阅读障碍学生理解缺陷的元分析综述

IF 2.1 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Annals of Dyslexia Pub Date : 2021-09-17 DOI:10.1007/s11881-021-00244-y
George K. Georgiou, Dalia Martinez, Ana Paula Alves Vieira, Andrea Antoniuk, Sandra Romero, Kan Guo
{"title":"阅读障碍学生理解缺陷的元分析综述","authors":"George K. Georgiou,&nbsp;Dalia Martinez,&nbsp;Ana Paula Alves Vieira,&nbsp;Andrea Antoniuk,&nbsp;Sandra Romero,&nbsp;Kan Guo","doi":"10.1007/s11881-021-00244-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Beyond the established difficulties of individuals with dyslexia in word recognition and spelling, it remains unclear how severe their difficulties in comprehension are. To examine this, we performed a meta-analytic review. A random-effects model analysis of data from 76 studies revealed a large deficit in reading comprehension in individuals with dyslexia compared to their chronological-age (CA) controls (<i>g</i> = 1.43) and a smaller one compared to their reading-level (RL) matched controls (<i>g</i> = 0.64). Individuals with dyslexia also differed significantly from their CA controls in listening comprehension (<i>g</i> = 0.43). Results further showed significant heterogeneity in the effect sizes that was partly explained by orthographic consistency (the deficits were larger in languages with low orthographic consistency) and vocabulary matching (the deficits were larger in studies in which the groups were not matched on vocabulary). These findings suggest, first, that individuals with dyslexia experience significant difficulties in both reading and listening comprehension, but the effect sizes are smaller than those reported in the literature for word reading and spelling. Second, our findings suggest that the deficits in reading comprehension are likely a combination of deficits in both decoding and oral language skills.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47273,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Dyslexia","volume":"72 2","pages":"204 - 248"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A meta-analytic review of comprehension deficits in students with dyslexia\",\"authors\":\"George K. Georgiou,&nbsp;Dalia Martinez,&nbsp;Ana Paula Alves Vieira,&nbsp;Andrea Antoniuk,&nbsp;Sandra Romero,&nbsp;Kan Guo\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11881-021-00244-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Beyond the established difficulties of individuals with dyslexia in word recognition and spelling, it remains unclear how severe their difficulties in comprehension are. To examine this, we performed a meta-analytic review. A random-effects model analysis of data from 76 studies revealed a large deficit in reading comprehension in individuals with dyslexia compared to their chronological-age (CA) controls (<i>g</i> = 1.43) and a smaller one compared to their reading-level (RL) matched controls (<i>g</i> = 0.64). Individuals with dyslexia also differed significantly from their CA controls in listening comprehension (<i>g</i> = 0.43). Results further showed significant heterogeneity in the effect sizes that was partly explained by orthographic consistency (the deficits were larger in languages with low orthographic consistency) and vocabulary matching (the deficits were larger in studies in which the groups were not matched on vocabulary). These findings suggest, first, that individuals with dyslexia experience significant difficulties in both reading and listening comprehension, but the effect sizes are smaller than those reported in the literature for word reading and spelling. Second, our findings suggest that the deficits in reading comprehension are likely a combination of deficits in both decoding and oral language skills.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Dyslexia\",\"volume\":\"72 2\",\"pages\":\"204 - 248\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Dyslexia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11881-021-00244-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Dyslexia","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11881-021-00244-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

除了阅读障碍患者在单词识别和拼写方面的既定困难外,他们的理解困难有多严重仍不清楚。为了检验这一点,我们进行了元分析审查。一项对76项研究数据的随机效应模型分析显示,与按时间顺序排列的年龄(CA)对照组相比,阅读障碍患者的阅读理解能力存在很大缺陷(g = 1.43),并且与它们的阅读水平(RL)匹配的对照组相比较小(g = 0.64)。有阅读障碍的个体在听力理解方面也与他们的CA对照组有显著差异(g = 0.43)。结果进一步表明,效应大小存在显著的异质性,这在一定程度上可以由正字法一致性(在正字法连贯性较低的语言中,缺陷较大)和词汇匹配(在词汇不匹配的研究中,缺陷更大)来解释。这些发现表明,首先,阅读障碍患者在阅读和听力理解方面都会遇到显著困难,但其影响程度小于文献中关于单词阅读和拼写的报道。其次,我们的研究结果表明,阅读理解的缺陷可能是解码和口语技能缺陷的结合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A meta-analytic review of comprehension deficits in students with dyslexia

Beyond the established difficulties of individuals with dyslexia in word recognition and spelling, it remains unclear how severe their difficulties in comprehension are. To examine this, we performed a meta-analytic review. A random-effects model analysis of data from 76 studies revealed a large deficit in reading comprehension in individuals with dyslexia compared to their chronological-age (CA) controls (g = 1.43) and a smaller one compared to their reading-level (RL) matched controls (g = 0.64). Individuals with dyslexia also differed significantly from their CA controls in listening comprehension (g = 0.43). Results further showed significant heterogeneity in the effect sizes that was partly explained by orthographic consistency (the deficits were larger in languages with low orthographic consistency) and vocabulary matching (the deficits were larger in studies in which the groups were not matched on vocabulary). These findings suggest, first, that individuals with dyslexia experience significant difficulties in both reading and listening comprehension, but the effect sizes are smaller than those reported in the literature for word reading and spelling. Second, our findings suggest that the deficits in reading comprehension are likely a combination of deficits in both decoding and oral language skills.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Dyslexia
Annals of Dyslexia Multiple-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.70%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Annals of Dyslexia is an interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the scientific study of dyslexia, its comorbid conditions; and theory-based practices on remediation, and intervention of dyslexia and related areas of written language disorders including spelling, composing and mathematics. Primary consideration for publication is given to original empirical studies, significant review, and well-documented reports of evidence-based effective practices. Only original papers are considered for publication.
期刊最新文献
Foveal crowding in children with developmental dyslexia. Bridging the Gap in Adult Dyslexia Research: Assessing the Efficacy of a Linguistic Intervention on Literacy Skills. Dyslexia in the 21st century: revisiting the consensus definition Exploring the feasibility of implementing the SPELL-Links to Reading and Writing intervention. Identifying students with dyslexia: exploration of current assessment methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1