[认知刺激方案对认知正常老年人的效果分析:随机临床试验]。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Anales Del Sistema Sanitario De Navarra Pub Date : 2021-12-27 DOI:10.23938/ASSN.0961
E Calatayud, A Gómez-Cabello, I Gómez-Soria
{"title":"[认知刺激方案对认知正常老年人的效果分析:随机临床试验]。","authors":"E Calatayud,&nbsp;A Gómez-Cabello,&nbsp;I Gómez-Soria","doi":"10.23938/ASSN.0961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cognitive stimulation programs in older adults seek cognitive and emotional improvements. The literature makes no reference to programs adapted according to cognitive and occupational levels in older adults with no cognitive impairment. The objective of this study was to analyze the effectiveness of level-adapted cognitive stimulation intervention in older adults in terms of cognition and mood.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Randomized clinical trial (CONSORT) at a health center, which included 201 participants =?65 years (101 intervention and 100 control) evaluated immediately after the intervention, then at six months and finally at one year. The assessment instruments were the cognitive mini-exam (CME), the abbreviated Goldberg anxiety scale and the Yesavage geriatric depression scale (GDS-15). The intervention was carried out through a cognitive stimulation program with two cognitive levels according to CME (high: 32-35; low: 28-31) with ten sessions of 45 minutes. Statistical analysis was performed by Student's t-test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The difference observed in the averages between control and intervention groups was statistically significant in the three assessments; these differences were observed regardless of gender, age, cognitive level, and mood. One year after the intervention, CME score reached an increase of 1.48 points in the in the high level group and 2.03 points in the low level. However, no significant differences in CME score were observed in any of the assessments for anxiety or depression.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A cognitive stimulation program, cognitive level-adapted, has shown cognitive benefits in older adults without cognitive impairment living in the community, regardless of sex, age and educational level.</p>","PeriodicalId":7775,"journal":{"name":"Anales Del Sistema Sanitario De Navarra","volume":"44 3","pages":"361-372"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Analysis of the effect of cognitive stimulation program in older adults with normal cognition: randomized clinical trial].\",\"authors\":\"E Calatayud,&nbsp;A Gómez-Cabello,&nbsp;I Gómez-Soria\",\"doi\":\"10.23938/ASSN.0961\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cognitive stimulation programs in older adults seek cognitive and emotional improvements. The literature makes no reference to programs adapted according to cognitive and occupational levels in older adults with no cognitive impairment. The objective of this study was to analyze the effectiveness of level-adapted cognitive stimulation intervention in older adults in terms of cognition and mood.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Randomized clinical trial (CONSORT) at a health center, which included 201 participants =?65 years (101 intervention and 100 control) evaluated immediately after the intervention, then at six months and finally at one year. The assessment instruments were the cognitive mini-exam (CME), the abbreviated Goldberg anxiety scale and the Yesavage geriatric depression scale (GDS-15). The intervention was carried out through a cognitive stimulation program with two cognitive levels according to CME (high: 32-35; low: 28-31) with ten sessions of 45 minutes. Statistical analysis was performed by Student's t-test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The difference observed in the averages between control and intervention groups was statistically significant in the three assessments; these differences were observed regardless of gender, age, cognitive level, and mood. One year after the intervention, CME score reached an increase of 1.48 points in the in the high level group and 2.03 points in the low level. However, no significant differences in CME score were observed in any of the assessments for anxiety or depression.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A cognitive stimulation program, cognitive level-adapted, has shown cognitive benefits in older adults without cognitive impairment living in the community, regardless of sex, age and educational level.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7775,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anales Del Sistema Sanitario De Navarra\",\"volume\":\"44 3\",\"pages\":\"361-372\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anales Del Sistema Sanitario De Navarra\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23938/ASSN.0961\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anales Del Sistema Sanitario De Navarra","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23938/ASSN.0961","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:老年人的认知刺激项目寻求认知和情绪的改善。文献没有提到根据认知和职业水平对无认知障碍的老年人进行调整的方案。本研究的目的是分析水平适应认知刺激干预在老年人认知和情绪方面的有效性。方法:在某卫生中心进行随机临床试验(CONSORT),纳入201名受试者=?65岁(101名干预组和100名对照组)在干预后立即评估,然后在6个月后评估,最后在1年评估。评估工具为认知迷你考试(CME)、简略Goldberg焦虑量表和Yesavage老年抑郁量表(GDS-15)。干预通过认知刺激计划进行,根据CME分为两个认知水平(高:32-35;低:28-31),10次,每次45分钟。统计学分析采用Student’st检验。结果:对照组与干预组三项评估的平均值差异均有统计学意义;这些差异与性别、年龄、认知水平和情绪无关。干预一年后,高水平组CME得分上升1.48分,低水平组CME得分上升2.03分。然而,在焦虑或抑郁的任何评估中,CME评分均未观察到显着差异。结论:一种认知水平适应的认知刺激方案对生活在社区中的无认知障碍的老年人显示出认知益处,无论其性别、年龄和受教育程度如何。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Analysis of the effect of cognitive stimulation program in older adults with normal cognition: randomized clinical trial].

Background: Cognitive stimulation programs in older adults seek cognitive and emotional improvements. The literature makes no reference to programs adapted according to cognitive and occupational levels in older adults with no cognitive impairment. The objective of this study was to analyze the effectiveness of level-adapted cognitive stimulation intervention in older adults in terms of cognition and mood.

Methods: Randomized clinical trial (CONSORT) at a health center, which included 201 participants =?65 years (101 intervention and 100 control) evaluated immediately after the intervention, then at six months and finally at one year. The assessment instruments were the cognitive mini-exam (CME), the abbreviated Goldberg anxiety scale and the Yesavage geriatric depression scale (GDS-15). The intervention was carried out through a cognitive stimulation program with two cognitive levels according to CME (high: 32-35; low: 28-31) with ten sessions of 45 minutes. Statistical analysis was performed by Student's t-test.

Results: The difference observed in the averages between control and intervention groups was statistically significant in the three assessments; these differences were observed regardless of gender, age, cognitive level, and mood. One year after the intervention, CME score reached an increase of 1.48 points in the in the high level group and 2.03 points in the low level. However, no significant differences in CME score were observed in any of the assessments for anxiety or depression.

Conclusion: A cognitive stimulation program, cognitive level-adapted, has shown cognitive benefits in older adults without cognitive impairment living in the community, regardless of sex, age and educational level.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Anales Del Sistema Sanitario De Navarra
Anales Del Sistema Sanitario De Navarra 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
30.00%
发文量
88
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: La revista Anales del Sistema Sanitario de Navarra es una revista de contenido médico sanitario de carácter generalista. En ella tienen cabida artículos referidos a temas de salud/enfermedad en general, salud pública, administración y gestión sanitaria y Atención Primaria de salud.
期刊最新文献
Bilateral subgaleal hematoma after a robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: an uncommon complication. Psychometric analysis of the Psychiatric Diagnostic Screening Questionnaire (PDSQ) and determinants of psychopathology in two outpatient clinics in Navarre (Spain). Effect of mouthwashes on the microhardness of aesthetic composite restorative materials. [Prevalence of dental and mucosal lesions among the pediatric population who attended the emergency department of a general hospital]. [Breastfeeding and rooming-in in the management of neonatal abstinence syndrome. Scoping review].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1