{"title":"普瑞巴林治疗并发肌筋膜疼痛综合征和纤维肌痛综合征患者触发点的有效性:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Duygu Silte Karamanlioglu, Duygu Geler Kulcu, Gulcan Ozturk, Pinar Akpinar, Feyza Unlu Ozkan, Ilknur Aktas","doi":"10.1080/08990220.2021.1977265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim of the study: </strong>Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is a common problem in the general population. MPS should not be a local/peripheral painful syndrome and considered to be a syndrome of central sensitivity. We aimed to investigate the effect of pregabalin in patients with MPS in this study.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We randomized 40 patients into two groups, and 17 patients per group completed the study. Female patients in group I received pregabalin and exercise therapy, whereas those in group II received exercise therapy alone. All patients were evaluated as follows: for pain by visual analog scale (VAS); trigger-point pressure pain threshold-(PPT) by algometry; neuropathic pain using the Douleur Neuropathique en 4 Questions (DN4) and quality of life with the Short Form-36 (SF36). Evaluations were performed pre-treatment and at the end of the first and third months of treatment. Clinical trial ID: NCT04600037, retrospectively registered 20/10/2020.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In group I, significant improvements were observed in VAS, trigger-point-PPT, physical component summary-SF-36, at the first and third months. In group II, statistically significant improvements were observed in VAS, trigger-point-PPT after the first and third months. Group I showed statistically better improvements in VAS, trigger points-PPT, physical component summary-SF36 compared with group II by the third month.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pregabalin treatment is effective for controlling trigger points. Pregabalin treatment is also more effective than exercise treatment at improving quality of life in patients with MPS.</p>","PeriodicalId":49498,"journal":{"name":"Somatosensory and Motor Research","volume":"38 4","pages":"327-332"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of pregabalin treatment for trigger points in patients with comorbid myofascial pain syndrome and fibromyalgia syndrome: a randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Duygu Silte Karamanlioglu, Duygu Geler Kulcu, Gulcan Ozturk, Pinar Akpinar, Feyza Unlu Ozkan, Ilknur Aktas\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08990220.2021.1977265\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim of the study: </strong>Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is a common problem in the general population. MPS should not be a local/peripheral painful syndrome and considered to be a syndrome of central sensitivity. We aimed to investigate the effect of pregabalin in patients with MPS in this study.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We randomized 40 patients into two groups, and 17 patients per group completed the study. Female patients in group I received pregabalin and exercise therapy, whereas those in group II received exercise therapy alone. All patients were evaluated as follows: for pain by visual analog scale (VAS); trigger-point pressure pain threshold-(PPT) by algometry; neuropathic pain using the Douleur Neuropathique en 4 Questions (DN4) and quality of life with the Short Form-36 (SF36). Evaluations were performed pre-treatment and at the end of the first and third months of treatment. Clinical trial ID: NCT04600037, retrospectively registered 20/10/2020.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In group I, significant improvements were observed in VAS, trigger-point-PPT, physical component summary-SF-36, at the first and third months. In group II, statistically significant improvements were observed in VAS, trigger-point-PPT after the first and third months. Group I showed statistically better improvements in VAS, trigger points-PPT, physical component summary-SF36 compared with group II by the third month.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pregabalin treatment is effective for controlling trigger points. Pregabalin treatment is also more effective than exercise treatment at improving quality of life in patients with MPS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49498,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Somatosensory and Motor Research\",\"volume\":\"38 4\",\"pages\":\"327-332\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Somatosensory and Motor Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08990220.2021.1977265\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/9/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Somatosensory and Motor Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08990220.2021.1977265","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/9/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
研究目的:肌筋膜疼痛综合征(MPS)是普通人群的常见问题。MPS不应该是一种局部/外周疼痛综合征,而应该被认为是一种中枢敏感性综合征。本研究旨在探讨普瑞巴林在MPS患者中的作用。材料与方法:40例患者随机分为两组,每组17例患者完成研究。第一组女性患者接受普瑞巴林联合运动治疗,第二组女性患者单独接受运动治疗。所有患者的疼痛评分如下:视觉模拟评分(VAS);触发点压力痛阈值(PPT);神经性疼痛采用双神经性疼痛4题(DN4),生活质量采用短表36 (SF36)。在治疗前和治疗第一个月和第三个月结束时进行评估。临床试验ID: NCT04600037,回顾性注册20/10/2020。结果:第一组患者在第1个月和第3个月的VAS、触发点ppt、物理成分总结- sf -36评分均有明显改善。II组患者在第1个月和第3个月的VAS、触发点ppt均有统计学意义的改善。第3个月时,与第2组相比,第1组VAS、触发点- ppt、物理成分总结- sf36的改善具有统计学意义。结论:普瑞巴林治疗能有效控制诱发点。普瑞巴林治疗在改善MPS患者的生活质量方面也比运动治疗更有效。
Effectiveness of pregabalin treatment for trigger points in patients with comorbid myofascial pain syndrome and fibromyalgia syndrome: a randomized controlled trial.
Aim of the study: Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is a common problem in the general population. MPS should not be a local/peripheral painful syndrome and considered to be a syndrome of central sensitivity. We aimed to investigate the effect of pregabalin in patients with MPS in this study.
Materials and methods: We randomized 40 patients into two groups, and 17 patients per group completed the study. Female patients in group I received pregabalin and exercise therapy, whereas those in group II received exercise therapy alone. All patients were evaluated as follows: for pain by visual analog scale (VAS); trigger-point pressure pain threshold-(PPT) by algometry; neuropathic pain using the Douleur Neuropathique en 4 Questions (DN4) and quality of life with the Short Form-36 (SF36). Evaluations were performed pre-treatment and at the end of the first and third months of treatment. Clinical trial ID: NCT04600037, retrospectively registered 20/10/2020.
Results: In group I, significant improvements were observed in VAS, trigger-point-PPT, physical component summary-SF-36, at the first and third months. In group II, statistically significant improvements were observed in VAS, trigger-point-PPT after the first and third months. Group I showed statistically better improvements in VAS, trigger points-PPT, physical component summary-SF36 compared with group II by the third month.
Conclusion: Pregabalin treatment is effective for controlling trigger points. Pregabalin treatment is also more effective than exercise treatment at improving quality of life in patients with MPS.
期刊介绍:
Somatosensory & Motor Research publishes original, high-quality papers that encompass the entire range of investigations related to the neural bases for somatic sensation, somatic motor function, somatic motor integration, and modeling thereof. Comprising anatomical, physiological, biochemical, pharmacological, behavioural, and psychophysical studies, Somatosensory & Motor Research covers all facets of the peripheral and central processes underlying cutaneous sensation, and includes studies relating to afferent and efferent mechanisms of deep structures (e.g., viscera, muscle). Studies of motor systems at all levels of the neuraxis are covered, but reports restricted to non-neural aspects of muscle generally would belong in other journals.