美国COVID-19危机早期的社会参与:在一个在线样本中探索有抑郁或焦虑的人和没有抑郁或焦虑的人之间的社会支持和亲社会行为。

IF 1 4区心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI:10.1521/jscp.2020.39.10.923

Adam P McGuire, Candice Hayden, Sheila B Frankfurt, A Solomon Kurz, Austen R Anderson, Binh An N Howard, Yvette Z Szabo

{"title":"美国COVID-19危机早期的社会参与:在一个在线样本中探索有抑郁或焦虑的人和没有抑郁或焦虑的人之间的社会支持和亲社会行为。","authors":"Adam P McGuire, Candice Hayden, Sheila B Frankfurt, A Solomon Kurz, Austen R Anderson, Binh An N Howard, Yvette Z Szabo","doi":"10.1521/jscp.2020.39.10.923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Social distancing and sheltering-in-place mitigate the physical health risks of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19); however, there are concerns about the impact on mental health and social engagement.Methods: We used data from a U.S.-based online survey (March 2020) to examine patterns of social support and prosocial behavior, explore differences between people with and without depression or anxiety, and explore correlates of social engagement in both groups, including symptom severity in the clinical group.Results: The clinical group reported greater social engagement. In both groups, social engagement was positively associated with COVID-19-related worry and trait moral elevation; mindfulness was positively associated with all outcomes for the clinical group only. Social interaction frequency had little influence on outcomes. Depressive symptom severity was positively associated with all outcomes, whereas anxiety was negatively associated with prosocial behavior.Discussion: These findings highlight how social engagement was experienced early in the U.S. COVID-19 crisis.","PeriodicalId":48202,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology","volume":"39 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8404209/pdf/nihms-1730268.pdf","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SOCIAL ENGAGEMENT EARLY IN THE U.S. COVID-19 CRISIS: EXPLORING SOCIAL SUPPORT AND PROSOCIAL BEHAVIOR BETWEEN THOSE WITH AND WITHOUT DEPRESSION OR ANXIETY IN AN ONLINE SAMPLE.\",\"authors\":\"Adam P McGuire, Candice Hayden, Sheila B Frankfurt, A Solomon Kurz, Austen R Anderson, Binh An N Howard, Yvette Z Szabo\",\"doi\":\"10.1521/jscp.2020.39.10.923\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Social distancing and sheltering-in-place mitigate the physical health risks of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19); however, there are concerns about the impact on mental health and social engagement.Methods: We used data from a U.S.-based online survey (March 2020) to examine patterns of social support and prosocial behavior, explore differences between people with and without depression or anxiety, and explore correlates of social engagement in both groups, including symptom severity in the clinical group.Results: The clinical group reported greater social engagement. In both groups, social engagement was positively associated with COVID-19-related worry and trait moral elevation; mindfulness was positively associated with all outcomes for the clinical group only. Social interaction frequency had little influence on outcomes. Depressive symptom severity was positively associated with all outcomes, whereas anxiety was negatively associated with prosocial behavior.Discussion: These findings highlight how social engagement was experienced early in the U.S. COVID-19 crisis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48202,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology\",\"volume\":\"39 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8404209/pdf/nihms-1730268.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2020.39.10.923\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2020.39.10.923","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 5

摘要

导语:保持社交距离和就地避难可减轻新型冠状病毒(COVID-19)的身体健康风险;然而，人们担心这对心理健康和社会参与的影响。方法:我们使用来自美国在线调查(2020年3月)的数据来检查社会支持和亲社会行为的模式，探索有抑郁或焦虑的人和没有抑郁或焦虑的人之间的差异，并探索两组社会参与的相关性，包括临床组的症状严重程度。结果:临床组报告了更大的社会参与。在两组中，社交参与与covid -19相关的担忧和特质道德提升呈正相关;仅在临床组，正念与所有结果呈正相关。社会互动频率对结果影响不大。抑郁症状严重程度与所有结果呈正相关，而焦虑与亲社会行为呈负相关。讨论:这些发现突出了美国在COVID-19危机早期是如何经历社会参与的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

SOCIAL ENGAGEMENT EARLY IN THE U.S. COVID-19 CRISIS: EXPLORING SOCIAL SUPPORT AND PROSOCIAL BEHAVIOR BETWEEN THOSE WITH AND WITHOUT DEPRESSION OR ANXIETY IN AN ONLINE SAMPLE.

Introduction: Social distancing and sheltering-in-place mitigate the physical health risks of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19); however, there are concerns about the impact on mental health and social engagement.

Methods: We used data from a U.S.-based online survey (March 2020) to examine patterns of social support and prosocial behavior, explore differences between people with and without depression or anxiety, and explore correlates of social engagement in both groups, including symptom severity in the clinical group.

Results: The clinical group reported greater social engagement. In both groups, social engagement was positively associated with COVID-19-related worry and trait moral elevation; mindfulness was positively associated with all outcomes for the clinical group only. Social interaction frequency had little influence on outcomes. Depressive symptom severity was positively associated with all outcomes, whereas anxiety was negatively associated with prosocial behavior.

Discussion: These findings highlight how social engagement was experienced early in the U.S. COVID-19 crisis.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology Multiple-

CiteScore

2.90

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： This journal is devoted to the application of theory and research from social psychology toward the better understanding of human adaptation and adjustment, including both the alleviation of psychological problems and distress (e.g., psychopathology) and the enhancement of psychological well-being among the psychologically healthy. Topics of interest include (but are not limited to) traditionally defined psychopathology (e.g., depression), common emotional and behavioral problems in living (e.g., conflicts in close relationships), the enhancement of subjective well-being, and the processes of psychological change in everyday life (e.g., self-regulation) and professional settings (e.g., psychotherapy and counseling). Articles reporting the results of theory-driven empirical research are given priority, but theoretical articles, review articles, clinical case studies, and essays on professional issues are also welcome. Articles describing the development of new scales (personality or otherwise) or the revision of existing scales are not appropriate for this journal.