自动化和部门再分配。

IF 1.7 4区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Series-Journal of the Spanish Economic Association Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-07-30 DOI:10.1007/s13209-021-00240-w
Dennis C Hutschenreiter, Tommaso Santini, Eugenia Vella
{"title":"自动化和部门再分配。","authors":"Dennis C Hutschenreiter,&nbsp;Tommaso Santini,&nbsp;Eugenia Vella","doi":"10.1007/s13209-021-00240-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Empirical evidence in Dauth et al. (J Eur Econ Assoc, 2021) suggests that industrial robot adoption in Germany has led to a sectoral reallocation of employment from manufacturing to services, leaving total employment unaffected. We rationalize this evidence through the lens of a general equilibrium model with two sectors, matching frictions and endogenous participation. Automation induces firms to create fewer vacancies and job seekers to search less in the automatable sector (manufacturing). The service sector expands due to the sectoral complementarity in the production of the final good and a positive wealth effect for the household. Analysis across steady states shows that the reduction in manufacturing employment can be offset by the increase in service employment. The model can also replicate the magnitude of the decline in the ratio of manufacturing employment to service employment in Germany between 1994 and 2014.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13209-021-00240-w.</p>","PeriodicalId":54185,"journal":{"name":"Series-Journal of the Spanish Economic Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8323451/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Automation and sectoral reallocation.\",\"authors\":\"Dennis C Hutschenreiter,&nbsp;Tommaso Santini,&nbsp;Eugenia Vella\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13209-021-00240-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Empirical evidence in Dauth et al. (J Eur Econ Assoc, 2021) suggests that industrial robot adoption in Germany has led to a sectoral reallocation of employment from manufacturing to services, leaving total employment unaffected. We rationalize this evidence through the lens of a general equilibrium model with two sectors, matching frictions and endogenous participation. Automation induces firms to create fewer vacancies and job seekers to search less in the automatable sector (manufacturing). The service sector expands due to the sectoral complementarity in the production of the final good and a positive wealth effect for the household. Analysis across steady states shows that the reduction in manufacturing employment can be offset by the increase in service employment. The model can also replicate the magnitude of the decline in the ratio of manufacturing employment to service employment in Germany between 1994 and 2014.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13209-021-00240-w.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54185,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Series-Journal of the Spanish Economic Association\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8323451/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Series-Journal of the Spanish Economic Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13209-021-00240-w\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/7/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Series-Journal of the Spanish Economic Association","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13209-021-00240-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/7/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

Dauth等人的经验证据(J Eur economic association, 2021)表明,德国工业机器人的采用导致了就业从制造业向服务业的部门再分配,使总就业不受影响。我们通过具有两个部门的一般均衡模型(匹配摩擦和内生参与)来合理化这一证据。自动化导致公司减少职位空缺,求职者减少在自动化部门(制造业)的搜索。由于最终产品生产的部门互补性和对家庭的积极财富效应,服务部门扩大了。对稳定状态的分析表明,制造业就业的减少可以被服务业就业的增加所抵消。该模型还可以复制1994年至2014年间德国制造业就业与服务业就业之比下降的幅度。补充资料:在线版本补充资料:10.1007/s13209-021-00240-w。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Automation and sectoral reallocation.

Empirical evidence in Dauth et al. (J Eur Econ Assoc, 2021) suggests that industrial robot adoption in Germany has led to a sectoral reallocation of employment from manufacturing to services, leaving total employment unaffected. We rationalize this evidence through the lens of a general equilibrium model with two sectors, matching frictions and endogenous participation. Automation induces firms to create fewer vacancies and job seekers to search less in the automatable sector (manufacturing). The service sector expands due to the sectoral complementarity in the production of the final good and a positive wealth effect for the household. Analysis across steady states shows that the reduction in manufacturing employment can be offset by the increase in service employment. The model can also replicate the magnitude of the decline in the ratio of manufacturing employment to service employment in Germany between 1994 and 2014.

Supplementary information: The online version supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13209-021-00240-w.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
10
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: SERIEs is a single-blind peer-reviewed open access journal. In the Journal Citation Reports (JCR) the impact factor of the journal in 2020 is 1.088 and, in Scopus, we are in the top quartile according to Scimago Journal Ranking and the CiteScores. SERIEs - Journal of the Spanish Economic Association is the result of a merger between the two most important academic economics journals in Spain: Spanish Economic Review (SER) and Investigaciones Económicas (IE). The new journal publishes scientific articles in all areas of economics. We welcome both theoretical and empirical papers and place great value on applying high quality standards. SERIEs seeks to maintain the reputation gained by its predecessors as the most prominent economics journals in Spain, and to become a major internationally recognized journal. The journal is receptive to high-quality papers on any topic and from any source. At the same time, as official journal of the Spanish Economic Association, SERIEs is very interested in high-quality empirical papers about the Spanish and the European economy. The publication costs are covered by Spanish Economic Association so authors do not need to pay an article-processing charge. The journal operates a single-blind peer-review system, where the reviewers are aware of the names and affiliations of the authors, but the reviewer reports provided to authors are anonymous. SERIEs encourages authors to share their data where possible. For further details on the data policy for the journal please see the Springer Nature page here: https://www.springernature.com/gp/authors/research-data-policy/repositories-general/12327166 Officially cited as: SERIEs-Journal of the Spanish Economic Association
期刊最新文献
Revisiting the public-private wage gap in Spain: new evidence and interpretation. Schumpeter meets Goldilocks: the scarring effects of firm destruction. The aggregate effects of government income transfers shocks: EU evidence. Automation and sectoral reallocation. Work and children in Spain: challenges and opportunities for equality between men and women.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1