夫妇谈论母乳喂养:采访父母关于决策,挑战,父亲的角色和专业支持。

IF 1.7 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Health Psychology Open Pub Date : 2021-07-23 eCollection Date: 2021-07-01 DOI:10.1177/20551029211029158
Erin J Henshaw, Maria Mayer, Sarina Balraj, Elsie Parmar, Kristine Durkin, Rita Snell
{"title":"夫妇谈论母乳喂养:采访父母关于决策,挑战,父亲的角色和专业支持。","authors":"Erin J Henshaw,&nbsp;Maria Mayer,&nbsp;Sarina Balraj,&nbsp;Elsie Parmar,&nbsp;Kristine Durkin,&nbsp;Rita Snell","doi":"10.1177/20551029211029158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite health benefits, sustained breastfeeding rates remain low in the United States, and the role of partners in breastfeeding is not well understood. Using a grounded theory approach, the current qualitative study explored how couples communicate regarding breastfeeding decisions and challenges. Mother-father dyads (<i>n</i> = 16) completed individual semi-structured interviews 1 year after the birth of their first child. Following iterative qualitative analysis, three phases of breastfeeding communication emerged: <i>Should we try this? (</i> <i>Mother's opinion counts)</i> <i>How do we make this work?</i> <b><i>(adjusting and problem-solving)</i></b> and <i>How do we settle into a routine?</i> <i>(gaining confidence, resolving issues)</i> Findings underscore the complexity of defining the partner role in breastfeeding.</p>","PeriodicalId":55856,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Open","volume":"8 2","pages":"20551029211029158"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/20551029211029158","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Couples talk about breastfeeding: Interviews with parents about decision-making, challenges, and the role of fathers and professional support.\",\"authors\":\"Erin J Henshaw,&nbsp;Maria Mayer,&nbsp;Sarina Balraj,&nbsp;Elsie Parmar,&nbsp;Kristine Durkin,&nbsp;Rita Snell\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20551029211029158\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Despite health benefits, sustained breastfeeding rates remain low in the United States, and the role of partners in breastfeeding is not well understood. Using a grounded theory approach, the current qualitative study explored how couples communicate regarding breastfeeding decisions and challenges. Mother-father dyads (<i>n</i> = 16) completed individual semi-structured interviews 1 year after the birth of their first child. Following iterative qualitative analysis, three phases of breastfeeding communication emerged: <i>Should we try this? (</i> <i>Mother's opinion counts)</i> <i>How do we make this work?</i> <b><i>(adjusting and problem-solving)</i></b> and <i>How do we settle into a routine?</i> <i>(gaining confidence, resolving issues)</i> Findings underscore the complexity of defining the partner role in breastfeeding.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55856,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Psychology Open\",\"volume\":\"8 2\",\"pages\":\"20551029211029158\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/20551029211029158\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Psychology Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20551029211029158\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Psychology Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20551029211029158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

尽管对健康有益,但在美国,持续母乳喂养的比例仍然很低,而且人们对伴侣在母乳喂养中的作用也没有很好的了解。采用扎根的理论方法,目前的定性研究探讨了夫妇如何就母乳喂养的决定和挑战进行沟通。16对父母在他们的第一个孩子出生一年后完成了单独的半结构化访谈。经过反复的定性分析,母乳喂养沟通出现了三个阶段:我们应该尝试这个吗?(母亲的意见很重要)我们怎么做呢?(调整和解决问题)以及我们如何适应常规?(获得信心,解决问题)研究结果强调了界定伴侣在母乳喂养中的作用的复杂性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Couples talk about breastfeeding: Interviews with parents about decision-making, challenges, and the role of fathers and professional support.

Despite health benefits, sustained breastfeeding rates remain low in the United States, and the role of partners in breastfeeding is not well understood. Using a grounded theory approach, the current qualitative study explored how couples communicate regarding breastfeeding decisions and challenges. Mother-father dyads (n = 16) completed individual semi-structured interviews 1 year after the birth of their first child. Following iterative qualitative analysis, three phases of breastfeeding communication emerged: Should we try this? ( Mother's opinion counts) How do we make this work? (adjusting and problem-solving) and How do we settle into a routine? (gaining confidence, resolving issues) Findings underscore the complexity of defining the partner role in breastfeeding.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Psychology Open
Health Psychology Open Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Psychology Open (HPO) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access, online-only journal providing rapid publication. HPO is dedicated to publishing cutting-edge research in health psychology from around the world. HPO seeks to provide a platform for both traditional empirical analyses and more qualitative and/or critically oriented approaches to health psychology. All areas of health psychology are covered, but these topics are of particular interest: Clinical health psychology Critical health psychology Community health psychology Health psychology practice Health psychology through a social, cultural or regional lens The journal particularly favours papers that focus on health psychology in practice, including submissions concerning community and/or clinical applications and interventions. Review articles are also welcomed. There is no fixed limit to the length of manuscripts, which is normally strictly limited in other journals, for example HPO’s sister journal, Journal of Health Psychology (JHP). Studies published in this journal are required to obtain ethical approval from an Institutional Review Board. Such approval must include informed, signed consent by all research participants. Any manuscript not containing an explicit statement concerning ethical approval and informed consent will not be considered.
期刊最新文献
Development and initial validation of the multilingual Swiss version of the brief parental burnout scale. Bibliometric analysis of global research on psychological well-being, subjective burden, and psychosocial support of family caregivers of cancer patients. Tobacco harm perceptions, regulatory attitudes, and cessation intentions before and after the COVID-19 lockdown in California. Cognitive dysfunction and disturbed daily activities of people with dementia impact the psychological stress in family caregivers depending on their anxiety and depression severity. Changes in self-rated health, quality of life, and psychological flexibility among adults with overweight over a 24-month acceptance and commitment therapy-based lifestyle intervention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1