{"title":"职业性噪声致听力损失受试者的听觉行为和诱发电位反应(稳态和皮质)的比较","authors":"P.H. DeJonckere , J. Lebacq","doi":"10.1016/j.joto.2021.05.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To define difference scores between PTA, ASSR and CERA thresholds in subjects with occupational NIHL.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>44 subjects undergoing a medico-legal expert assessment for occupational NIHL and fulfilling criteria of reliability were considered. Assessment included: PTA, 40 Hz binaural multiple ASSR and CERA (1-2-3 kHz).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The respective average difference scores (ASSR - PTA) for 1, 2 and 3 kHz are 13.01 (SD 10.19) dB, 12.72 (SD 8.81) dB and 10.38 (SD 8.19) dB. The average (CERA - ASSR) difference scores are 1.25 (SD 14.63) dB for 1 kHz (NS), 2.73 (SD 13.03) dB for 2 kHz (NS) and 4.51 (SD 12.18) dB for 3 kHz. The correlation between PTA and ASSR (0.82) is significantly stronger than that between PTA and CERA (0.71). In a given subject, PTA thresholds are nearly always lower (<em>i.e.,</em> better) than ASSR thresholds, whatever the frequency (1-2-3 kHz) and the side (right – left). A significant negative correlation is found between the difference score (ASSR – PTA) and the degree of hearing loss.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>ASSR outperforms CERA in a medicolegal context, although overestimating the behavioral thresholds by 10–13 dB<sub>.</sub></p></div>","PeriodicalId":37466,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Otology","volume":"16 4","pages":"Pages 242-251"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.joto.2021.05.002","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The comparison of auditory behavioral and evoked potential responses (steady state and cortical) in subjects with occupational noise-induced hearing loss\",\"authors\":\"P.H. DeJonckere , J. Lebacq\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.joto.2021.05.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To define difference scores between PTA, ASSR and CERA thresholds in subjects with occupational NIHL.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>44 subjects undergoing a medico-legal expert assessment for occupational NIHL and fulfilling criteria of reliability were considered. Assessment included: PTA, 40 Hz binaural multiple ASSR and CERA (1-2-3 kHz).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The respective average difference scores (ASSR - PTA) for 1, 2 and 3 kHz are 13.01 (SD 10.19) dB, 12.72 (SD 8.81) dB and 10.38 (SD 8.19) dB. The average (CERA - ASSR) difference scores are 1.25 (SD 14.63) dB for 1 kHz (NS), 2.73 (SD 13.03) dB for 2 kHz (NS) and 4.51 (SD 12.18) dB for 3 kHz. The correlation between PTA and ASSR (0.82) is significantly stronger than that between PTA and CERA (0.71). In a given subject, PTA thresholds are nearly always lower (<em>i.e.,</em> better) than ASSR thresholds, whatever the frequency (1-2-3 kHz) and the side (right – left). A significant negative correlation is found between the difference score (ASSR – PTA) and the degree of hearing loss.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>ASSR outperforms CERA in a medicolegal context, although overestimating the behavioral thresholds by 10–13 dB<sub>.</sub></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37466,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Otology\",\"volume\":\"16 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 242-251\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.joto.2021.05.002\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Otology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S167229302100026X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Otology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S167229302100026X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The comparison of auditory behavioral and evoked potential responses (steady state and cortical) in subjects with occupational noise-induced hearing loss
Objective
To define difference scores between PTA, ASSR and CERA thresholds in subjects with occupational NIHL.
Design
44 subjects undergoing a medico-legal expert assessment for occupational NIHL and fulfilling criteria of reliability were considered. Assessment included: PTA, 40 Hz binaural multiple ASSR and CERA (1-2-3 kHz).
Results
The respective average difference scores (ASSR - PTA) for 1, 2 and 3 kHz are 13.01 (SD 10.19) dB, 12.72 (SD 8.81) dB and 10.38 (SD 8.19) dB. The average (CERA - ASSR) difference scores are 1.25 (SD 14.63) dB for 1 kHz (NS), 2.73 (SD 13.03) dB for 2 kHz (NS) and 4.51 (SD 12.18) dB for 3 kHz. The correlation between PTA and ASSR (0.82) is significantly stronger than that between PTA and CERA (0.71). In a given subject, PTA thresholds are nearly always lower (i.e., better) than ASSR thresholds, whatever the frequency (1-2-3 kHz) and the side (right – left). A significant negative correlation is found between the difference score (ASSR – PTA) and the degree of hearing loss.
Conclusion
ASSR outperforms CERA in a medicolegal context, although overestimating the behavioral thresholds by 10–13 dB.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Otology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that publishes research findings from disciplines related to both clinical and basic science aspects of auditory and vestibular system and diseases of the ear. This journal welcomes submissions describing original experimental research that may improve our understanding of the mechanisms underlying problems of basic or clinical significance and treatment of patients with disorders of the auditory and vestibular systems. In addition to original papers the journal also offers invited review articles on current topics written by leading experts in the field. The journal is of primary importance for all scientists and practitioners interested in audiology, otology and neurotology, auditory neurosciences and related disciplines. Journal of Otology welcomes contributions from scholars in all countries and regions across the world.