Leili Tavabi, Trang Tran, Kalin Stefanov, Brian Borsari, Joshua D Woolley, Stefan Scherer, Mohammad Soleymani
{"title":"动机访谈中的行为分类分析。","authors":"Leili Tavabi, Trang Tran, Kalin Stefanov, Brian Borsari, Joshua D Woolley, Stefan Scherer, Mohammad Soleymani","doi":"10.18653/v1/2021.clpsych-1.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Analysis of client and therapist behavior in counseling sessions can provide helpful insights for assessing the quality of the session and consequently, the client's behavioral outcome. In this paper, we study the automatic classification of standardized behavior codes (i.e. annotations) used for assessment of psychotherapy sessions in Motivational Interviewing (MI). We develop models and examine the classification of client behaviors throughout MI sessions, comparing the performance by models trained on large pretrained embeddings (RoBERTa) versus interpretable and expert-selected features (LIWC). Our best performing model using the pretrained RoBERTa embeddings beats the baseline model, achieving an F1 score of 0.66 in the subject-independent 3-class classification. Through statistical analysis on the classification results, we identify prominent LIWC features that may not have been captured by the model using pretrained embeddings. Although classification using LIWC features underperforms RoBERTa, our findings motivate the future direction of incorporating auxiliary tasks in the classification of MI codes.</p>","PeriodicalId":74542,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the conference. Association for Computational Linguistics. North American Chapter. Meeting","volume":"2021 ","pages":"110-115"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8321779/pdf/nihms-1727153.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of Behavior Classification in Motivational Interviewing.\",\"authors\":\"Leili Tavabi, Trang Tran, Kalin Stefanov, Brian Borsari, Joshua D Woolley, Stefan Scherer, Mohammad Soleymani\",\"doi\":\"10.18653/v1/2021.clpsych-1.13\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Analysis of client and therapist behavior in counseling sessions can provide helpful insights for assessing the quality of the session and consequently, the client's behavioral outcome. In this paper, we study the automatic classification of standardized behavior codes (i.e. annotations) used for assessment of psychotherapy sessions in Motivational Interviewing (MI). We develop models and examine the classification of client behaviors throughout MI sessions, comparing the performance by models trained on large pretrained embeddings (RoBERTa) versus interpretable and expert-selected features (LIWC). Our best performing model using the pretrained RoBERTa embeddings beats the baseline model, achieving an F1 score of 0.66 in the subject-independent 3-class classification. Through statistical analysis on the classification results, we identify prominent LIWC features that may not have been captured by the model using pretrained embeddings. Although classification using LIWC features underperforms RoBERTa, our findings motivate the future direction of incorporating auxiliary tasks in the classification of MI codes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the conference. Association for Computational Linguistics. North American Chapter. Meeting\",\"volume\":\"2021 \",\"pages\":\"110-115\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8321779/pdf/nihms-1727153.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the conference. Association for Computational Linguistics. North American Chapter. Meeting\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.clpsych-1.13\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the conference. Association for Computational Linguistics. North American Chapter. Meeting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.clpsych-1.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
对客户和治疗师在心理咨询过程中的行为进行分析,有助于评估咨询过程的质量,进而评估客户的行为结果。在本文中,我们研究了标准化行为代码(即注释)的自动分类,用于评估动机访谈法(MI)中的心理治疗过程。我们开发了模型并研究了客户在整个动机访谈过程中的行为分类,比较了在大型预训练嵌入(RoBERTa)和可解释及专家选择特征(LIWC)上训练的模型的性能。我们使用预训练的 RoBERTa 嵌入的最佳表现模型击败了基线模型,在与主体无关的三类分类中取得了 0.66 的 F1 分数。通过对分类结果的统计分析,我们发现了使用预训练嵌入的模型可能没有捕捉到的突出的 LIWC 特征。虽然使用 LIWC 特征进行分类的结果不如 RoBERTa,但我们的研究结果为在 MI 代码分类中加入辅助任务提供了新的方向。
Analysis of Behavior Classification in Motivational Interviewing.
Analysis of client and therapist behavior in counseling sessions can provide helpful insights for assessing the quality of the session and consequently, the client's behavioral outcome. In this paper, we study the automatic classification of standardized behavior codes (i.e. annotations) used for assessment of psychotherapy sessions in Motivational Interviewing (MI). We develop models and examine the classification of client behaviors throughout MI sessions, comparing the performance by models trained on large pretrained embeddings (RoBERTa) versus interpretable and expert-selected features (LIWC). Our best performing model using the pretrained RoBERTa embeddings beats the baseline model, achieving an F1 score of 0.66 in the subject-independent 3-class classification. Through statistical analysis on the classification results, we identify prominent LIWC features that may not have been captured by the model using pretrained embeddings. Although classification using LIWC features underperforms RoBERTa, our findings motivate the future direction of incorporating auxiliary tasks in the classification of MI codes.