Michael Lim Tan,&nbsp;Gideon Lasco","doi":"10.1080/13648470.2021.1893980","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Understanding people’s concepts of illness and health is key to crafting policies and communications campaigns to address a particular medical concern. This paper gathers cultural knowledge on infectious disease causation, prevention, and treatment the Philippines that are particularly relevant for the COVID-19 pandemic, and analyzes their implications for public health. This paper draws from ethnographic work (e.g. participant observation, interviews, conversations, virtual ethnography) carried out individually by each of the two authors from February to September 2020. The data was analyzed in relation to the anthropological literature on local health knowledge in the Philippines. We find that notions of hawa (contagion) and resistensiya (immunity) inform people’s views of illness causation as well as their preventive practices - including the use of face masks and ‘vitamins’ and other pharmaceuticals, as well as the ways in which they negotiate prescriptions of face mask use and physical distancing. These perceptions and practices go beyond biomedical knowledge and are continuously being shaped by people’s everyday experiences and circulations of knowledge in traditional and social media. Our study reveals that people’s novel practices reflect recurrent, familiar, and long-held concepts - such as the moral undertones of hawa and experimentation inherent in resistensiya. Policies and communications efforts should acknowledge and anticipate how these notions may serve as either barriers or facilitators to participatory care and improved health outcomes.","PeriodicalId":8240,"journal":{"name":"Anthropology & Medicine","volume":"28 4","pages":"576-591"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13648470.2021.1893980","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"'<i>Hawa</i>' and '<i>resistensiya</i>': local health knowledge and the COVID-19 pandemic in the Philippines.\",\"authors\":\"Michael Lim Tan,&nbsp;Gideon Lasco\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13648470.2021.1893980\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Understanding people’s concepts of illness and health is key to crafting policies and communications campaigns to address a particular medical concern. This paper gathers cultural knowledge on infectious disease causation, prevention, and treatment the Philippines that are particularly relevant for the COVID-19 pandemic, and analyzes their implications for public health. This paper draws from ethnographic work (e.g. participant observation, interviews, conversations, virtual ethnography) carried out individually by each of the two authors from February to September 2020. The data was analyzed in relation to the anthropological literature on local health knowledge in the Philippines. We find that notions of hawa (contagion) and resistensiya (immunity) inform people’s views of illness causation as well as their preventive practices - including the use of face masks and ‘vitamins’ and other pharmaceuticals, as well as the ways in which they negotiate prescriptions of face mask use and physical distancing. These perceptions and practices go beyond biomedical knowledge and are continuously being shaped by people’s everyday experiences and circulations of knowledge in traditional and social media. Our study reveals that people’s novel practices reflect recurrent, familiar, and long-held concepts - such as the moral undertones of hawa and experimentation inherent in resistensiya. Policies and communications efforts should acknowledge and anticipate how these notions may serve as either barriers or facilitators to participatory care and improved health outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anthropology & Medicine\",\"volume\":\"28 4\",\"pages\":\"576-591\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13648470.2021.1893980\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anthropology & Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13648470.2021.1893980\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/7/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropology & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13648470.2021.1893980","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/7/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

了解人们对疾病和健康的概念是制定政策和宣传运动以解决特定医疗问题的关键。本文收集了与COVID-19大流行特别相关的菲律宾传染病病因、预防和治疗的文化知识,并分析了它们对公共卫生的影响。本文借鉴了两位作者在2020年2月至9月期间分别进行的民族志工作(如参与性观察、访谈、对话、虚拟民族志)。将这些数据与有关菲律宾当地卫生知识的人类学文献进行了分析。我们发现,hawa(传染)和抵抗力(免疫)的概念影响了人们对病因的看法以及他们的预防措施——包括使用口罩、“维生素”和其他药物,以及他们就使用口罩和保持身体距离的处方进行谈判的方式。这些观念和做法超出了生物医学知识的范畴,并不断受到人们的日常经验以及传统和社交媒体上的知识传播的影响。我们的研究表明,人们的新奇行为反映了反复出现的、熟悉的、长期持有的概念——比如抵抗中固有的道德内涵和实验。政策和宣传工作应承认并预测这些概念如何成为参与性护理和改善健康结果的障碍或促进因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
'Hawa' and 'resistensiya': local health knowledge and the COVID-19 pandemic in the Philippines.
Abstract Understanding people’s concepts of illness and health is key to crafting policies and communications campaigns to address a particular medical concern. This paper gathers cultural knowledge on infectious disease causation, prevention, and treatment the Philippines that are particularly relevant for the COVID-19 pandemic, and analyzes their implications for public health. This paper draws from ethnographic work (e.g. participant observation, interviews, conversations, virtual ethnography) carried out individually by each of the two authors from February to September 2020. The data was analyzed in relation to the anthropological literature on local health knowledge in the Philippines. We find that notions of hawa (contagion) and resistensiya (immunity) inform people’s views of illness causation as well as their preventive practices - including the use of face masks and ‘vitamins’ and other pharmaceuticals, as well as the ways in which they negotiate prescriptions of face mask use and physical distancing. These perceptions and practices go beyond biomedical knowledge and are continuously being shaped by people’s everyday experiences and circulations of knowledge in traditional and social media. Our study reveals that people’s novel practices reflect recurrent, familiar, and long-held concepts - such as the moral undertones of hawa and experimentation inherent in resistensiya. Policies and communications efforts should acknowledge and anticipate how these notions may serve as either barriers or facilitators to participatory care and improved health outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
(In) visibility of health and illness: Instagram as an unregulated public health platform. 'We are not done': reclaiming care after mobile health in Burkina Faso. Digital technologies and the future of health: aspirations, care and data. Phantom data and the potentials of radical caretaking in reproductive health. The insensitivity of 'sensitive care': the bureaucracy of pregnancy tissue disposal in England, UK.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1