职业性噪声致听力损失受试者的听觉行为和诱发电位反应(稳态和皮质)的比较

IF 1.4 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Journal of Otology Pub Date : 2021-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.joto.2021.05.002
P.H. DeJonckere , J. Lebacq
{"title":"职业性噪声致听力损失受试者的听觉行为和诱发电位反应(稳态和皮质)的比较","authors":"P.H. DeJonckere ,&nbsp;J. Lebacq","doi":"10.1016/j.joto.2021.05.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To define difference scores between PTA, ASSR and CERA thresholds in subjects with occupational NIHL.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>44 subjects undergoing a medico-legal expert assessment for occupational NIHL and fulfilling criteria of reliability were considered. Assessment included: PTA, 40 Hz binaural multiple ASSR and CERA (1-2-3 kHz).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The respective average difference scores (ASSR - PTA) for 1, 2 and 3 kHz are 13.01 (SD 10.19) dB, 12.72 (SD 8.81) dB and 10.38 (SD 8.19) dB. The average (CERA - ASSR) difference scores are 1.25 (SD 14.63) dB for 1 kHz (NS), 2.73 (SD 13.03) dB for 2 kHz (NS) and 4.51 (SD 12.18) dB for 3 kHz. The correlation between PTA and ASSR (0.82) is significantly stronger than that between PTA and CERA (0.71). In a given subject, PTA thresholds are nearly always lower (<em>i.e.,</em> better) than ASSR thresholds, whatever the frequency (1-2-3 kHz) and the side (right – left). A significant negative correlation is found between the difference score (ASSR – PTA) and the degree of hearing loss.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>ASSR outperforms CERA in a medicolegal context, although overestimating the behavioral thresholds by 10–13 dB<sub>.</sub></p></div>","PeriodicalId":37466,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Otology","volume":"16 4","pages":"Pages 242-251"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.joto.2021.05.002","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The comparison of auditory behavioral and evoked potential responses (steady state and cortical) in subjects with occupational noise-induced hearing loss\",\"authors\":\"P.H. DeJonckere ,&nbsp;J. Lebacq\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.joto.2021.05.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To define difference scores between PTA, ASSR and CERA thresholds in subjects with occupational NIHL.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>44 subjects undergoing a medico-legal expert assessment for occupational NIHL and fulfilling criteria of reliability were considered. Assessment included: PTA, 40 Hz binaural multiple ASSR and CERA (1-2-3 kHz).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The respective average difference scores (ASSR - PTA) for 1, 2 and 3 kHz are 13.01 (SD 10.19) dB, 12.72 (SD 8.81) dB and 10.38 (SD 8.19) dB. The average (CERA - ASSR) difference scores are 1.25 (SD 14.63) dB for 1 kHz (NS), 2.73 (SD 13.03) dB for 2 kHz (NS) and 4.51 (SD 12.18) dB for 3 kHz. The correlation between PTA and ASSR (0.82) is significantly stronger than that between PTA and CERA (0.71). In a given subject, PTA thresholds are nearly always lower (<em>i.e.,</em> better) than ASSR thresholds, whatever the frequency (1-2-3 kHz) and the side (right – left). A significant negative correlation is found between the difference score (ASSR – PTA) and the degree of hearing loss.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>ASSR outperforms CERA in a medicolegal context, although overestimating the behavioral thresholds by 10–13 dB<sub>.</sub></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37466,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Otology\",\"volume\":\"16 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 242-251\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.joto.2021.05.002\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Otology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S167229302100026X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Otology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S167229302100026X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的确定职业性NIHL患者PTA、ASSR和CERA阈值的差异评分。设计44名受试者接受了职业NIHL的医学法律专家评估,并符合可靠性标准。评估包括:PTA, 40 Hz双耳多重ASSR和CERA (1-2-3 kHz)。结果1、2和3 kHz的平均差异评分(ASSR - PTA)分别为13.01 (SD 10.19) dB、12.72 (SD 8.81) dB和10.38 (SD 8.19) dB。平均(CERA - ASSR)差异评分为1 kHz (NS) 1.25 (SD 14.63) dB, 2 kHz (NS) 2.73 (SD 13.03) dB和3 kHz (SD 12.18) dB。PTA与ASSR的相关性(0.82)显著强于PTA与CERA的相关性(0.71)。在给定的主题中,PTA阈值几乎总是比ASSR阈值低(即更好),无论频率(1-2-3 kHz)和侧面(右-左)如何。差异评分(ASSR - PTA)与听力损失程度呈显著负相关。结论assr在医学法律背景下优于CERA,尽管过高估计了10-13 dB的行为阈值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The comparison of auditory behavioral and evoked potential responses (steady state and cortical) in subjects with occupational noise-induced hearing loss

Objective

To define difference scores between PTA, ASSR and CERA thresholds in subjects with occupational NIHL.

Design

44 subjects undergoing a medico-legal expert assessment for occupational NIHL and fulfilling criteria of reliability were considered. Assessment included: PTA, 40 Hz binaural multiple ASSR and CERA (1-2-3 kHz).

Results

The respective average difference scores (ASSR - PTA) for 1, 2 and 3 kHz are 13.01 (SD 10.19) dB, 12.72 (SD 8.81) dB and 10.38 (SD 8.19) dB. The average (CERA - ASSR) difference scores are 1.25 (SD 14.63) dB for 1 kHz (NS), 2.73 (SD 13.03) dB for 2 kHz (NS) and 4.51 (SD 12.18) dB for 3 kHz. The correlation between PTA and ASSR (0.82) is significantly stronger than that between PTA and CERA (0.71). In a given subject, PTA thresholds are nearly always lower (i.e., better) than ASSR thresholds, whatever the frequency (1-2-3 kHz) and the side (right – left). A significant negative correlation is found between the difference score (ASSR – PTA) and the degree of hearing loss.

Conclusion

ASSR outperforms CERA in a medicolegal context, although overestimating the behavioral thresholds by 10–13 dB.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Otology
Journal of Otology Medicine-Otorhinolaryngology
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
461
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Otology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that publishes research findings from disciplines related to both clinical and basic science aspects of auditory and vestibular system and diseases of the ear. This journal welcomes submissions describing original experimental research that may improve our understanding of the mechanisms underlying problems of basic or clinical significance and treatment of patients with disorders of the auditory and vestibular systems. In addition to original papers the journal also offers invited review articles on current topics written by leading experts in the field. The journal is of primary importance for all scientists and practitioners interested in audiology, otology and neurotology, auditory neurosciences and related disciplines. Journal of Otology welcomes contributions from scholars in all countries and regions across the world.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Comparative utility of vestibular function tests in patients with peripheral and central vestibular dysfunction Co-infection with Neisseria mucosa in a patient with tuberculous otitis media A case report on a rare case of primary tuberculous otitis media The application of the strip-shaped cymba conchae orthosis in the nonsurgical correction of complex auricular deformity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1