近乎最佳的个体化治疗建议。

IF 4.3 3区 计算机科学 Q1 AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS Journal of Machine Learning Research Pub Date : 2020-01-01
Haomiao Meng, Ying-Qi Zhao, Haoda Fu, Xingye Qiao
{"title":"近乎最佳的个体化治疗建议。","authors":"Haomiao Meng,&nbsp;Ying-Qi Zhao,&nbsp;Haoda Fu,&nbsp;Xingye Qiao","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The individualized treatment recommendation (ITR) is an important analytic framework for precision medicine. The goal of ITR is to assign the best treatments to patients based on their individual characteristics. From the machine learning perspective, the solution to the ITR problem can be formulated as a weighted classification problem to maximize the mean benefit from the recommended treatments given patients' characteristics. Several ITR methods have been proposed in both the binary setting and the multicategory setting. In practice, one may prefer a more flexible recommendation that includes multiple treatment options. This motivates us to develop methods to obtain a set of near-optimal individualized treatment recommendations alternative to each other, called alternative individualized treatment recommendations (A-ITR). We propose two methods to estimate the optimal A-ITR within the outcome weighted learning (OWL) framework. Simulation studies and a real data analysis for Type 2 diabetic patients with injectable antidiabetic treatments are conducted to show the usefulness of the proposed A-ITR framework. We also show the consistency of these methods and obtain an upper bound for the risk between the theoretically optimal recommendation and the estimated one. An R package aitr has been developed, found at https://github.com/menghaomiao/aitr.</p>","PeriodicalId":50161,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Machine Learning Research","volume":"21 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8324003/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Near-optimal Individualized Treatment Recommendations.\",\"authors\":\"Haomiao Meng,&nbsp;Ying-Qi Zhao,&nbsp;Haoda Fu,&nbsp;Xingye Qiao\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The individualized treatment recommendation (ITR) is an important analytic framework for precision medicine. The goal of ITR is to assign the best treatments to patients based on their individual characteristics. From the machine learning perspective, the solution to the ITR problem can be formulated as a weighted classification problem to maximize the mean benefit from the recommended treatments given patients' characteristics. Several ITR methods have been proposed in both the binary setting and the multicategory setting. In practice, one may prefer a more flexible recommendation that includes multiple treatment options. This motivates us to develop methods to obtain a set of near-optimal individualized treatment recommendations alternative to each other, called alternative individualized treatment recommendations (A-ITR). We propose two methods to estimate the optimal A-ITR within the outcome weighted learning (OWL) framework. Simulation studies and a real data analysis for Type 2 diabetic patients with injectable antidiabetic treatments are conducted to show the usefulness of the proposed A-ITR framework. We also show the consistency of these methods and obtain an upper bound for the risk between the theoretically optimal recommendation and the estimated one. An R package aitr has been developed, found at https://github.com/menghaomiao/aitr.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50161,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Machine Learning Research\",\"volume\":\"21 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8324003/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Machine Learning Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Machine Learning Research","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

个体化治疗推荐(ITR)是精准医疗的重要分析框架。ITR的目标是根据患者的个体特征分配最佳治疗方案。从机器学习的角度来看,ITR问题的解决方案可以被表述为一个加权分类问题,以最大化根据患者特征推荐治疗的平均收益。在二元设置和多类别设置下,提出了几种ITR方法。实际上,人们可能更喜欢更灵活的建议,包括多种治疗方案。这促使我们开发方法来获得一组相互替代的接近最佳的个体化治疗建议,称为替代个体化治疗建议(a - itr)。我们提出了两种方法来估计结果加权学习(OWL)框架下的最优A-ITR。通过对2型糖尿病患者注射降糖治疗的模拟研究和真实数据分析,证明了所提出的a - itr框架的有效性。我们还证明了这些方法的一致性,并得到了理论最优推荐和估计风险之间的上界。已经开发了一个R包,可以在https://github.com/menghaomiao/aitr上找到。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Near-optimal Individualized Treatment Recommendations.

The individualized treatment recommendation (ITR) is an important analytic framework for precision medicine. The goal of ITR is to assign the best treatments to patients based on their individual characteristics. From the machine learning perspective, the solution to the ITR problem can be formulated as a weighted classification problem to maximize the mean benefit from the recommended treatments given patients' characteristics. Several ITR methods have been proposed in both the binary setting and the multicategory setting. In practice, one may prefer a more flexible recommendation that includes multiple treatment options. This motivates us to develop methods to obtain a set of near-optimal individualized treatment recommendations alternative to each other, called alternative individualized treatment recommendations (A-ITR). We propose two methods to estimate the optimal A-ITR within the outcome weighted learning (OWL) framework. Simulation studies and a real data analysis for Type 2 diabetic patients with injectable antidiabetic treatments are conducted to show the usefulness of the proposed A-ITR framework. We also show the consistency of these methods and obtain an upper bound for the risk between the theoretically optimal recommendation and the estimated one. An R package aitr has been developed, found at https://github.com/menghaomiao/aitr.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Machine Learning Research
Journal of Machine Learning Research 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
18.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Machine Learning Research (JMLR) provides an international forum for the electronic and paper publication of high-quality scholarly articles in all areas of machine learning. All published papers are freely available online. JMLR has a commitment to rigorous yet rapid reviewing. JMLR seeks previously unpublished papers on machine learning that contain: new principled algorithms with sound empirical validation, and with justification of theoretical, psychological, or biological nature; experimental and/or theoretical studies yielding new insight into the design and behavior of learning in intelligent systems; accounts of applications of existing techniques that shed light on the strengths and weaknesses of the methods; formalization of new learning tasks (e.g., in the context of new applications) and of methods for assessing performance on those tasks; development of new analytical frameworks that advance theoretical studies of practical learning methods; computational models of data from natural learning systems at the behavioral or neural level; or extremely well-written surveys of existing work.
期刊最新文献
Convergence for nonconvex ADMM, with applications to CT imaging. Effect-Invariant Mechanisms for Policy Generalization. Nonparametric Regression for 3D Point Cloud Learning. Batch Normalization Preconditioning for Stochastic Gradient Langevin Dynamics Why Self-Attention is Natural for Sequence-to-Sequence Problems? A Perspective from Symmetries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1