如何简化骨髓瘤新化疗干预的评估?

Clinical Hematology International Pub Date : 2021-02-08 eCollection Date: 2021-03-01 DOI:10.2991/chi.k.210201.001
Treen Carson Michael Morris, Mary B Drake, Paul J Kettle, Tracey McGuigan, Maeve Leahy, Michael O'Dwyer, Helen Enright, Tanya O'Shea, Rakesh Popat, Heather E Oakervee, Kwee Yong, Jamie D Cavenagh, David A Cairns, Alberto Alvarez-Iglesias, Gordon Cook
{"title":"如何简化骨髓瘤新化疗干预的评估?","authors":"Treen Carson Michael Morris, Mary B Drake, Paul J Kettle, Tracey McGuigan, Maeve Leahy, Michael O'Dwyer, Helen Enright, Tanya O'Shea, Rakesh Popat, Heather E Oakervee, Kwee Yong, Jamie D Cavenagh, David A Cairns, Alberto Alvarez-Iglesias, Gordon Cook","doi":"10.2991/chi.k.210201.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>When the bortezomib [PS341], adriamycin and dexamethasone (PAD) regimen was first evaluated, the response rate in untreated patients was much superior to that elicited by conventional chemotherapeutic agents. We demonstrated the efficacy of PAD in relapsed or refractory patients by comparing the response rate obtained in 53 patients who received vincristine, adriamycin and dexamethasone (VAD) or equivalent regimen as induction therapy, using a comparative design in which each patient acted as their own control. Whereas 25 patients had a positive response to VAD, 37 patients had a response to PAD ≤ partial remission (PR) (<i>p</i> = 0.023). Using the more stringent response level of very good PR (VGPR) the results favored the PAD regimen very significantly (<i>p</i> = 0.006) (McNemars test). Similar results were seen using paired M-protein levels from individual patient comparisons. As the PAD regimen was subsequently adopted as the re-induction therapy in the British Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation/United Kingdom Myeloma Forum Myeloma X (Intensive) trial, now concluded, we have retrospectively analyzed the findings from both studies. Comparison of response rates and adverse effects of patients having had previous autologous transplantation (Cohort 1) with the corresponding data from Myeloma X showed close correlation. These findings provide evidence that rapid results may be obtained in the evaluation of newly introduced, and potentially highly effective, anti-tumour agents by direct comparison to the response to the immediately preceding standard regimen, particularly in relatively resistant tumours.</p>","PeriodicalId":10368,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Hematology International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/de/a9/CHI-3-1-27.PMC8432324.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How to Simplify the Evaluation of Newly Introduced Chemotherapeutic Interventions in Myeloma.\",\"authors\":\"Treen Carson Michael Morris, Mary B Drake, Paul J Kettle, Tracey McGuigan, Maeve Leahy, Michael O'Dwyer, Helen Enright, Tanya O'Shea, Rakesh Popat, Heather E Oakervee, Kwee Yong, Jamie D Cavenagh, David A Cairns, Alberto Alvarez-Iglesias, Gordon Cook\",\"doi\":\"10.2991/chi.k.210201.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>When the bortezomib [PS341], adriamycin and dexamethasone (PAD) regimen was first evaluated, the response rate in untreated patients was much superior to that elicited by conventional chemotherapeutic agents. We demonstrated the efficacy of PAD in relapsed or refractory patients by comparing the response rate obtained in 53 patients who received vincristine, adriamycin and dexamethasone (VAD) or equivalent regimen as induction therapy, using a comparative design in which each patient acted as their own control. Whereas 25 patients had a positive response to VAD, 37 patients had a response to PAD ≤ partial remission (PR) (<i>p</i> = 0.023). Using the more stringent response level of very good PR (VGPR) the results favored the PAD regimen very significantly (<i>p</i> = 0.006) (McNemars test). Similar results were seen using paired M-protein levels from individual patient comparisons. As the PAD regimen was subsequently adopted as the re-induction therapy in the British Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation/United Kingdom Myeloma Forum Myeloma X (Intensive) trial, now concluded, we have retrospectively analyzed the findings from both studies. Comparison of response rates and adverse effects of patients having had previous autologous transplantation (Cohort 1) with the corresponding data from Myeloma X showed close correlation. These findings provide evidence that rapid results may be obtained in the evaluation of newly introduced, and potentially highly effective, anti-tumour agents by direct comparison to the response to the immediately preceding standard regimen, particularly in relatively resistant tumours.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10368,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Hematology International\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/de/a9/CHI-3-1-27.PMC8432324.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Hematology International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2991/chi.k.210201.001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Hematology International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/chi.k.210201.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在首次评估硼替佐米[PS341]、阿霉素和地塞米松(PAD)方案时,未经治疗的患者的应答率远远高于传统化疗药物。我们通过比较 53 名接受长春新碱、阿霉素和地塞米松(VAD)或同等方案作为诱导治疗的患者的反应率,证明了 PAD 对复发或难治患者的疗效。25名患者对VAD产生了阳性反应,37名患者对PAD的反应≤部分缓解(PR)(p = 0.023)。如果采用更严格的反应水平,即非常好的 PR (VGPR),结果则非常明显地有利于 PAD 方案(p = 0.006)(麦克尼马斯检验)。使用来自单个患者的配对 M 蛋白水平进行比较也得出了类似的结果。英国血液与骨髓移植学会/英国骨髓瘤论坛骨髓瘤 X(强化)试验现已结束,由于 PAD 方案随后被英国血液与骨髓移植学会/英国骨髓瘤论坛骨髓瘤 X(强化)试验采用为再诱导疗法,我们对这两项研究的结果进行了回顾性分析。将既往接受过自体移植的患者(队列 1)的反应率和不良反应与骨髓瘤 X 的相应数据进行比较,结果显示两者密切相关。这些研究结果证明,在评估新引进的、可能非常有效的抗肿瘤药物时,可以通过直接比较对之前标准方案的反应来快速得出结果,尤其是对相对耐药的肿瘤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How to Simplify the Evaluation of Newly Introduced Chemotherapeutic Interventions in Myeloma.

When the bortezomib [PS341], adriamycin and dexamethasone (PAD) regimen was first evaluated, the response rate in untreated patients was much superior to that elicited by conventional chemotherapeutic agents. We demonstrated the efficacy of PAD in relapsed or refractory patients by comparing the response rate obtained in 53 patients who received vincristine, adriamycin and dexamethasone (VAD) or equivalent regimen as induction therapy, using a comparative design in which each patient acted as their own control. Whereas 25 patients had a positive response to VAD, 37 patients had a response to PAD ≤ partial remission (PR) (p = 0.023). Using the more stringent response level of very good PR (VGPR) the results favored the PAD regimen very significantly (p = 0.006) (McNemars test). Similar results were seen using paired M-protein levels from individual patient comparisons. As the PAD regimen was subsequently adopted as the re-induction therapy in the British Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation/United Kingdom Myeloma Forum Myeloma X (Intensive) trial, now concluded, we have retrospectively analyzed the findings from both studies. Comparison of response rates and adverse effects of patients having had previous autologous transplantation (Cohort 1) with the corresponding data from Myeloma X showed close correlation. These findings provide evidence that rapid results may be obtained in the evaluation of newly introduced, and potentially highly effective, anti-tumour agents by direct comparison to the response to the immediately preceding standard regimen, particularly in relatively resistant tumours.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Evolving Role of Bridging Therapy during CAR-T Therapy How I treat newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia Elranatamab treatment in a multiple myeloma patient undergoing renal dialysis Outcomes of Autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with primary refractory Diffuse Large B-cell lymphoma who demonstrate chemosensitivity to salvage chemotherapy Outpatient CAR T-Cell Therapy as Standard of Care: Current Perspectives and Considerations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1