Irene Jimenez-Perez, Jose Ignacio Priego-Quesada, Andrés Camacho-García, Rosa Mª Cibrián Ortiz de Anda, Pedro Pérez-Soriano
{"title":"使用微波自定制足部矫形器进行长距离跑步时的冲击加速度。","authors":"Irene Jimenez-Perez, Jose Ignacio Priego-Quesada, Andrés Camacho-García, Rosa Mª Cibrián Ortiz de Anda, Pedro Pérez-Soriano","doi":"10.1080/14763141.2021.1902553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The use of custom-made foot orthoses has been associated with numerous benefits, such as decreased impact accelerations. However, it is not known whether this effect could be due to better customisation. The present study analysed the effects of the first generation of a microwavable prefabricated self-customised foot orthosis vs. a prefabricated standard one on impact accelerations throughout a prolonged run. Thirty runners performed two tests of 30-min running on a treadmill, each one with an orthosis condition. Impact acceleration variables of tibia and head were recorded every 5 min. Microwavable self-customised foot orthosis increased the following variables in the first instants compared to the prefabricated standard one: tibial peak (min1: 6.5 (1.8) vs. 6.0 (1.7) g, <i>P</i> = .009, min5: 6.6 (1.7) vs. 6.2 (1.7) g, <i>P</i> = .035), tibial magnitude (min1: 8.3 (2.6) vs. 7.7 (2.4) g, <i>P</i> = .030, min5: 8.5 (2.6) vs. 7.9 (2.5) g, <i>P</i> = .026) and shock attenuation (min1: 61.4 (16.8) vs. 56.3 (16.3)%, <i>P</i> = .014, min5: 62.0 (15.5) vs. 57.2 (15.3)%, <i>P</i> = .040), and tibial rate throughout the entire run (504.3 (229.7) vs. 422.7 (212.9) g/s, <i>P</i> = .006). However, it was more stable throughout 30-min running (<i>P</i> < .05). These results show that the shape customisation entailed by the thermoformable material does not provide impact acceleration improvements.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact accelerations during a prolonged run using a microwavable self-customised foot orthosis.\",\"authors\":\"Irene Jimenez-Perez, Jose Ignacio Priego-Quesada, Andrés Camacho-García, Rosa Mª Cibrián Ortiz de Anda, Pedro Pérez-Soriano\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14763141.2021.1902553\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The use of custom-made foot orthoses has been associated with numerous benefits, such as decreased impact accelerations. However, it is not known whether this effect could be due to better customisation. The present study analysed the effects of the first generation of a microwavable prefabricated self-customised foot orthosis vs. a prefabricated standard one on impact accelerations throughout a prolonged run. Thirty runners performed two tests of 30-min running on a treadmill, each one with an orthosis condition. Impact acceleration variables of tibia and head were recorded every 5 min. Microwavable self-customised foot orthosis increased the following variables in the first instants compared to the prefabricated standard one: tibial peak (min1: 6.5 (1.8) vs. 6.0 (1.7) g, <i>P</i> = .009, min5: 6.6 (1.7) vs. 6.2 (1.7) g, <i>P</i> = .035), tibial magnitude (min1: 8.3 (2.6) vs. 7.7 (2.4) g, <i>P</i> = .030, min5: 8.5 (2.6) vs. 7.9 (2.5) g, <i>P</i> = .026) and shock attenuation (min1: 61.4 (16.8) vs. 56.3 (16.3)%, <i>P</i> = .014, min5: 62.0 (15.5) vs. 57.2 (15.3)%, <i>P</i> = .040), and tibial rate throughout the entire run (504.3 (229.7) vs. 422.7 (212.9) g/s, <i>P</i> = .006). However, it was more stable throughout 30-min running (<i>P</i> < .05). These results show that the shape customisation entailed by the thermoformable material does not provide impact acceleration improvements.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14763141.2021.1902553\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/6/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14763141.2021.1902553","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/6/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
使用定制的足部矫形器有很多好处,例如可以降低冲击加速度。然而,这种效果是否归功于更好的定制还不得而知。本研究分析了第一代微波预制自定制足部矫形器与预制标准足部矫形器在整个长跑过程中对冲击加速度的影响。30 名跑步者在跑步机上进行了两次 30 分钟的跑步测试,每次测试都使用了一种矫形器。每 5 分钟记录一次胫骨和头部的冲击加速度变量。6) vs. 7.7 (2.4) g, P = .030, min5: 8.5 (2.6) vs. 7.9 (2.5) g, P = .026) 和冲击衰减(min1: 61.4 (16.8) vs. 56.3 (16.3)%, P = .014,第 5 分钟:62.0 (15.5) vs. 57.2 (15.3)%,P = .040),以及整个跑步过程中的胫骨速率(504.3 (229.7) vs. 422.7 (212.9) g/s,P = .006)。然而,在整个 30 分钟的跑步过程中,胫骨率更为稳定(P
Impact accelerations during a prolonged run using a microwavable self-customised foot orthosis.
The use of custom-made foot orthoses has been associated with numerous benefits, such as decreased impact accelerations. However, it is not known whether this effect could be due to better customisation. The present study analysed the effects of the first generation of a microwavable prefabricated self-customised foot orthosis vs. a prefabricated standard one on impact accelerations throughout a prolonged run. Thirty runners performed two tests of 30-min running on a treadmill, each one with an orthosis condition. Impact acceleration variables of tibia and head were recorded every 5 min. Microwavable self-customised foot orthosis increased the following variables in the first instants compared to the prefabricated standard one: tibial peak (min1: 6.5 (1.8) vs. 6.0 (1.7) g, P = .009, min5: 6.6 (1.7) vs. 6.2 (1.7) g, P = .035), tibial magnitude (min1: 8.3 (2.6) vs. 7.7 (2.4) g, P = .030, min5: 8.5 (2.6) vs. 7.9 (2.5) g, P = .026) and shock attenuation (min1: 61.4 (16.8) vs. 56.3 (16.3)%, P = .014, min5: 62.0 (15.5) vs. 57.2 (15.3)%, P = .040), and tibial rate throughout the entire run (504.3 (229.7) vs. 422.7 (212.9) g/s, P = .006). However, it was more stable throughout 30-min running (P < .05). These results show that the shape customisation entailed by the thermoformable material does not provide impact acceleration improvements.