[案例管理者对他们在(未来)痴呆患者安乐死请求中所扮演角色的看法]。

Marjolijn van Daalen, Eefje Sizoo, Simone Hendriks, Annelie Monnier, Marike de Boer, Cees Hertogh
{"title":"[案例管理者对他们在(未来)痴呆患者安乐死请求中所扮演角色的看法]。","authors":"Marjolijn van Daalen,&nbsp;Eefje Sizoo,&nbsp;Simone Hendriks,&nbsp;Annelie Monnier,&nbsp;Marike de Boer,&nbsp;Cees Hertogh","doi":"10.36613/tgg.1875-6832/2021.02.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To anticipate future suffering due to dementia a growing number of people draft written advance euthanasia directives (AED). In actual practice the number of cases of euthanasia in advanced dementia is very limited. Dementia case managers are often closely involved since an early stage of the disease in the support and guidance of people with dementia and are well positioned to talk about the AED. This study aims to acquire insights into the way case managers deal with AEDs of people suffering from dementia. This qualitative study consists of two focus groups of ten case managers in total. Involvement of case managers was found to extend beyond discussing merely AEDs, to also the broader discussion of euthanasia and 'future euthanasia wishes' of patients with dementia. A thematic analysis of how case managers proceed with future euthanasia wishes yielded five themes: 1) Scenarios in practice; 2) Introduction of a written euthanasia directive as a conversation topic; 3) Guidance and support of the client and caregiver; 4) Cooperation with other health care workers; 5) Experienced dilemmas. The insights, provided by this study, into the role of case managers regarding the guidance of people with dementia and a future euthanasia wish contributes to a further optimization of the multidisciplinary collaboration between general practitioners and dementia case managers. Further research into the added value of this collaboration in dealing with these complicated issues around euthanasia in dementia care, is recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":39945,"journal":{"name":"Tijdschrift voor Gerontologie en Geriatrie","volume":"52 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Case managers' perceptions on their role in (future) euthanasia requests in patients with dementia].\",\"authors\":\"Marjolijn van Daalen,&nbsp;Eefje Sizoo,&nbsp;Simone Hendriks,&nbsp;Annelie Monnier,&nbsp;Marike de Boer,&nbsp;Cees Hertogh\",\"doi\":\"10.36613/tgg.1875-6832/2021.02.04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To anticipate future suffering due to dementia a growing number of people draft written advance euthanasia directives (AED). In actual practice the number of cases of euthanasia in advanced dementia is very limited. Dementia case managers are often closely involved since an early stage of the disease in the support and guidance of people with dementia and are well positioned to talk about the AED. This study aims to acquire insights into the way case managers deal with AEDs of people suffering from dementia. This qualitative study consists of two focus groups of ten case managers in total. Involvement of case managers was found to extend beyond discussing merely AEDs, to also the broader discussion of euthanasia and 'future euthanasia wishes' of patients with dementia. A thematic analysis of how case managers proceed with future euthanasia wishes yielded five themes: 1) Scenarios in practice; 2) Introduction of a written euthanasia directive as a conversation topic; 3) Guidance and support of the client and caregiver; 4) Cooperation with other health care workers; 5) Experienced dilemmas. The insights, provided by this study, into the role of case managers regarding the guidance of people with dementia and a future euthanasia wish contributes to a further optimization of the multidisciplinary collaboration between general practitioners and dementia case managers. Further research into the added value of this collaboration in dealing with these complicated issues around euthanasia in dementia care, is recommended.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tijdschrift voor Gerontologie en Geriatrie\",\"volume\":\"52 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tijdschrift voor Gerontologie en Geriatrie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36613/tgg.1875-6832/2021.02.04\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tijdschrift voor Gerontologie en Geriatrie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36613/tgg.1875-6832/2021.02.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了预测未来因痴呆症而遭受的痛苦,越来越多的人起草了书面的提前安乐死指令(AED)。在实际实践中,晚期痴呆症患者的安乐死案例非常有限。痴呆症病例管理人员通常从疾病的早期阶段就密切参与支持和指导痴呆症患者,并且能够很好地谈论AED。本研究旨在深入了解病例管理人员处理老年痴呆症患者的AEDs的方式。本定性研究由两个焦点小组共十个案例管理者组成。研究发现,病例管理人员的参与不仅仅局限于讨论aed,还涉及到更广泛的关于安乐死和痴呆症患者“未来安乐死愿望”的讨论。对案例管理者如何处理未来安乐死愿望的专题分析产生了五个主题:1)实践中的场景;2)引入书面安乐死指令作为谈话话题;3)来访者和照顾者的指导和支持;4)与其他医护人员的合作;5)经历过困境。本研究提供的关于病例管理人员在指导痴呆症患者和未来安乐死愿望方面的作用的见解有助于进一步优化全科医生和痴呆症病例管理人员之间的多学科合作。建议进一步研究这种合作的附加价值,以处理痴呆症护理中围绕安乐死的这些复杂问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Case managers' perceptions on their role in (future) euthanasia requests in patients with dementia].

To anticipate future suffering due to dementia a growing number of people draft written advance euthanasia directives (AED). In actual practice the number of cases of euthanasia in advanced dementia is very limited. Dementia case managers are often closely involved since an early stage of the disease in the support and guidance of people with dementia and are well positioned to talk about the AED. This study aims to acquire insights into the way case managers deal with AEDs of people suffering from dementia. This qualitative study consists of two focus groups of ten case managers in total. Involvement of case managers was found to extend beyond discussing merely AEDs, to also the broader discussion of euthanasia and 'future euthanasia wishes' of patients with dementia. A thematic analysis of how case managers proceed with future euthanasia wishes yielded five themes: 1) Scenarios in practice; 2) Introduction of a written euthanasia directive as a conversation topic; 3) Guidance and support of the client and caregiver; 4) Cooperation with other health care workers; 5) Experienced dilemmas. The insights, provided by this study, into the role of case managers regarding the guidance of people with dementia and a future euthanasia wish contributes to a further optimization of the multidisciplinary collaboration between general practitioners and dementia case managers. Further research into the added value of this collaboration in dealing with these complicated issues around euthanasia in dementia care, is recommended.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
期刊最新文献
Ervaringen met COVID-19 maatregelen onder oudere Nederlandse thuiswonende migranten [Evaluation of an information booklet on end-of-life care in dementia: a mixed-methods study assessing the preferences of family caregivers and healthcare professionals]. Onderzoek naar kwetsbaarheid bij ouderen: waar staan we 15 jaar na het Nationaal Programma Ouderenzorg? [The tradeoff between an open or closed unit for residents with dementia: a qualitative study]. [Experiences, wishes and needs of patients with regard to patient participation during geriatric rehabilitation].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1