转移性黑色素瘤患者伊匹单抗再挑战的回顾性分析。

IF 1.2 Q3 DERMATOLOGY Journal of Skin Cancer Pub Date : 2021-07-05 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2021/5531864
A A Formozo, J R Gomes, R A Schmerling, A C Buzaid
{"title":"转移性黑色素瘤患者伊匹单抗再挑战的回顾性分析。","authors":"A A Formozo,&nbsp;J R Gomes,&nbsp;R A Schmerling,&nbsp;A C Buzaid","doi":"10.1155/2021/5531864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Checkpoint inhibitors are effective in the treatment of several types of cancer, either being used separately or in combination. Ipilimumab pioneered the treatment of metastatic melanoma, and nowadays, it has been used more frequently in combination with anti-PD-1. Since the development of anti-PD1 for melanoma, rechallenge with ipilimumab has not been considered, although its use was considered in early trials.</p><p><strong>Cases: </strong>In this study, we analyzed 22 patients with metastatic melanoma who had benefited from the first treatment with ipilimumab, but eventually had progressive disease. They received ipilimumab at the same dose as the first treatment. Most of the patients received the second course after six months or more from the first treatment with ipilimumab. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) of the treatment with ipilimumab was 8.9 months, and the median progression-free survival of the second course was 6.3 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There are limited data on rechallenge with ipilimumab addressing progression-free survival (PFS). In our analysis, twenty-two patients treated with a second course of ipilimumab were analyzed and most of them had a significant benefit. Despite the current alternatives for salvage therapies, rechallenging with ipilimumab might be an alternative to be considered in patients who had initial benefit.</p>","PeriodicalId":17172,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Skin Cancer","volume":"2021 ","pages":"5531864"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8275418/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retrospective Analysis of Rechallenge with Ipilimumab in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma.\",\"authors\":\"A A Formozo,&nbsp;J R Gomes,&nbsp;R A Schmerling,&nbsp;A C Buzaid\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2021/5531864\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Checkpoint inhibitors are effective in the treatment of several types of cancer, either being used separately or in combination. Ipilimumab pioneered the treatment of metastatic melanoma, and nowadays, it has been used more frequently in combination with anti-PD-1. Since the development of anti-PD1 for melanoma, rechallenge with ipilimumab has not been considered, although its use was considered in early trials.</p><p><strong>Cases: </strong>In this study, we analyzed 22 patients with metastatic melanoma who had benefited from the first treatment with ipilimumab, but eventually had progressive disease. They received ipilimumab at the same dose as the first treatment. Most of the patients received the second course after six months or more from the first treatment with ipilimumab. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) of the treatment with ipilimumab was 8.9 months, and the median progression-free survival of the second course was 6.3 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There are limited data on rechallenge with ipilimumab addressing progression-free survival (PFS). In our analysis, twenty-two patients treated with a second course of ipilimumab were analyzed and most of them had a significant benefit. Despite the current alternatives for salvage therapies, rechallenging with ipilimumab might be an alternative to be considered in patients who had initial benefit.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17172,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Skin Cancer\",\"volume\":\"2021 \",\"pages\":\"5531864\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8275418/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Skin Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5531864\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Skin Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5531864","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:检查点抑制剂在治疗几种类型的癌症中是有效的,无论是单独使用还是联合使用。Ipilimumab是治疗转移性黑色素瘤的先驱,如今,它已经更频繁地与抗pd -1联合使用。自从抗pd1黑色素瘤的开发以来,ipilimumab的再次挑战尚未被考虑,尽管它在早期试验中被考虑使用。病例:在这项研究中,我们分析了22例转移性黑色素瘤患者,他们从伊匹单抗的首次治疗中获益,但最终病情进展。他们接受了与第一次治疗相同剂量的伊匹单抗。大多数患者在伊匹单抗首次治疗6个月或更长时间后接受第二疗程。ipilimumab治疗的中位无进展生存期(mPFS)为8.9个月,第二个疗程的中位无进展生存期为6.3个月。结论:伊匹单抗治疗无进展生存期(PFS)的再挑战数据有限。在我们的分析中,分析了22例接受第二疗程伊匹木单抗治疗的患者,其中大多数患者都有显著的获益。尽管目前有挽救性治疗的替代方案,但对于最初受益的患者,重新使用易普利姆单抗可能是一种可考虑的替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Retrospective Analysis of Rechallenge with Ipilimumab in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma.

Background: Checkpoint inhibitors are effective in the treatment of several types of cancer, either being used separately or in combination. Ipilimumab pioneered the treatment of metastatic melanoma, and nowadays, it has been used more frequently in combination with anti-PD-1. Since the development of anti-PD1 for melanoma, rechallenge with ipilimumab has not been considered, although its use was considered in early trials.

Cases: In this study, we analyzed 22 patients with metastatic melanoma who had benefited from the first treatment with ipilimumab, but eventually had progressive disease. They received ipilimumab at the same dose as the first treatment. Most of the patients received the second course after six months or more from the first treatment with ipilimumab. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) of the treatment with ipilimumab was 8.9 months, and the median progression-free survival of the second course was 6.3 months.

Conclusion: There are limited data on rechallenge with ipilimumab addressing progression-free survival (PFS). In our analysis, twenty-two patients treated with a second course of ipilimumab were analyzed and most of them had a significant benefit. Despite the current alternatives for salvage therapies, rechallenging with ipilimumab might be an alternative to be considered in patients who had initial benefit.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Skin Cancer
Journal of Skin Cancer DERMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
18.20%
发文量
12
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Skin Cancer is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes clinical and translational research on the detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of skin malignancies. The journal encourages the submission of original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to pathology, prognostic indicators and biomarkers, novel therapies, as well as drug sensitivity and resistance.
期刊最新文献
Predicting BRAF Mutations in Cutaneous Melanoma Patients Using Neural Network Analysis. Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer in the Heart of the Middle East: Analysis of Mohs Micrographic Surgery Cases From a Tertiary Care Center in Lebanon. Analysis of the Stockholm Public Health Cohort: Exploring How Ultraviolet Radiation and Other Factors Associate with Skin Cancer. Beyond the Scalpel: Advancing Strategic Approaches and Targeted Therapies in Nonexcisable Melanomas. Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice toward Skin Cancer among Patients of Dermatology Clinics and Medical Students/General Practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1